Problem-Solving Technique: Step 3- Root Cause Analysis: Ishikawa Diagram (Fish-Bone Diagram)
Bhavya Mangla
Quality Champion | CXO Leadership 2023 | Writer | YouTuber | Toastmaster
“When solving problems, dig at the roots instead of just hacking at the leaves." – Anthony J. D’Angelo
Introduction
Companies that are committed to quality are always looking for ways to improve. When a process is running smoothly, they explore new ways of enhancing workflow. When something breaks down, they take extra steps to ensure a clear?understanding of the problem’s root cause. Instead of simply fixing the surface issue.
Objective
In the problem-solving technique (like the 8D Model), one of the most pertinent steps is to find a real reason why that failure/problem/defect has occurred. Once it is adequately identified, the organization can take appropriate corrective action. There a different types of root cause analysis techniques which include 3Leg/5Why Analysis, Ishikawa Diagram, PDCA and many more.?
As part of a sustainable quality program, you need to identify the issues related to the quality issues, otherwise, you will keep spinning your wheels and using your resources to constantly correct the issue, but never addressing the cause(s). There are many root cause analysis techniques you can use. Here we will focus on the fishbone diagram, in the context of quality.
Synonym(s):?
?Ishikawa diagram, herringbone diagram, cause-and-effect diagram, or Fishikawa
Definitions (ISO 9000: 2015):
Complaint (clause 3.9.3): Expression of dissatisfaction made to an organization related to its product or service or the complaints handling process itself where a response or resolution is explicitly or implicitly expected.
Complainant (clause 3.1; ISO 10001: 2018): Person, organization or their representative making a complaint.
Corrective Action (Cl 3.12.2): Action to eliminate the cause of nonconformity and to prevent reoccurrence.
Correction (Cl 3.12.3): Action to eliminate a detected nonconformity
Read More: https://bit.ly/Step1DefineProblem
Detailed Information:
The following are the 7 key steps for problem-solving.
1.?????? Define the Problem
2.????? Correction, Containment, Interim Action
3.????? Root Cause Analysis: 3 Layered 5 Why Analysis (3L5Y), Ishikawa Diagram, PDCA
4.????? Implementation of Corrective Action
5.????? Effectiveness Evaluation
6.????? Horizontal Deployment
7.????? Documentation, Lesson Learned and Promotion of Awareness
Read More: https://bit.ly/ProblemSolvingTechnique
The Ishikawa diagram focuses on the multiple root causes for one quality issue.?Each root cause or reason for bad quality is added to the diagram and grouped into categories to identify and classify these causes. The result looks like a fishbone, hence its name. The contour of the fish is optional.
Brief History:
The Ishikawa diagram was developed by Kaoru Ishikawa during the 1960s as a way of measuring quality control processes in the shipbuilding industry. The main issue is recorded on the right side of the page because the traditional Japanese script reads down a vertical column from right to left across the page.
Read More: https://bit.ly/CorrectionContainmentInterim
领英推荐
More about Fishbone:
When to use the fishbone diagram:
?Step for using Fish Bone Diagram:
§? Ask Why?
§? And Why Else?...
§? Using diagrams helps broaden and focus thinking
§? Primary Cause à leads directly to the effect
§? Secondary Cause à leads to primary but does not directly cause and effect
Tip: It is not always mandatory to use 4, 5 or 8 factors for the fishbone diagram. Instead, all relevant factors for the problem should be addressed. And you can of course use other terms that do not begin with M.
Read More: https://bit.ly/RootCauseAnalysis3L5Y
Industry Challenges:
References:
IATF 16949: 2016
ISO 9001: 2015
ISO 9000: 2015
OEM Supplier Manual
CQI 20: Aug 2018, 2nd Edition (Effective Problem-Solving Guide)
Industry Experts
Author: “Beyond the Five Whys” and “Lean auditing” Director: Risk & assurance insights
2 周The fishbone is powerful but the old cause categories need to be updated for modern best practice - for example “human factors” “design” “roles and responsibilities” etc. You also need to think systemically sometimes .. For more information see “Beyond the Five whys: Root cause analysis and systems thinking.” https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Beyond+the+Five+Whys%3A+Root+Cause+Analysis+and+Systems+Thinking-p-9781394191079