Practical Solutions: The Speedy Benefits of Informal Disciplinary Actions

As employers navigate the complex landscape of workplace discipline, the decision between informal and formal approaches takes on strategic significance. This article expands on the examination of the nuanced interplay between informal and formal disciplinary actions, highlighting an additional advantage of informal methods – their inherent efficiency and cost-effectiveness As we probe into this facet, it becomes clear that informal disciplinary actions not only adhere to labour legislation but also offer a faster and more economical resolution when compared to their formal alternatives.

The Dynamics of Informal Disciplinary Actions:?

Informal disciplinary actions, characterised by open dialogue and a flexible approach, offer a rapid and efficient means of addressing workplace misconduct. In certain situations, the swift resolution provided by informal actions becomes a considerable advantage. This is particularly pertinent when considering the time and costs associated with formal disciplinary hearings.

?

Compliance with Labour Legislation:

One of the notable benefits of informal disciplinary action is that, if executed properly, it aligns with labour legislation while streamlining the resolution process. The Labour Relations Act of 1995 emphasises the right to a fair procedure for employees, but this fairness does not necessitate a strictly formal approach. As long as the employee is afforded a lucid comprehension of the charges and a chance to respond informally, informal disciplinary action offers a quicker and more accessible route for resolution.

?

Time and Cost Considerations:

Example: Unauthorised Absenteeism and Written Warning

Consider the scenario of unauthorised absenteeism – a generally regarded less severe misconduct. For the first offence, the employee may be issued a written warning by calling them into the office or any private space, inquiring about the reason for the absenteeism. If deemed invalid, proceed to issue the written warning. It is advisable to have a witness present during this process. This swift and straightforward approach contrasts sharply with a formal hearing, which requires drafting a notice, setting out charges in sufficient detail, affording the employee reasonable time to prepare, and arranging for an impartial chairperson and witnesses if relevant. The latter, as highlighted, is time-consuming and unnecessary.

?

Example: External Chairperson Costs and Availability

Opting for an external chairperson in a formal hearing incurs fees and relies on their availability. An informal written warning sidesteps these costs and delays, ensuring a more economical solution.

?

Example: Postponements and Procedural Bottlenecks

Formal hearings, with their structured nature, often encounter procedural bottlenecks and postponements. In our example, the informal written warning skips these hurdles, providing a direct and efficient resolution.

?

Policy Considerations:

Employers, however, remain bound by their policies and procedures. If these documents solely prescribe formal processes and exclude informal approaches, it might be time for a policy revision. Aligning policies with the practical benefits of informal actions ensures that the organisation is responsive to evolving workplace needs while maintaining compliance.

?

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the expeditious and cost-effective nature of informal disciplinary actions stands out as a significant advantage in certain circumstances. While formal approaches are indispensable for severe instances of misconduct, the recognition of the swiftness and efficiency of informal actions becomes crucial. Balancing legal compliance, fairness, and practical considerations, employers can leverage the benefits of informal disciplinary actions to promptly address issues while conserving valuable time and resources. This nuanced approach not only aligns with labour legislation but contributes to a workplace culture that is responsive, fair, and pragmatic.

Günther is a senior attorney at Patton Williams Inc. and has over 13 years of experience in labour law. Contact him by phone at 079 808 5704 or by email at gunther@pattonwilliams.co.za.