Will President Trump’s policies move markets?

Will President Trump’s policies move markets?

This post was co-authored with my colleague Mike Ryan, Head of UBS Wealth Management Research Americas.

America’s 45th president was moving markets even before he took office. US equities rose in the first five weeks after Donald Trump’s election win. But while the new commander-in-chief has hit the ground running since his inauguration with a spate of executive actions, the most important changes of the administration’s legislative agenda will require more than just the stroke of a pen. So how might Trump’s policies impact investors over coming years?

Trump has outlined a packed policy agenda, with initiatives ranging from defense spending, corporate tax reform, regulatory relief, and an infrastructure build-out. With such an ambitious platform, compromises will need to be made and investors are already eager to see how the administration and Congress will add flesh to the bones of Trump’s campaign pledges. While the devil will be in the detail, we believe key policy initiatives could boost US GDP by 0.5% and add an incremental 5–15% to S&P 500 earnings per share over the next few years.

"A key investor focus will be tax reform."

A key investor focus will be tax reform, where Congress will need to strike a careful balance – lowering headline tax rates without causing an excessive rise in government deficit or disadvantaging certain industries. The proposal for a “repatriation tax holiday” could help by widening the domestic corporate tax base and helping pay for modest cuts to taxation rates. However, a lack of politically palatable options to generate revenue in other areas limits the opportunity for more significant measures. These challenges are the focus of our POTUS 45 report, The outlook for tax reform.

Regulatory relief, another flagship Trump issue, should be more straightforward. Trump has already proposed policies to trim red tape for companies. But repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which has a major impact on companies and individuals, are still fraught with risk. Increased trepidation around the ACA’s replacement could result in significant economic fallout.

Boosting infrastructure and defense spending were popular aspects of Trump’s campaign, and we expect details to start emerging soon. Public-private infrastructure programs have enjoyed limited success thus far as businesses have been reluctant to get caught up in the ulterior agenda of many public officials. The new Administration could alter this dynamic to turn rhetoric into reality, by employing a “no strings attached” approach.

"The scope and scale of the proposals raise the risk of policy misstep or market disappointment."

The scope and scale of the proposals raise the risk of policy misstep or market disappointment. But ultimately this new policy paradigm should stimulate US economic growth and boost the performance of growth-sensitive financial assets. 

Our US equity sector positioning reflects the need to position for fundamental growth while considering the balance of policy risks and opportunities. For example, we are overweight on technology and healthcare, where repatriation can boost earnings; energy, which could benefit from immediate expensing for capital expenditures; and financials, where regulatory relief could provide a positive catalyst.

Bottom Line

The post-election market rally has not fully priced in the successful implementation of the Trump administration’s pro-growth policy prescriptions. These policies are poised to bolster the already-strong growth outlook, and add support to our preference for risk assets. We are tactically overweight on global equities, US equities, and Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities relative to US government bonds.

 

Please view: ubs.com/cio-disclaimer

Robyn Butler

Entrepreneurial Enthusiast

8 年

Delicate balance .. financial strength has a direct tie to national security, and the short term pro-growth strategy looks favorable. Trump has put his inherited EO pen to work but didn't learn the failures of Obama admin - namely, polarizing congress and the country. He can't accomplish long term impact without sound agreed upon legislation. How long can we sustain his "pro-growth policies" and who ultimately inherits the ever growing tsunami of debt, planetary woes and divisive populace?

Travis Lahey

Landscaper and Rotarian

8 年

Cost of moving entire industries is astronomical compared to simply just raising wholesale pricing by a fraction of a percentage (0.0005%) per item to cover cost of new said taxes. Math may not be exact but I believe the concept is doable. Bad for the consumer, more efficient for the manufacturer, foreign workers, shipping, keeping relations with counties currently producing. Kind of ruins the whole "bringing jobs back" campaign but at the end of the day people won't pay more for an American made product. In my opinion of course.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mark Haefele的更多文章

  • Buying the dip in US stocks

    Buying the dip in US stocks

    The S&P 500 rose 0.5% last week—its first positive performance in five weeks —and is now 2.

    4 条评论
  • Monthly Investment Letter: Prepare for Trump 2.0

    Monthly Investment Letter: Prepare for Trump 2.0

    Since Donald Trump won the US presidential election and the Republicans gained control of Congress, long-end government…

    4 条评论
  • Charting 2025 after robust returns in 2024

    Charting 2025 after robust returns in 2024

    Markets ended the year in a more cautious mood, as investors scaled back expectations for the Federal Reserve's pace of…

    6 条评论
  • Monthly Investment Letter: What we will be watching over the holidays

    Monthly Investment Letter: What we will be watching over the holidays

    In our Year Ahead outlook, we detailed how we believe investors should prepare for 2025, including positioning for…

    6 条评论
  • Building resilient portfolios as red sweep reshapes markets

    Building resilient portfolios as red sweep reshapes markets

    The Republican Party held onto their narrow majority in the US House of Representatives, giving President-elect Donald…

    3 条评论
  • Big tech earnings underscore robust AI growth

    Big tech earnings underscore robust AI growth

    Market reaction to the US third-quarter tech reporting season has been mixed despite an overall beat in results. The…

    4 条评论
  • Monthly Investment Letter: Get ready

    Monthly Investment Letter: Get ready

    Looking toward the fourth quarter, investors need to get ready. The Federal Reserve has begun to reduce interest rates.

    7 条评论
  • Monthly Investment Letter: Catching up

    Monthly Investment Letter: Catching up

    Investors returning from summer vacations might not notice much change in financial markets over the past month…

    8 条评论
  • Monthly Investment Letter: Poles apart

    Monthly Investment Letter: Poles apart

    We have had an unforgettable month in US political history. Former President Donald Trump was wounded in an attempted…

    3 条评论
  • Monthly Investment Letter: Decision time

    Monthly Investment Letter: Decision time

    As we look ahead to the second half of 2024, it’s decision time—for the Federal Reserve, for the US electorate, and for…

    10 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了