Power Your Backend (API) With C++.

Power Your Backend (API) With C++.

Developing a backend HTTP request API in C++ can be achieved using several efficient libraries and approaches. Here's a breakdown of some popular options and their pros/cons:

1. C++ REST SDK (Casablanca):

  • Pros: Microsoft-backed: Well-maintained and actively developed by Microsoft. Asynchronous model: Handles concurrent requests efficiently using tasks and promises. JSON support: Built-in JSON serialization/deserialization simplifies data handling. WebSocket support: If you need real-time communication features.
  • Cons: Dependency: Requires the C++ REST SDK library. Learning curve: May take some time to get familiar with its concepts.

Example (Basic GET request):

#include <cpprest/http_client.h>

using namespace web::http;

void make_request() {
    http_client client(U("https://example.com/api"));
    client.request(methods::GET).then([](http_response response) {
        if(response.status_code() == status_codes::OK) {
            return response.extract_string();
        }
        return pplx::task_from_result(std::string()); 
    }).then([](std::string body) {
        std::cout << body << std::endl;
    }).wait();
}        

2. Boost.Beast:

  • Pros: Part of Boost: Leverages the well-established Boost libraries. Lightweight: Low overhead and minimal dependencies. Flexible: Offers fine-grained control over HTTP parsing and generation.
  • Cons: Lower level: Requires more manual handling of HTTP details. Steeper learning curve: If you're not familiar with Boost.Asio.

3. Drogon:

  • Pros: High performance: Designed for speed and efficiency. Non-blocking IO: Handles many concurrent connections effectively. MVC framework: Includes routing, controllers, and views for building full applications.
  • Cons: Less mature: Newer library with potentially a smaller community. May be overkill: If you just need a simple API.

4. Pistache:

  • Pros: Modern C++: Uses C++17 features for cleaner code. Header-only: Easy to integrate into projects. RESTful design: Focuses on building REST APIs.
  • Cons: Smaller community: Less support compared to more established libraries. May lack features: If you need advanced capabilities beyond REST.

5. cpp-httplib:

  • Pros: Header-only: Extremely easy to integrate. Simple API: Straightforward for basic HTTP requests.
  • Cons: Limited features: Not suitable for complex APIs or high performance needs.

Choosing the Right Library:

Consider these factors:

  • Project complexity: Do you need a simple API or a full-fledged web framework?
  • Performance requirements: How important is speed and scalability?
  • Ease of use: How quickly do you need to get started?
  • Features: Do you need specific features like WebSockets or JSON handling?

Additional Tips:

  • Security: Always prioritize security when developing backend APIs. Validate input, sanitize data, and use HTTPS.
  • Error Handling: Implement robust error handling to gracefully manage failures and provide informative responses.
  • Testing: Thoroughly test your API to ensure it works correctly under various conditions.

Adeola Ibigbemi

Founder | Consultant | Process Engineer | IT Operations| Data Expert | C++ | ACCA(in view)

9 个月

Thanks for sharing. There's oatpp and crowpp too. Those two are nice as well

Eldar Gafiyatov

Software Engineer | C++ Engineer

9 个月

C++ rest sdk is in maintenance mode, so shouldn't be suggested at all, didn't see drogon as I skimmed through the article

Pooya Eimandar

Stay Hungry Stay Foolish

9 个月

Facebook Proxygen is incredibly powerful, and we have been using it for our backend at Arium . https://github.com/facebook/proxygen

Hakan Gedek

C++ Developer at Schneider Electric

9 个月

Problem is bringing all together in c++. Rust c# go python...have package & project management tools internally. Using nuget, cargo, pip etc Vs ( Conan, vcpkg...) + cmake. I hate cmake. And whenever I think about using 3rd parties in c++ projects, I feel shiver.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ayman Alheraki的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了