Preparing for What’s Next

Preparing for What’s Next

On May 20th, I delivered the keynote at New York University’s Stern Business School convocation. Here are excerpts from my message to the graduates. 

We’re in a volatile, global economy – the most uncertain I have ever seen. There is distrust of institutions. Protectionism is rising. Globalization is being attacked as never before. For those looking to succeed, the playbook from the past just won’t cut it. It’s time to pivot, be bold, and not fear criticism. 

I built my career at GE in a time when productivity, innovation and globalization were the way to win. When I joined the company in 1982, 80 percent of our revenue came from the U.S. Now, 70 percent of our revenue will be global. We have customers in more than 180 countries. We export over $20 billion worth of goods to the world each year. We have become woven into the global economy.

You would think that companies like GE that give people good jobs, make good products, and contribute to their communities would be valued. That governments would try to nurture growth and address big problems like income inequality and unemployment. That global integration would be seen as a force of good and would continue to grow.

You would be wrong. Today, big companies are distrusted; governments and global institutions are failing to address the world’s challenges; and globalization is being attacked as never before.

This is not just true for the U.S., but everywhere. These sentiments have traction in Europe and Latin America, on both the right and the left. The future of the EU is an open question. Protectionist barriers are rising in Asia and Africa. China is repositioning its economy to be more sustainable and inclusive.

The global economy is growing too slowly, and many people feel left behind. Some workers have been displaced by outsourcing, the middle class has been squeezed, and income inequality has risen to unacceptable levels. As technology and globalization race forward, people understandably fear their impact on jobs and incomes, and distrust the motives of companies and government.

There are many causes, and business bears some blame. Productivity has slowed to a crawl and capital investment is declining. Financing is more difficult to get, particularly for infrastructure projects. Investment is required for productivity, which in turn, supports higher wages.

Part of the fault also lies with technology. Innovation has driven growth but also leads to greater instability. The internet can connect people, but doesn’t necessarily give them jobs. Technology has raised the competitive requirements for companies and people. This exacerbates economic insecurity.

Finally, Government is also responsible. In the U.S., regulation has expanded while infrastructure has lagged. Our trade deals are languishing in Congress, and we remain the only developed country in the world without a functioning Export Bank. Our tax code is 30 years old; our immigration system is broken; and a huge structural deficit clouds the future. In the face of this headwind, we are having a raucous Presidential election where every candidate is a protectionist, and globalization is being blamed for unemployment and wage inequality.

Globalization is still essential to growth. But, the globalization I knew, based on trade and global integration, is changing, which is why it’s time for a bold pivot. And in the face of a protectionist global environment, flexible thinking is required, and companies must navigate the world on their own. We must level the playing field, without government engagement. This requires dramatic transformation. This is how we will lead:

We will localize. In the future, sustainable growth will require a local capability inside a global footprint. At GE, we will always be a strong American manufacturer, but we also have built factories in China, India, South Africa, Nigeria, Hungary and elsewhere around the world. We are managing extended supply chains. We are not pursuing low wages; we are using a manufacturing strategy to open markets. We will produce for the U.S. in the U.S, but our exports may decline. At the same time, we will localize production in big, end-use markets like Saudi Arabia.

Our competitive advantage is digital productivity. When we digitize power plants and hospitals by connecting them to the Industrial Internet, we improve global productivity. In Pakistan, we are using analytics to improve energy efficiency and expanding capacity. In India, we can use the internet to deliver healthcare to remote regions. In China, engine analytics are improving airline productivity. Every industrial company must also be a digital leader. This is the next wave of competitiveness.

We accelerate growth by solving local problems. We can make the world work better when we innovate to solve problems with local capability. Our GE technologists around the world have come up with new ways to produce cleaner energy that’s more accessible and to give remote communities access to healthcare. Solutions from the developing world improve outcomes in developed markets.

Financing is the new oxygen of global growth. Capital is the fuel for globalization of the future. We have positioned GE to capitalize on investment flows from new sources. China’s “One Belt One Road” initiative is building new relationships in Central Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Most countries are increasing their export financing. We’ve learned how to invest in these countries, access those pools of capital to support export growth. This is critical as we cannot count on the U.S. EXIM Bank. Companies need to globalize on their own and control our destiny.

Winning requires simpler organizations. Change requires new business models that are leaner, faster, more decentralized. Complex and centralized bureaucracies are obsolete. GE is pushing capability to local teams who are empowered to take risks without second guessing.

We tend to think of globalization as a philosophy, but it is much more about what you do on the ground. Success requires hundreds of little things, and decisions made with a local context. A good global leader has an appreciation for how people do their work in a local culture. They try to make a teams’ work meaningful to their country. This allows us to hire the best talent in every country where we compete.

By taking these bold actions – by pivoting – I am confident we can continue to grow. One thing I know about globalization is that there will always be plenty of critics. Early in my career, I worried way too much about what people thought. Over time I realized that progress counts for more than perfection and that anything worthwhile takes persistence and resilience.

My shield consists of competency, hard work and fairness. I run a meritocracy with the highest standards. Discrimination has no place in business – in the U.S. or anywhere else in the world. Similarly, our factory teams know that, while we cannot guarantee markets, we can guarantee effort; we always play to win.

So be flexible, be bold, don’t fear criticism. We are going through a transformational change in globalization, which will require fresh, new thinking. Our goal is to build an economic ecosystem that is the most competitive in the world. To create great jobs through private enterprise and ingenuity. To give back competency and innovation directed at solving the world’s toughest problems. There is nothing elitist, or establishment, about this task. Only by being in the arena can you create work for others.

The discord we see in the U.S. today is primarily due to slow growth and the wealth discrepancy it creates. This problem will not be solved by any bureaucracy. It requires leaders who see the world as it is and are willing to drive change.

Le Ann Janke

CNC Machinist at Power Test Inc.

7 年
回复
Jose Fernando Tomás

CEO of Agricultural & Irrigation Solutions at Alkhorayef Group

8 年

Dear Jeff, thank you for your thoughts. Globalization can′t be stopped. I agree new rules will be coming, and they will condition the way companies continue growing on global markets. I agree that probably we will globalize our companies by making them more local, with a much more important local content in every aspect of the company, but integrated in the Global strategy of our Groups. We will need management teams that understand each country specific culture and integrates it into the corporate global strategy, and that could be the main challenge. And I do even think this aspect will be very positive for the world. So even if it is on a different way, our companies will continue participating on the Global economy. We just need to prepare on whats next...

Alex Vari

Owner, self employed

8 年

Mr Immelt, I would in general agree with most of what you have said. I am however still puzzled by GEs' attitude towards potential for innovation when it does not originate from within its own ranks. This attitude is clearly shown on its website when it comes to dealing with Inventors who approach GE. In my opinion a seriously arrogant and surprising attitude from a firm seemingly committed to innovation in general. Perhaps GE is so full of genius innovators that innovation can only spring forth from within its own personnel. I have raised this issue with GE several times before and their silence is deafening. Looking at the very broad range of truly innovative projects that GE has come up over the years I am left wondering where have all these innovative concepts originated and how are the choices made as to which project to pursue? I am left wondering.

回复
Atul Kaushik

Development cooperation, Trade and development, intellectual property rights, public policy, court systems, governance, project management

8 年

Great speech, Mr Immelt. Way to go! Given India;s Digital India and Make in India campaigns, you are most welcome to experiment the leveling of the playing field without Government engagement.

回复

Well reflected! This is a strong statement from a business leader!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jeff Immelt的更多文章

  • Electricity: We need more smart people

    Electricity: We need more smart people

    Let me start by stating the obvious. If we live in an era of electrification, our electricity policies can’t be stupid.

    2 条评论
  • Leaders Win the Transitions

    Leaders Win the Transitions

    If you are lucky as a leader, you get to manage momentum. But, the best CEOs win market transitions.

    5 条评论
  • Learning from Leaders & Friends

    Learning from Leaders & Friends

    The benefit of experience is realizing what you know and what you don't know. Further, time gives you the chance to…

    15 条评论
  • Training Builds Culture

    Training Builds Culture

    I work with multiple start-ups and small businesses, as an investor and board member. Coming out of Covid, many…

    11 条评论
  • Financial Volatility: Lessons from the Past

    Financial Volatility: Lessons from the Past

    I feel too old to be surprised, but the speed of the SVB failure surprised me. Wow… two days! This doesn’t seem…

    15 条评论
  • First, Be Competent

    First, Be Competent

    Some say we are living in the era of “poly-crisis.” In other words, multiple crises happening at one time.

    32 条评论
  • Jack Was Pretty Damn Good

    Jack Was Pretty Damn Good

    In the midst of a bear market, a possible recession, war in Europe, a pending historic decision from the U.S.

    200 条评论
  • Hot Seat Epilogue

    Hot Seat Epilogue

    A year ago, I published a book, “Hot Seat,” about my time leading GE. The paperback version came out this month.

    28 条评论
  • A Book You Should Read

    A Book You Should Read

    I read "The 1619 Project" over the holidays. I’m glad I did.

    19 条评论
  • Energy Transition Needs a Transition

    Energy Transition Needs a Transition

    Climate change is real and is caused by man. We are not making enough progress, certainly not in a meaningful and…

    33 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了