Privacy: The Investment We Should All Be Making Today
Matthew Rance
Head of Commercial Data & Analytics @ Immediate Media Co | Data Analysis, Strategy & Innovation
Most will recall the enforcement of the GDPR back in May 2018 and admit that, as an industry, we were scrambling until the final days to align on the minimum requirements to avoid fines. A handful of vendors even left it to the day before the deadline to confirm whether they’d be on the IAB’s TCF, reflecting how reactive we all were to such a transformative change.
More than a necessary evil
I think this is indicative of much of the industry’s approach to privacy at nearly every turn. An inconvenience, a headache, a necessary evil that comes with digital monetisation. It is, unfortunately in advertising, often an afterthought. It’s part of the reason why we’ve seen suboptimal consent collection practices, rampant data leakage, and action taken from European regulators more recently. Frustratingly, it’s also partly why big technologies can so easily weaponise privacy and frame the open web and the average publisher as nefarious operators. We don't do ourselves a great degree of favours.
But despite the comprehensive challenges, it does present new opportunities for innovation, and I think we are starting to see this already.
For example, when you’re required to make it as easy for a customer to not provide consent as it is for them to provide it (which is a challenge many publishers are currently required to address), some have realised that this offers an opportunity to rethink the relationship between their content, the customer, and technology. Small but meaningful design changes and alterations to the user journey can have disproportionately positive impacts on customers’ openness to sharing data. And most of these changes are likely only scratching the surface of how we could transform things long-term.
I think that comparing traditional publishers with big tech is often unhelpful as they are fundamentally different businesses, but one thing we could all learn from them is the effective story they tell around privacy and what it means to them. Whether we agree with their view or indeed believe its authenticity is irrelevant. Privacy is placed front and center of Apple’s marketing efforts, and it is a thread that is tirelessly woven through every new product release. The core message of privacy is even espoused by their most senior leaders.
"Privacy is a fundamental human right. It’s also one of our core values" - Apple
But why hasn't the industry cared?
So why haven’t most of us given privacy the scrutiny and rigor it deserves?
One simple word: incentive. Even following the birth of GDPR, the vast majority of publisher inventory has been consented and fully monetizable. Additionally, at a time when we are being bombarded with industry shifts and changes, strategic planning around privacy has had few people’s headspace to occupy. This is understandable, but I would make two important points. Firstly, this will change.
领英推荐
There is a growing number of advertisers, albeit a modest number so far, assessing the publishers they work with based on their data collection and processing practices. It's not totally unreasonable to suggest that there is a future world in which things like limiting how many technologies process your users’ data and vetting when and how they interact with your site will become table stakes. Advertisers could conceivably come to expect a certain degree of standards on this before trading with a media owner.
I believe the narrative around privacy and regulatory action suggests that data provenance with respect to publishers will become an area of increased importance and scrutiny for the brands who need to care about who they are associated with.
Secondly, think of privacy as a point of potential differentiation. While others are caught up in the details of only today’s problems (which are substantial), you as a publisher can gain strategic advantage by giving privacy at least some of your thought too. This should go beyond short focus on what needs to be done right now to stay on the right side of the law.
There is a lot of talk currently about the premium web and what quality even means. Among things like ad density, supply chain transparency, and quality of content, I think it must include a media owner’s approach to user privacy. Regardless of how wonderful our content and ad experience is, if we’re not building foundations around data usage that will genuinely meet the requirements of the law and the changing guidance, then the word “premium” will become hollow.
Your website is a shop window for your data privacy practices. If you’re doing bad stuff, then people will see it. And if advertisers really start paying attention to this, they'll separate the good from the bad incredibly easily. I think there are few, if any, who are vastly ahead of the pack here. This is empowering and motivating for us all.
Things we can do today
So what can we do today that means we’re in better shape for tomorrow? I’ll start with five suggestions:
I'd love to hear your thoughts on how your organisation is handling privacy whether your publisher, advertiser or tech side? What strategies have been successful for you? And how important really is privacy to your organisation right now? (Maybe just DM me on that one if its damming)
Attorney, CPA, FIP, AIGP, CIPT, CIPM, CIPP E / US, Certified Privacy Engineer
4 个月Gotta admit that “Your website is a shop window for your data privacy practices.” is a TERRIFIC line. Major kudos
Privacy, Data Protection, Compliance | CIPP, CIPM, FIP
4 个月Well said, Matt: In the end it’s about aligning business incentives to ensure the term ‘premium publisher’ doesn’t ring hollow with data usage too.
My Team Understands How to Protect Your Marketing Technology From Privacy Impacts. From Cookieless to Consent Management, Australian Brands Choose Us as Their Partner to Navigate Change.
5 个月This was really well thought through. Thank you.
?? Great piece Matthew Rance! As someone who has left the publishing side to help businesses build 'Privacy Programs as a Strategic Advantage' - you are preaching to the choir! It is becoming evident that publishers that are not leaning into privacy are going to suffer "Repetitive Privacy Whiplash" trying to manage fast moving regulatory, industry, client/customer, investor and employee expectations. If they think it's chaotic now.....just wait!! ?? 100% agree that too many publishers see privacy as a necessary, but fundamentally unwanted cost base to be tolerated and endured, rather than capitalised on. There is a real opportunity to create brand differentiation, drive commercial innovation and ultimately drive down costs with streamlined internal privacy process. #privacypositive
Director of Revenue Operations at Immediate Media Co
5 个月Great summary of the current landscape when it comes to privacy Matt, and we seem to have put ourselves in a less than ideal situation by linking privacy with revenue. The broader industry is currently in a fight to maintain as high a number of consented users as possible, knowing that monetisation of these is far superior. Consent has become a commodity, and there is lots for us to do in taking the audience on a journey of understanding how we can preserve their privacy and simultaneously drive business value. Especially in a future world without 3PC, it feels like a publishers position on privacy and building user trust on how data is being used becomes a significant USP.