Preventing and Detecting Fraud
Salih Ahmed ISLAM
Internal Audit Expert CIA | MBA | GRCP | Consultant | Trainer | Author
What Type of Risk Is Fraud?
There is no universally correct way of including fraud within a risk classification system. Some organizations categorize fraud as a compliance risk, while others consider it a financial risk or an operational risk. There is one universally incorrect approach, however: completely omitting the risk of fraud from the organization’s risk management process. Unfortunately, many risk management professionals tend to underestimate the role of fraud in – or even exclude fraud risks from – the scope of their professional duties.
Fraud Risk Management
As management teams increase their focus on risk, they should take the opportunity to consider, enact, and improve measures to detect, deter, and prevent fraud. This comprehensive approach – looking at fraud from a holistic perspective that includes proactive measures to assess the risk and address it before, during, and after it occurs – is embodied in the concept of fraud risk management. It’s the natural evolution from fragmented programs that have focused on reacting to discovered incidents and ad hoc prevention programs based on past frauds.
The Fraud Risk Management Guide, published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in collaboration with the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), describes fraud risk management as a process that involves five overarching principles:
When taken together, these five principles form a comprehensive framework for managing an organization’s fraud risks.
Fraud and Internal Controls
As noted in the third principle in the COSO-ACFE fraud risk management framework outlined earlier, a significant part of an effective anti-fraud program is a system of internal control activities designed and implemented specifically to address the organization’s fraud risks.
One of the most comprehensive definitions of internal control is found in the COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework:
Internal control is a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives relating to operations, reporting, and compliance.
领英推荐
According to this definition, the design of internal controls should be to assist management in meeting the following three categories of objectives:
Fraud risk can affect each of these categories of objectives. Thus, an effective system of internal controls can and should greatly reduce an organization’s vulnerability to fraud. No system of internal controls can fully eliminate the risk of fraud, but well-designed and effective internal controls can deter the average fraudster by reducing the opportunity to commit fraud.
Preventive versus Detective Controls
There are two main types of internal controls: preventive controls and detective controls. When designing internal controls, both types are needed in any organization since they attack errors and fraud from different perspectives.
Preventive controls are manual or automated processes, systems, policies, and procedures that are designed to prevent fraud before it occurs. Examples of these controls include:
Detective controls are designed and implemented to identify fraud that is occurring.
Examples of detective controls include:
CA, CMA, FAFD & MBA. Presently Heading-Internal Audit, Risk & Control and IMS at Egis group in India # JITF Infralogistics # Jaypee # HCL Infosystems # Internal Audit # Risk & controls # Fraud investigation #IMS
2 年Do you have fraud prevention and detection framework, if please share the same.
Perry Owie, FCA, CIA