Procter & Gamble’s King of the Innovation Mountain

The personal healthcare company Procter and Gamble, better known as P&G, was founded in 1837 in Cincinnati by brothers-in-law William Procter and James Gamble. Their business was a budding enterprise that experienced steady regional progress during the mid-19th century and then exploded with growth during the Civil War winning Union contracts to provide soap and candles to the war effort. By the turn of the century, they had expanded across the United States and then internationally making everyday items from toilet paper and shampoo to fabric softener and toothpaste. Over the last 50-years, P&G continued their evolution absorbing companies and becoming one of the top global conglomerates at one point reaching $83 Billion in annual sales. They had become an iconic company of personal healthcare and a standard in the American household.

Today’s corporate environment call on mature companies to create around 5% of organic growth a year to maintain market share and stock stability. For P&G that equates to $4 Billion a year in new business. While many corporations look at this as a continual innovation crisis, P&G has positioned themselves to systematically introduce new products on a routine basis. This begins with their investment in 26 research and development (R&D) centers around the world while spending ~$2.1 Billion per year in these efforts. This renewed commitment came in the year 2000 when their performance of new products was hitting a success rate or achieving a return on investment in only 15% to 20% of each new product introduction. A renewed focus and investment back onto innovation proved successful wherein 2008 P&G achieved a success rate of 50% to 60% on new product introductions. Surprisingly enough, their goal is not to achieve a higher percentage of successful product introductions as they believe that strategy would be too limited by risk management and that they wouldn’t be pushing the edge of innovation far enough.

Their culture of innovation has led to P&G being not only a hub for human talent but also an American mainstay in the corporate lexicon. They do this in simplistic terms by...

Rest of the Article

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Matt D.M. Watson, Ph.D., PMP的更多文章

  • Change Management Communications

    Change Management Communications

    Change Management Communications Organizations must constantly adapt and evolve to stay competitive in today's…

  • Top 5 Businesses in 2100

    Top 5 Businesses in 2100

    Top 5 Businesses in 2100 The business landscape will undergo significant changes as we look ahead to the year 2100…

  • Organizational Change Cultures

    Organizational Change Cultures

    Organizational culture can make or break change management efforts. When leaders fail to recognize the impact of…

  • Readiness For Changing

    Readiness For Changing

    Readiness For Changing Change is the only constant in life, and in today's business landscape, change is happening…

  • Change Leadership

    Change Leadership

    Change Leadership Leadership and change management are critical components of an organization's success. Leaders'…

  • Top 5 Jobs in 2100

    Top 5 Jobs in 2100

    Top 5 Jobs in 2100 As we look ahead to the year 2100, it's clear that the world of work will undergo significant…

  • Change Strategy

    Change Strategy

    Change Strategy Every organization, big or small, must adapt to market conditions, technological advancements, and new…

    1 条评论
  • Top 5 Corporate Strategies That Will Be Used in 2025

    Top 5 Corporate Strategies That Will Be Used in 2025

    Top 5 Corporate Strategies That Will Be Used in 2025 As we look towards 2025, businesses must consider various…

  • Business Model Innovation

    Business Model Innovation

    Business Model Innovation In the ever-changing business landscape, innovation has become the key to success. Companies…

  • Mergers & Acquisitions

    Mergers & Acquisitions

    The Paradox of Mergers and Acquisitions: Why Most Fail Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are the corporate equivalent of a…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了