Preventive care doesn’t save money, bankruptcies aren’t widely caused by lack of insurance, and FQHCs
New LinkedIn Newsletter from Seliger + Associates: Go to?www.seliger.com?to sign up for FREE GRANT ALERTS and click on BLOG to read more than 600 posts about grant writing at Grant Writing Confidential.
“Preventive Care Saves Money? Sorry, It’s Too Good to Be True” tells you everything you need to know in the headline, though you should of course read the article. The point is important because a lot of Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funding for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) is premised on the idea that more primary preventive care will save money and slow the seemingly inexorable rise in healthcare costs. There’s an intuitive, seductive logic to the argument: it seems like it should be true that prevention is superior to treatment. Click here to continue reading.
Copyediting | Post-translation editing | Proposal writing
3 周Dr. Richard C. Scepura might interest you
Copyediting | Post-translation editing | Proposal writing
3 周Thanks for sharing Isaac! David Wilcox wrote a book and writes about this. He has written how the Turqouise web site displays cash prices. Cameron Renaud Check out this for disability and insurance coverage.