The Pre-Interview Debate: Pros and Cons of Sharing Questions with Candidates

Interviews are a critical component of the hiring process, allowing employers to gauge the qualifications, skills, and fit of prospective employees. One emerging trend is the practice of providing candidates with interview questions in advance. This approach has sparked debate among HR professionals, with arguments both for and against it. Here, we explore the pros and cons of this practice to help you decide if it’s right for your organisation.

Pros of Sharing Interview Questions in Advance

Reduced Anxiety and Improved Performance

Providing interview questions beforehand can significantly reduce candidates’ anxiety. Knowing what to expect allows candidates to prepare thoroughly, resulting in a more accurate representation of their skills and experience. This preparation time can lead to improved performance during the interview, as candidates are less likely to be caught off guard and can present their best selves.

Fairness and Inclusivity

Giving candidates the questions in advance can level the playing field. It ensures that all candidates have an equal opportunity to prepare, which is particularly beneficial for those who may not excel in high-pressure situations. This practice also supports a more inclusive hiring process, accommodating candidates with disabilities, neurodivergent individuals, and those for whom English is a second language.

Efficiency and Focus

When candidates are well-prepared, interviews can proceed more smoothly and efficiently. The conversation can focus on deeper insights rather than basic qualifications, leading to more meaningful discussions. This enhanced dialogue allows interviewers to probe further into a candidate’s responses, gaining a better understanding of their capabilities and fit for the role.

Cons of Sharing Interview Questions in Advance

Potential for Inauthentic Responses

One of the main criticisms of providing interview questions in advance is the risk of candidates delivering rehearsed answers that do not accurately reflect their spontaneous thinking or genuine capabilities. The natural flow of conversation might be hindered, making it difficult to gauge how candidates think on their feet and handle unexpected questions.

Unfair Advantage

If only some candidates receive the questions in advance due to oversight or miscommunication, it could create an unfair advantage and compromise the integrity of the hiring process. Additionally, candidates who over-prepare might overshadow equally qualified candidates who are more honest or authentic but less prepared.

Diminished Insight into Problem-Solving Skills

Some roles require the ability to think quickly and solve problems under pressure. Providing questions in advance might not accurately assess a candidate’s ability to perform in such environments. Spontaneous interactions can reveal personality traits and interpersonal skills that prepared answers might conceal.

Balancing the Pros and Cons

The decision to provide interview questions in advance is not one-size-fits-all. It largely depends on the nature of the role, the culture of the organisation, and the specific needs of the candidates. To balance the benefits and drawbacks, HR professionals can consider a hybrid approach, mixing advance questions with spontaneous ones. This strategy allows candidates to prepare while also assessing their real-time problem-solving skills and adaptability.

Conclusion

The debate over providing interview questions in advance highlights the complexities of creating a fair and effective hiring process. While this practice can enhance fairness and reduce anxiety, it may also lead to overly rehearsed answers and a lack of spontaneity. HR professionals must weigh these factors carefully to determine the best approach for their organisation. Ultimately, the goal is to create an interview environment that is both fair and effective in identifying the best candidates for the job.

By thoughtfully considering the pros and cons, organisations can tailor their interview process to better meet the needs of both the company and the candidates, ensuring a successful and equitable hiring experience for all involved.