Privatization coupon – citizens “fair share” of the commune property or a get rich scheme for the powerful and corrupt? -30 years after-

During and after the October Revolution of 1917, the Soviet government nationalized most private property in the country. This included land, buildings, factories, and businesses, which were taken over by the state and became the property of the people as a whole. This nationalization was part of the Soviet government's efforts to establish a planned economy, in which the means of production and distribution were controlled by the state. The nationalization of private property was also seen as a way to redistribute wealth and resources and to eliminate the exploitation of workers by capitalists.

However, nationalization was not universal and some private businesses were allowed to continue operating, particularly in agriculture and small-scale trade. Over time, the Soviet government also established collective and state farms, as well as state-owned enterprises, which dominated the economy. Nationalization of private property and the establishment of a planned economy were major features of the Soviet system, and remained in place until the country's transition to a market economy in the 1990s.

Privatization became necessary in Russia in the 1990s because the Soviet-era planned economy was in a state of collapse and was unable to provide goods and services to the population effectively. The Soviet economy was characterized by low productivity, declining output, and widespread shortages, and was unable to compete with economies in the West.

To address these problems, the Russian government initiated a process of economic reform, including the privatization of state-owned enterprises, as a way to increase efficiency, encourage competition, and attract investment. The government believed that privatizing state-owned enterprises would lead to improved management, increased investment, and greater efficiency, as private owners would have a stronger incentive to make profits and improve the performance of their businesses.

Furthermore, the government saw privatization as a way to raise revenue, as many state-owned assets were sold to private companies, often at a significant discount. Privatization was also seen as a way to increase economic freedom and to give individuals greater control over the means of production, which was seen as an important step in the transition from a planned economy to a market economy.

However, the process of privatization was not without its challenges and controversies, and was criticized for contributing to corruption and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few individuals. Nevertheless, the Russian government continued with its program of privatization, and the country has made significant progress in its transition to a market economy.

In Russia, privatization coupons were used as a means of distributing ownership in state-owned enterprises to the population during the early stages of the country's transition to a market economy. The coupons were distributed in 1992 to every Russian citizen as a form of compensation for the loss of the state's property, and were used as a way to encourage widespread participation in the privatization process. Citizens could either use the coupons to purchase shares in the companies being privatized or trade the coupons on financial markets.

This approach was intended to ensure that the transition from state ownership to private ownership was as equitable as possible, and to help prevent the concentration of ownership in the hands of a few individuals or corporations. The use of privatization coupons in Russia was one of the largest mass-privatization programs in history, and was seen as a key factor in the country's transition to a market economy. However, it was also criticized for contributing to corruption and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few individuals, and for hindering the development of a stable and competitive market economy.

Most Russian citizens did not use their privatization coupons to acquire private property. Instead, many sold their coupons, either directly to private investors or through financial markets, for cash. This was due in part to a lack of understanding of the process of privatization and the value of the coupons, as well as a lack of trust in the government and the newly created private sector.

In addition, many citizens were struggling with poverty and high inflation, and preferred to receive the cash from selling their coupons to meet their immediate needs. Others sold their coupons to speculators and investors, who saw an opportunity to make a profit by acquiring large stakes in the companies being privatized.

As a result, a small number of individuals and corporations acquired significant ownership stakes in the companies being privatized, and the concentration of wealth and ownership in the hands of a few individuals became a major concern. The outcome of the Russian privatization process was widely criticized for contributing to corruption and hindering the development of a stable and competitive market economy. Despite these challenges, however, the process of privatization remains an important part of Russia's transition to a market economy.

Many Russian oligarchs become rich as a result of the privatization process in the 1990s. Privatization in Russia was characterized by the rapid transfer of state-owned assets to private ownership, often at below-market prices, which created opportunities for individuals and corporations to acquire significant stakes in the country's largest and most valuable enterprises.

A small group of individuals, many of whom became known as oligarchs, took advantage of the opportunities created by privatization to acquire large stakes in Russia's most valuable companies, often through the use of their political connections and by exploiting loopholes in the privatization process. These individuals and corporations quickly became some of the wealthiest in Russia and played a significant role in shaping the country's economy and politics.

Critics of the Russian privatization process argue that the rapid transfer of state-owned assets to private ownership created opportunities for corruption and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a small number of individuals, which has had negative consequences for the development of a stable and competitive market economy. Nevertheless, the process of privatization remains a key aspect of Russia's transition to a market economy, and the country has made significant progress in this transition despite the challenges posed by corruption and the concentration of wealth.

Several business oligarchs became extremely wealthy through the acquisition of state-owned assets in the 90's using this privatization scheme. Some of the most prominent oligarchs include Boris Berezovsky, Vladimir Gusinsky, Roman Abramovich, Mikhail Fridman, and Vladimir Potanin. These businessmen accumulated privatization checks from Russian citizens and used them to acquire Russian government property at deep discounts.

Was the privatization coupon scheme in Russia a way for each citizen to inherit a fair share of the de-communized property or a scheme for the new post-Soviet elites to become rich?

I write, you decide.

Follow me on linkedin.com and youtube.com/legasystems