Private Messages, Public Silence
by Asha Dullabh, Clinical Psychologist
After publishing The Corporate World: At This Rate, Are We Even Living?, I expected engagement in the comments. Instead, what I received were private messages. These messages struck a deep chord—reflecting an unspoken reality many are feeling but few are willing to voice publicly.
Some were from executives. Others were from employees at various levels. But the message was the same—people feel watched.
Here’s what was shared with me (shared with permission, but anonymously):
One response stood out:
"It’s hard for people to be themselves nowadays—in the real world and the digital—because we are constantly being observed and monitored at every turn."
"Speaking freely can easily be misconstrued as being a risky person. It’s scary because such constraints limit robust and progressive dialogue. It can’t be that in the effort to rise to the top, people are losing themselves. Then what’s the point?"
The irony is suffocating. We call for authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation, yet the very systems in place encourage self-censorship, conformity, and fear.
What happens when people stop speaking up? The conversations that could spark real change never happen. People opt for safe, rehearsed answers instead of truth. Workplaces become echo chambers of whatever is “acceptable” to say.
In a world that demands leaders, we’re training people to stay silent.
Where Do We Go to Think Freely?
Another private message took this thought further:
"As the workplace of the future takes shape, I believe we desperately need 'human sanctuaries'—places where digital surveillance can't reach."
"Imagine spaces where our deepest thoughts and ideas can exist without fear of being judged by algorithms or canceled by society. A place to explore freely, where ideas don’t have to be perfect or labeled right away."
"Demanding everyone to be the same leads to dangerous groupthink—where creativity is stifled, and the fear of speaking up silences progress."
This is the unspoken crisis of the modern workplace—people aren’t just afraid to speak; they’re afraid to think out loud.
This is why we need Mental Athenaeums—sanctuaries for thought.
领英推荐
These are spaces—physical or digital—where people can:
? Explore ideas without fear of judgment.
? Disagree, challenge, and refine thinking without career consequences.
? Speak without an algorithm deciding what should be seen.
Because the best ideas—the ones that shake industries and shape the future—were never born in environments of constant surveillance.
The Future of Work: Will We Need Therapy to Detox From It?
A final message exposed the deeper layers of this issue:
"I do think going forward, people will need some sort of therapy because corporations run our perception and perspective in the interests of shareholders."
"The irony of capitalism—create the customers that overconsume and create consumerism as we know it... but this conversation is so layered."
Workplaces are no longer just places of employment. They shape how we think.
And if we’re not careful, we won’t even realize it’s happening.
The corporate world of the future will either:
? Recognize the value of open, honest dialogue, or
? Continue pushing people into private conversations, while public spaces remain silent.
Which direction will we take?
Dentist/Author
4 周Truee.. I realized that most of what's stopping me from expressing myself is mere illusion. Assuming it will be awkward or lame etc. and the moment would pass, and you sometimes think, why hadn't I said it, and that previous reasoning just vaporises, because it was never there. I love your article really. There are several notes I took down from it. Thank you
Health And Wellness Consultant @ Puriti Wellness Consultancy | Wellness Consulting
4 周Love it ??
Founder of VitalityArtist.com?? | best PRODUCTS for nature-based + simple VITALITY | linking win-wins: give HEALTH+ increase INCOME
4 周That's right, I don't like to write things in the comments that are not intended for other eyes. That's the private conversation. It's the same with face-to-face meetings: Not all personal matters are exchanged in a meeting. What you have to discuss with a single person is shifted to the break or afterwards.??