The problem with branding
Tamsen Webster, MA, MBA
Message designer, English-to-English translator, starry-eyed realist. Hyperfocused on accelerating the understanding and adoption of new ideas.
One of my favorite phrases is “Deeds, not words.” It’s the?1903 motto of the Women’s Social and Political Union?(WPSU) in Manchester, England.?The Union and its leader, Emmeline Parkhurst, came up with the motto to capture?how?they were planning to fight for women’s right to vote in England: through vandalism, violence, and civil disobedience.
In other words, these women had had quite enough talking,?thank you very much, and now it was time to?act. While the movement, and the phrase itself, eventually gave up the more violent forms of protest, the concept that “actions speak louder than words” was a powerful rallying cry.
It also?explains what so often goes wrong with branding.
First, let’s define some terms.?Your?brand?is the sum total of people’s experiences with you.?Everything?a brand says and does contributes to your thoughts and feelings about it. It’s why I agree with Jeff Bezos’s definition, that “Your brand is what people say about you when you are not in the room.”
Branding,?on the other hand,?is the group of activities associated with trying to capture what a company?wants?its brand to be,?usually in the form of words (tagline, ad copy, etc.) and visuals (logo, colors, and so on). It’s how brands try to shape the narrative of what people tell themselves, and others, about the brand. For example, United Airlines and their long-standing tagline, “Fly the friendly skies.”
Especially if you want to “build a better brand,” do you start to see the problem? Here it is: there’s?often a big ol’ gap between the narrative a brand tries to?shape?and the narrative the brand actually?lives—how it acts.
United wasn’t exactly friendly to?Dave Carroll’s guitar. Or to Dr. David Dao, who got?dragged off an overbooked United flight. For many of us familiar with those stories, or any others that seemed to fit the pattern of “not-so-friendly skies,” experiences like that start to make United’s brand of “friendly” feel, well, fake.
And?that’s?a problem because how you act affects what people think about you just as much, if not more, than what you say. My good friend and colleague?Dr. Nick Morgan?talks about how this applies to humans in his book?Power Cues. When someone’s words don’t match their body language, we believe the body language.
In almost every environment,?actions speak louder than words.
What do you do about that gap??The answer seems obvious: “close it.”
…But that’s not exactly helpful.
The more specific answer is to “do what you say and say what you do.” Psychologists call that “behavioral congruence,” where there’s “consistency between the aims, attitudes, and values professed by an individual or group and their observable behaviors.”
Achieving?that, though, requires knowing what the actual “aims, attitudes, and values” of a brand or person are. Not the ones the brand?professes?in its branding—the ones driving the “observable behaviors” that drive the?brand.
Beliefs drive behaviors that define the brand.?When you understand the principles that set the patterns of how you act, you gain the power to understand what’s?actually?shaping your brand and how you need to adjust your actions, or your branding, accordingly.
Note something incredibly important here:?these are not aspirational beliefs.?These are not the “aims, attitudes, and values” that you?wish?you had or that you think will play well in the market. They’re the deep-seated, core principles that?already?guide your day-to-day decisions and choices, often unconsciously.
My new book?is all about helping both individuals and organizations drive change and expedite impact by surfacing these underlying beliefs and principles.
You can get started today?in a few different ways:
Since the problem with branding almost always lies in that gap between deeds and words, fixing it comes down to focusing on “deeds”—actions and behaviors—then?on the words that describe the beliefs and principles behind them.
What brands and organizations do you think do both parts well? Which ones don’t??Email me?and let me know. I’d love to include your example in my new book (with full credit to you, of course!).
Training to lead my neighbourhood through the zombie apocalypse
1 年I host my podcasts with a company called Transistor. I have a great relationship with them as a customer and I feel that my feedback is heard. And when they’re in my industry news feed, it’s because the founder has done or said something I feel like I’d’ve said in that position. I migrated to them because I liked their approach to user interaction. One of rhe chief reasons I stay and I advocate for them is because their brand and their actions are aligned. That’s not true with lots of companies in that space.
Principal Consultant - Purkay Labs * Sharing lessons learned in Data Center Operations
2 年In a fast food world where you can go most anywhere and get the product you want, Chick-fil-A is closed on Sundays, as the owner is in the belief, and one I recall and share, that Sunday is a day of rest and family. Judging from the lines at a Chick-fil-A on the days they are open, they are putting people ahead of additional profits they would no doubt be making. And, oh by the way, the food is very good. I was always impressed by their firm commitment to this business model.
?? SUREFIRE GROWTH STRATEGIST? & ?? KEYNOTE SPEAKER | ? Helping agencies & firms stand out, win right-fit clients & scale profitably with brand-led strategy.
2 年Here’s a few who live thier principles at every level of their organization: Skipper Auto lead by the amazing Sonia Strobel. Coralus (formerly SheEO) led by the radically generous Vicki Saunders (She/Her). Goodbye Ouch led by the wonderfully socially and spiritually conscious Becky Cashman. Beany.com led by the brilliant Sue de Bievre. The Alinker Inventions Ltd. founded by the brilliant BE Alink.
Student at Middlebury College | YNG
2 年Such an interesting read! So engaging all the way through. Some organizations that do both parts well include Patagonia, which emphasizes sustainable practices in their supply chain and has a mission statement of “Build the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis.” The North Face is another organization that values sustainability and social responsibility.
Supporting savvy leaders to turn disruption into opportunity | Resilience Capacity Building, Re-Org Recovery, Strategic Advisory, Leadership & Team Coaching, New Leader Effectiveness | Ex-Accenture & Intel
2 年The immediate brand that leads to mind for me is Patagonia. They demonstrate in all kinds of ways — including taking Thanksgiving Day off rather than making it a Black Friday — how much they care about the earth and people.