Process as a substitute for competence

Sometimes, even with the best intentions, we take the easy path of weak leadership.. While processes are essential for consistency and quality control, balancing following procedures and relying on individual or collective competence and expertise is essential. A critical skill is knowing when to deviate from a process and favoring a more suitable approach.

The phrase "process as a substitute for competence" refers to an organization or individual relying heavily on following established procedures or processes instead of relying on their own skills, knowledge, or competence to make decisions or achieve goals. In such cases, people may prioritize adhering to a set process even when it may not be the most effective or efficient way to accomplish a task.

Here are a few key points to consider regarding this concept:

1. Over-reliance on Procedures: When individuals or organizations become overly dependent on following established processes, they may do so even when improvisation, creativity, or expertise would be more beneficial.
2. Risk Aversion: Process-driven approaches can sometimes emerge as a way to minimize risk. People may feel that if they follow a standard process, they are less likely to make mistakes or face criticism, even if there are better approaches for a specific situation.
3. Inflexibility: Relying too heavily on processes can make an organization or individual inflexible and resistant to change. This can hinder adaptation to new challenges or opportunities.
4. Lack of Innovation: When process takes precedence over competence, it can stifle innovation and creative problem-solving. People may feel they need to be more empowered to deviate from established procedures to explore new, more effective methods.
5. Adverse Outcomes: In some cases, this approach can lead to poor outcomes, as individuals or organizations may continue down a predetermined path even when it is clear that the chosen process is not working.

In summary, while processes are essential for organization and efficiency, they should not be used as a complete substitute for competence and expertise. Competent individuals and organizations should be able to assess each situation and determine whether following a particular process is the best course of action or if their expertise and judgment should take precedence.

#leadership #ceocoaching #ceoleadership #gartnerea #gartnersym #executivecoaching #digitaltransformation #businesstransformation #enterprisearchitecture #cio100 #cioinsights #innovation #harvardbusinessreview