The Power of Behavioral Insights in Policy Making

One of the most contemporary ideas in policymaking is using “nudging” to alter people’s behaviour in a predictable way and, at the same time, not restrict their options. Richard Thaler and Carr Sunstein, in their book "Nudge”, popularised the idea of a nudge to ethically influence people’s decision-making ability. According to them, changing human behaviour can be crucial in successfully implementing development policies. Nudging has often been employed as a strategy to influence people’s decisions in a way that promotes their welfare and at the same time preserves their freedom of choice. The idea is that how choices are presented, known as choice architecture, affects decision-making. It can help people make favourable decisions without coercion or restricting their options.?

Let us look at a few examples of how nudging successfully influenced decision-making:?

• In? Britain, the government was concerned about citizens not saving enough for retirement. The British government used the " nudge " strategy to get people to enrol in pension schemes. They made enrolment in pension schemes an opt-out option rather than an opt-in. This meant that if someone did not want to enrol in the pension scheme, they could opt out. This increased pension savings without curbing the people’s right to freedom of choice. The choice architecture was designed so that people chose to be part of the pension scheme rather than opt-out. It was a subtle way of influencing decision-making. In 2022, the UK government implemented stronger nudge regulations to boost the uptake of complementary guidance for pension scheme members nearing retirement. These regulations are designed to encourage people to seek professional advice if they are considering shifting their pension benefits to another scheme.
• Nudging is often used in health policy, particularly in addressing non-communicable diseases. Behavioural nudges like automatic enrolment in preventive screenings and vaccinations have proven beneficial, as people are more likely to get screened for diseases like cancer if they are automatically scheduled for appointments unless they opt out of it. Similarly, nutrition labels on food products can help consumers make healthier choices.

THE ETHICAL DILEMMA

The proponents of the approach often view it as an ethical approach and an instrument for evidence-based policymaking, considering people’s behaviour and preserving the liberty to choose. Others view nudging as psychological manipulation, curbing an individual’s autonomy. Martin Wilkinson, a professor of politics at the University of Aukland, asked a very important question: Is nudging ethically wrong? He published a blog for the London School of Economics on “Nudges manipulate except when they don't”, where he argues that nudges are not necessarily manipulative. What determines whether it is manipulative would depend on the techniques used to influence decision-making. For example, presenting risk information would help people make informed choices, while scaring people into action through misleading statistics would be categorised as manipulative. Hence, it becomes essential to understand the intent behind nudging. If policymakers try to nudge people to protect them from making impulsive decisions or providing default options for their well-being, then it should not be categorised as impulsive. However, if the intent is to control someone’s behaviour using deceptive methods, then the approach can be categorised as manipulative ( Wilkinson, 2013).

It can, hence, be argued that tactics that can lead to significant benefits, such as enhancing safety or improving health outcomes, can be justified. A person's autonomy is not necessarily violated if they have the agency to choose between various options.

While nudging can help policymakers design effective policy interventions, it is important to know how to use the technique in policymaking.?

The German Institute of Development and Sustainability ?has developed a six-step procedure after extensive research for 10 years in countries of the Global South to guide policymakers in creating behaviour-centred measures, policies, or programmes:

• Define the overall aim of the policy: All the stakeholders in the policymaking process should have a unified understanding and clarity on the policy's aims and objectives. This helps identify the necessary steps to reach the common goal.
• Identify the people we have on board and key behavioural issues by conducting a detailed target group analysis.
• Put yourself in the shoes of the target group to comprehend the behavioural process and identify barriers and drivers
• Co-developing behavioural policies with local partners to incentivise and enable the shift from current to target behaviour. Such policies should address capability, opportunity, and motivation.
• Testing of different elements of behavioural policy: Before rollout, the different elements of behavioural policy should be tested to identify the most effective aspects and improve policy accordingly. Methods used include randomised controlled trials, surveys, and before-and-after comparisons.
• Scaling of tested policies: Once intervention packages are tested, they are ready to be rolled out.?

As the future of nudging in policymaking grows, policymakers must be aware of the challenges while exploring new applications. Nudging represents a promising approach to improving decision-making outcomes without curtailing individual freedom. Its effectiveness and ethical implications will remain key areas of discussion and development in behavioural policy.

If you are interested un exploring the most effective ways to design successful behavioural policies, refer to the following blog:

References:?

1. German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS). (n.d.). Smart packages: six steps to design effective behavioural policies. https://www.idos-research.de/policy-brief/article/smart-packages-six-steps-to-design-effective-behavioural-policies/
2. Why policy makers should nudge more. (n.d.). The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. https://www.chicagobooth.edu/review/why-policy-makers-should-nudge-more#:~:text=Nudging%20is%20the%20word%20used,might%20nudge%20them%20toward%20participating.
3. Nudges manipulate, except when they don’t. (2013, August 29). British Politics and Policy at LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/nudges-manipulate-except-when-they-dont/#:~:text=Nudgers%20may%20recognise%20that%20some,the%20nudgers%20aren't%20manipulative.
4. Becky Morrison, Department for Work and Pensions. (2013, October 22). How a small nudge is helping people save for their retirement. https://quarterly.blog.gov.uk/2013/10/22/how-a-small-nudge-is-helping-people-save-for-their-retirement/

Written by: