Private Label: Six key strategies for brands to compete

Private Label: Six key strategies for brands to compete

In the battleground that is retail today, retailers are turning to new (and old) strategies to win. Private label has been around for decades, but in recent times, around the world, I’ve seen a significant rise in the use of private label as a key retail strategy (check out this recent article about Target as an example). We are seeing private label being used aggressively comparing prices versus leading brands (see image).?Private label is a very dangerous competitor for brands, and a tricky competitor to play against. So this post will focus on one key strategic question: what can a brand do about private label?

Private label has been around for a long time

Private label has been around for a very long time. Its origins lie in cheap, low quality products, focusing on commodity categories and segments. Over time that spread to cover most categories in the supermarket in some countries. Some categories succumbed completely and (almost) the entire category was taken over by private label. Other countries seemed to be able to hold off the private label invasion, or at least it seemed to have minimal penetration and impact.

Private label is evolving and advancing around the world

But over the decades private label and private label strategies have evolved. Today retailers are creating more sophisticated retail strategies. Retailers such as Tesco and Sainsbury in the UK have attempted to create premium ranges (such as Tesco Finest and Sainsbury’s Taste the difference) targeting a quality which is as good as, if not better than, the best the category has to offer.

Retailers are revisiting private label with renewed vigor

Fast forward to today and there is a renewed vigor to the development of private label. New ranges are announced by retailers seemingly daily. And markets which have historically been immune to private label are now finally succumbing. I was in Indonesia in the last month and the growth and penetration of private label there appears to be growing fast, after being almost insignificant for many years.

Private label isn’t private label anymore

Today private label often isn’t ‘private label’. Retailers create brands (or at least brand names) to create the illusion of exclusivity, and perhaps to create something that might appeal to a shopper who doesn’t want to buy private label, or a retailer whose brand name may not carry the values that make it a great private label brand. Discounters such as Aldi and Lidl are packed full of pseudo brands.

And this approach isn’t limited to the discounters. In the UK, Tesco has revamped much of its value range of low cost private label and has relaunched it as a range of 400 products, under 16 different names, all bound together under the ‘Exclusively at Tesco’ banner. In the US, Target has announced the launch of a new brand – Smartly – with contains a range of 70 personal care products.

What is driving the focus on private label?

In today’s trying times, retailers are finding things tough. New threats, from e-commerce to discounters to convenience stores; new competitors such as Amazon and Ocada are shaking up the retail world. Retailers are under pressure to keep shoppers, and to encourage them to come to their stores. Retailers are under pressure to compete on price, as technology makes pricing more transparent, and discounters and e-commerce fight the fight on pricing. At the same time profit is under pressure, driven by the pain of a price war, and the increased costs of having to fight on multiple fronts (for example opening up an e-commerce operation as well as stores).

What retail strategy can help a retailer attract shoppers, fight on price, AND increase profits?

Enter private label

Private label, in this regard, is brilliant. By definition, private label is only available in one retailer, so creates at least the veneer of exclusivity. Because of the lower costs (jettisoning the margins that a branded manufacturer demands, plus all the overheads and marketing costs that a brand requires) it is possible to simultaneously compete on price, while protecting or even growing margins.

The evolution of private label

Hence the evolution into retailer ‘brands’ – creating more differentiation and more appeal by being able to sow specific brand values into different categories and sectors – while still being able to keep costs (and therefore prices) low.

Private label will continue to advance and encroach

Retail will be tough for a long time, so we can expect retailers to keep pushing private label. Its appeal to a retailer under pressure, when executed well, is hard to resist. But what about the branded manufacturers. How to cope with the impending threat of a renewed focus on private label?

How to cope with the impending threat of a renewed focus on private label?

Accept the reality - We can complain about how unfair it might be, but private label is here, and if it isn’t it may well be coming soon. We can indulge in debates about whether private label products are parasites, feeding on the historic brand value that a brand has created. We can moan about the pack designs that get really close to the brand leader. We might even consider legal action if there is evidence of passing-off or IP infringement. But in most cases, there is little we can do.

Look at your own brand weaknesses - And (playing devil’s advocate here) if your loyal consumers and shoppers can be won over that easily, then perhaps the brand isn’t as strong as it should be. We need to beware of marketing that doesn’t really create consumer or shopper value. If a consumer or a shopper will switch to something cheaper that easily – where did our marketing go wrong?

Recognize the difference between consumers and shoppers - Too often we think of brand preference as a consumer thing, but there are shoppers involved too. And private label plays to this brilliantly. Sometimes the consumer isn’t the shopper: so the person making the purchase decision may not be totally bought into your brand, might not understand its value, and so might switch to private label. Even when the shopper is the consumer, decision processes are different. A person who portrays undying love for your brand in a focus group might suddenly become fickle under the glare of the supermarket’s lights.

Its not all about you - Of course, its easy to see this as a direct attack on your brand (or to think that somehow your category might not be affected). But remember that, as shopping and shops evolve, there may be more environments where the shopper doesn’t get to see your brand. In a discounter, for example, there may be few or no brands at all. The shopper may have been keen to buy your brand if it was there – but what if it isn’t? Will the shopper make a separate trip to another store, just for your brand? Maybe, but the price of that brand loyalty has just got higher, and for many shoppers, it might just be too easy to pick up the private label anyway.

Predict weak points and act now - Many of you may be reading this and thinking that you are immune to this. I hope that is true. But be careful. Private label is a powerful tool and retailers will use it wherever they can. Even if private label is small in your category or market, investigate. Check your brands and see which are vulnerable. Which could easily be copied as a physical product. Which have brand attributes which could easily be eroded, or replaced by price? Act now to plan a private label defense.

Develop category strategies that recognize the role of private label AND your brand - What does all this mean? Yes, we can, and should, compete with private label. But we must acknowledge that it is going to be a growing part of a retailer’s strategy. That is something that branded manufacturers need to accept. So how to create a world that makes sense of this? The answer is to develop category strategies that recognize the role that private label plays for a retailer, as well as recognizing (and amplifying) the value that your brand brings to the category and to the retailer. If you want help building a better category strategy - get in touch now and I'd be happy to share the work we've done with other leading brands.

Brand strategies that overtly fight private label are less likely to receive retail support. But brand manufacturers who can present their brands as something that complements, rather than fights, a retailer’s strategy, are likely to get more support.

To achieve this, of course, manufacturers need to ensure that they understand retailers and their strategies. They need to ensure that their strategy and planning processes encompass shoppers and retailers as well as consumers. If you think you need help achieving this - check out our training programs now. We can help you build strategies that grow categories and brands: turn those strategies into activations that win with shoppers, and presentations that retailers will really engage with.

Brand growth is still paramount but achieving that brand growth needs to be planned within a realistic view of the world. If you need help on building meaningful and retail-realistic growth strategies, get in touch now.

Faheem Moosa

Founder, Consulting Growth Hour | I Help Consultants Add $100k-$500k in New Revenue in 12 Months or Less Without Burning Out | Former Management Consultant

2 年

Very interesting read, Mike. I feel for retailers having to fight on multiple fronts. Private label is a potent weapon. I think in the end consumers will win because the focus will shift more and more to creating the best possible products (both by manufacturers and retailers) that can win.

Ibrahim Faroun

FMCG Sales & Marketing | Team Leader | 10+ Years Experience

2 年

Great article ! I would add a 7th strategy; fight PL with PL. Many companies create tier 2 brand or what they call a "fighting brand" to overtake market share from PLs primarily by competing with prices. Since PL shoppers most important purchase factor is price, fighting it with price makes more sense. Not to add, you can use it to elevate your main brands values by differentiation between the 2 on so many levels and this way you can control the whole category. And while you embrace PL's existence you learn to embrace positive cannibalization and this is the way for category leadership in my opinion in a PL infested market.

If you have the opportunity to corner the two spots on the shelf in any configuration by recipe, packaging, weight, price and ensure your competitors don’t own the space, take up the two spots, not unlike Costco does with it’s paper products that it makes with the same suppliers that supply it’s brands. Today’s PL are of excellent quality and value and with serious inflation they’ll continue to be a shift from those that haven’t tried PL products before and those that will buy more PL than ever before, best to own all the real estate if possible for your items and capacity.

Ivo Petroff

International Retail

2 年

Biggest difference between private brand and national brand is not the label. It’s the mindset behind it. National brands are still mostly product centric. Genesis of private brand is customer centricity. This is also what makes many emerging brands successful. National brands should adopt more of private brand mindset and liberalize their models. Power games of who is in control are such an obsolete playbook. There is just one in control - the Customer. Period.

Siddharth Khera

Regional Manager | International Business | GTM | 10 years of experience in FMCG industry handling business development, marketing and sales operations.

2 年

Agree, UK Private label have made a great mark they have mastered the art there and people are also much aware in UK about the value they get in private labels as compared to national brands. They are far ahead than usa also in private label contribution . Secondly private labels gives a good profitability and margins also as compared to national brands .

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mike Anthony的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了