Principal designers under the Building Regulations: what you need to know
Matt Thompson
Director @ Matt Thompson Communications | Expert Writing, architecture and construction
The new duties and competence requirements for Principal Designers (and all dutyholders) brought in as a result of the Building Safety Act 2022 have been published in
These new regulations are much as previewed back in 2022 when we were writing the competence framework for Principal Designers (PAS 8671), thank goodness!
They amend the Building Regulations (2010), apply in England and Wales, and come into effect on 1 October 2023.
If you're an architect and/or already supply CDM PD services, it's likely that you're already on the case. If not, you’d better limber up PDQ.
Here’s what you need to know.*
Procedural matters
To carry out the duties of a Building Regs PD (as distinct from a PD under the CDM Regs), you must adhere to a number of procedural requirements and be adequately competent.
The regulations allow you to carry out the role as an individual ... but it is much more likely that you will do so as a business of some kind. If so, you must:
NOTE that the term ‘designer’ in this context is almost – but not quite – meaningless. It encompasses anyone who in the course of a business carries out any building design work, or arranges for, or instructs, any person under their control to do so.
o??carry out the design work in accordance with all relevant requirements.
o??fulfil the duties of a designer and PD
NOTE that sufficient ‘organisational capability’ means that your individual staff members have relevant competence between them AND that your organisation operates a robust management system.
Client due diligence
Clients have a duty to check that you have sufficient organisational capability before they can allow you to start work. They must take all reasonable steps to satisfy themselves that you meet the requirements for PDs and are able to fulfil the PD duties.
In relation to a higher-risk building (HRB), they must:
NOTE that “serious sanction” is defined. It means:
PD duties and competence
Once appointed, your duties are to combine technical knowledge and management expertise with the specific objective of achieving compliance with ‘all relevant requirements’. Lots of the language and overall shape of the duties are familiar from the CDM Regulations. You must:
领英推荐
o??the planning, management and monitoring of the building work, and
o??the coordination of building work and design work for the purpose of
ensuring compliance with all relevant requirements.
o??the design work carried out by any workers under your control is planned,
managed and monitored so that the design complies with all relevant
requirements
o??the design work that persons affecting the design work (such as
designers) carry out complies with all relevant requirements
o??persons affecting the design work (such as designers) cooperate with the
whole project team, comply with their duties under the Building
Regulations 2010, and consider the effect of their work on the whole
project
PDs on higher-risk buildings
On top of all this, working as a PD on HRBs entails additional de facto procedural duties and shared responsibilities that are set out in:
For example, PDs on HRBs have a specific duty to carry out inspections to monitor safety occurrences during the construction phase, and to supply to the client designs for the HRB building work before a building control approval application.
In conclusion
There are numerous tricky issues in all of this glorious and well-intentioned bureaucracy likely to bemuse or frustrate – especially given how little time there is to gear up your service. For example, how should you:
The trickiest of all is whether your PI insurer will cover you for being responsible for compliance.
I’m sure new tools and consultancies will be on hand to help and are (even as I type!) rushing to finalize their commercial solutions. I hope they work but, untried and untested as they inevitably are, we should expect, at the very least, ‘teething trouble’ or, as some people have predicted, ‘a car crash’.
One way or another, though, the industry will grind on, hopefully to be safer, healthier and more accountable than it was before the tragedy that started it all: the Grenfell Tower fire.
?
* DISCLAIMER: While I’ve tried to reflect the legislation accurately, you must not rely on the information in this article. Always refer to the source legislation – The Building Regulations etc. (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2023 (SI 2023 No. 911) – and, if need be, consult a properly qualified legal expert.