Product Managers might be confusing their problems - and slowing themselves down

Product Managers might be confusing their problems - and slowing themselves down

Do you know the difference between a complicated and a complex problem?

Product managers are problem people - sometimes problematic people but mostly just people who love to and are accountable for digging into problems a company needs to solve for itself and its customers. Recognizing problems is an essential skillset for any product manager - and the differences between problems matter.

Roll with me as I pose a couple of offbeat example problems: trying to build a rocket and raise a child.

Setting out to build a rocket, you’ve got some clarity. You know you’re shooting for the moon (or low earth orbit, at least), and you know you’re going to use a lot of fire to get there. You might also want to try to save costs by, say, building a reusable rocket (hey, Elon.) The challenge in building that rocket is figuring out all the choices of fuels, systems, materials and people who get you from point A to point B. Rocket building is a complicated problem: clear start and endpoints, but many routes to success.

Raising a child offers no such clarity. You know where you’ll start (if not, I suggest some remedial reading), but you have no clue how success looks. You and your partner may have different ideas on who you hope your kid will grow up to be. Even if you have a model adult pictured in your head, who your child becomes isn’t ultimately under your control:

  • That child will encounter thousands of people thousands of times. Some of those interactions will only turn out to be important in hindsight.
  • You might try one parenting philosophy and find it has the exact opposite effect you intended.
  • Your child has their personality and will make choices you’d never imagine making.
  • You probably won’t even recognize the world they see.

With unclear goals and many uncontrollable variables, it’s safe to say raising a child is a complex problem.

Back to problems we can solve, what does this difference between complex and complicated issues mean for a product manager? Different situations require different approaches, and design thinking comes into play.

You can handle complicated problems with traditional analysis and project management. The process theoretically goes: 

  • Break down and analyze each piece of the problem to clarify it until an answer becomes easier to see and requirements become clear
  • Assign steps to each requirement and plan a timeline
  • Execute on the plan, testing as you go, solving new problems as they emerge

It rarely works this simply, but this approach and these methods are exactly what we’ve built our companies to support, what they value as productive. Keep solving problems as they reveal themselves and profit.

Complex and complicated problems have in common the need to quickly find the best solution. Design thinking, at its simplest, is the habit and discipline of looking at more answers than you think you’ll need before settling on the one you’ll implement. That hunt for more options, more learning helps accelerate and perfect the end product.

Complex problems need the same sort of treatment, and design thinking fits the bill. Complex problems have too many uncontrolled factors at play, too many perspectives to consider if you’re analyzing each possibility. Where do product managers typically find these kinds of problems? Customers! People are complex. They say they need one thing, but they need another. They like a feature but don’t use it because they’re facing many decisions and priorities in a day. They make decisions on emotions and external pressures.

Analysis suits looking deeply into one problem. Trying to analyze complex problems leaves too many considerations to manage, commonly known as analysis paralysis!

Design thinking approaches to problem framing leave the framing/decision-making to later. Design thinkers insist on gathering a wide range of evidence beyond the initial and obvious problem. If your customer makes a feature request about emailing, you explore how they communicate through all modes. You talk about what they’re sharing. You look at what inspires them to speak. Because maybe it’s not about emailing at all.

Of course, you have to settle on a problem to solve eventually. Design thinkers will compare and contrast the relative value of all the problems they’ve found before settling on the one that will create the most significant, most valuable change.

Not every challenge is complex -- complicated problems are just as valuable. Not every question calls for design thinking, but not every problem can be managed traditionally. Knowing the difference can change the way you manage your product and the successes you achieve.

Amazing! Thank you for sharing, Richard Liebrecht! This event would help add value, Successful 'Customer Journeys with Emerging Technologies' You’ll get unique insights and a deep understanding of how to take your company’s customer experience to the next level through digital transformation and intelligently automating key aspects of your business processes. Get actionable insights on how you can improve your customers’ journey through result-driven strategies that you can apply to get increased value. https://lnkd.in/endwvEW

回复
???? Chris Caldwell

The Co-creation Anti-workshop? ?? | Collaborative team working sessions that deliver the desired outcomes ?? | Founder of Caldwell Creative and Shopify Alumni

4 年

The process of re-alignment and looking at the problem from a holistic lens of users, the business, and the broader set of stakeholders combined with meaningful ideation and contributes to generating a number of ideas, approaches, and concepts large enough that solutions emerge that provide wins for more people. This is the essence of finding the simplest ideas that have the highest amount of leverage while creating the optimal product experience. This type of work is how you create teams that are highly effective at solving ambiguous challenges while avoiding the trap of unproductive efficiency.

Mariel Jane Sanchez, BBA, (ISC)2

Focused on creating solutions through a design thinking approach

4 年

The framing is everything! The part I love about design thinking is the RE-framing of the problem. It's messy because it can mean we need to pivot and start the whole process again. But this time we start with experience and a deeper understanding of the customers' point of view. I always feel lighter at this stage because the team would have more confidence in ideation?and prototyping. Thank you for this article! It made me realize how design thinking can be applied in product management.?

Cheryl Court

Senior Software Developer at Vertical City

4 年

Thanks for this reminder about complicated and complex. It reminds me of the difference between managing projects/work and "managing" people. Sometimes you have to do both of these in a single role and you need to be able to see that difference and switch tactics accordingly. It can be easy to apply the wrong approach if you lack this awareness.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Richard Liebrecht的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了