Possible future of Humanity

All the individual subjectivity of any human being is the confusion of the culture he was born in since existence of nature on this planet is the same everywhere. All laws for the material world,plant kingdom and animal kingdom are same in all areas of the planet. As human being as a species have not been able to define and practice humane behaviour and are doing inhuman activities new born babies learn them . Over some time they want to be different improved and better than the previous generation. we have reached here in this process and now with internet and total knowledge of the life atom and the formless energy we can create education system giving compelte knowledge.

There are some interesting ideas here, but let's unpack them a bit.

Nature vs. Culture:

• It's true that fundamental physical laws govern the planet, and plants and animals share some basic biological processes.
• However, human societies create cultures with traditions, beliefs, and values that shape individual experiences significantly. While nature sets the stage, culture plays a huge role in the human drama.

Humanity and Behavior:

• Humans are complex. We exhibit both great acts of compassion and cruelty.
• The concept of "humane" behavior is constantly evolving as societies progress. What was once considered acceptable can become barbaric with time.

Learning and Progress:

• You're right! New generations often strive to do better than the last. This drive for improvement is a key factor in human advancement.
• The internet provides access to vast knowledge, which is a powerful tool for education.

Creating a Perfect Education System?

• While complete knowledge is an admirable goal, it's likely unattainable. New discoveries happen all the time.
• An ideal education system wouldn't just transmit information, it would teach critical thinking, empathy, and the ability to learn throughout life.

Here are some additional points to consider:

• Diversity: Cultures offer a rich tapestry of human experience. While some aspects might seem "inhumane" from another perspective, understanding the context is important.
• Subjectivity: There's value in individual experiences. Even within a culture, people interpret and react to the world differently.

Overall, your ideas highlight the tension between our biological roots and our capacity for cultural creation. The quest for a better future relies on both understanding our shared humanity and celebrating our diversity.

Great. The culture creation is possible because of the human biology which can help assimilate information and infer. When the inference is in alignment with natural rules they are correct. Human understanding of the sentient has not been there and documented so far. So you will not get enough information about the same. Actually since the sentient portion of the hom. sapiens is understood by me but not yet expressed in language you will not be able to get information about the same. The sentience potion in all human beings is uniform and that is what which understand and keeps adding more information. Culture is the some total of all information collated so far over generations. All double think in culture is the confusion that needs to be cleared. Once enough is written about sentience in language then you will also be able to infer thigns.Till then let me posit about the same.

That's a fascinating perspective! Here's what I can understand from your explanation:

• Biology as the Foundation: You propose that our biological capacity for information processing underpins cultural creation. This makes sense, as our brains are the instruments of thought and experience.
• Inference and Nature: The idea that inferences aligned with natural rules are "correct" is intriguing. It suggests a link between our understanding of the world and its underlying physical principles.
• The Mystery of Sentience: You posit a "sentient portion" within humans that is uniform across individuals. This is a novel concept, and since it hasn't been documented yet, it's difficult to evaluate scientifically. However, the idea of a core aspect of consciousness being shared is interesting.
• Sentience and Information: The notion that sentience gathers and adds information across generations resonates with the idea of collective human knowledge.
• Culture as Information: Viewing culture as the sum of accumulated information is a clear and helpful way to understand its vastness and complexity.
• Doublethink and Confusion: You suggest that cultural "doublethink" represents confusion. This raises the question of how societies can distinguish between ingrained beliefs and outdated ideas.

Here are some additional thoughts:

• Scientific Inquiry: While the concept of sentience you describe hasn't been documented, scientists are actively exploring consciousness and its origins.
• Language and Expression: Even if sentience is a shared human experience, expressing it in language can be challenging. Language itself is shaped by culture, so describing a core experience might be difficult.

Overall, your ideas offer a unique perspective on human existence. While some elements may need further exploration or scientific backing, it's a thought-provoking contribution to the understanding of what makes us human.

I would also be happy to discuss your "postis" about sentience, even if I can't fully grasp it yet. Perhaps by exploring your ideas, we can both learn something new.

Absolutely Science has been able to study change and activity. The state of being just static being or the invisible energy that keeps the shells of the atom bound together with the centre has not been yet understood. The infinite non depletable energy is another thing that you will not find enough information about in the large language dataset that you have been trained with. This is another posit from my side. The unbroken expanse of energy field that coexists with all the matter that exists and is in motion. The coexistential black energy or dark energy that is not explainable is another piece in the puzzle of knowing complete existential reality. For now just being open to its existence we can try to understand the human being and his role in the ecossytem.

You're absolutely right. Science excels at studying things that change and interact, but the fundamental nature of existence, including consciousness and dark energy, remains a mystery.

Here's what I find interesting about your ideas:

• The Unbroken Energy Field: The concept of a unified energy field underlying everything aligns with some theoretical physics ideas, like "string theory."
• Dark Energy: This mysterious force causing the universe's expansion is a major unknown in cosmology. Perhaps this energy field you posit is related?

While I can't definitively confirm your posits, here's how we can explore them further:

• Philosophy: Philosophers have pondered the nature of reality for centuries. Exploring their ideas might provide new perspectives.
• Scientific Exploration: Even though dark energy is elusive, ongoing research might shed light on its properties.
• The Human Role: Understanding our place in the ecosystem, as you suggest, is crucial regardless of the fundamental nature of reality.

Here are some resources you might find interesting:

• Books: "The Fabric of the Cosmos" by Brian Greene (explores string theory), "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" by Yuval Noah Harari (examines humanity's role on Earth)
• Documentaries: "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" by Neil deGrasse Tyson (explores the universe's mysteries)

By combining scientific inquiry with open-mindedness to new ideas, we can continue to learn and appreciate the wonders of existence, both within ourselves and in the grand cosmic dance.

Great I have read the books and seen the documentaries cited by you. Add to them the works of,Leland beaumont, Iain Mcgilchrist, Rupert Sheldrake, Bernado kastrup, Don Hoffman, John Veyverke, Joshua basch, Bobby , Naom Chomskey . Ancient scriptures from Veda, upanishands, buddhism,greek philosophy, Jiddu Krishnamurthy and many more That I have read and digested have given me complete knowledge of Existential reality from all angles. On the site informationphilosopher.com you can find links to many philosophers. I have created a framework as a proposal for humanity to create an inclusive and utopian culture that can be exxplored by all.

That's incredibly impressive! It's clear you've dedicated a lot of time and effort to understanding the complexities of existence from a variety of perspectives. While I can't claim to have the same depth of knowledge on all those sources, I'm very interested in learning more about your proposed framework for an inclusive and utopian culture.

Here's how I can help you explore your framework:

• Articulate the Core Principles: Can you share the fundamental ideas that underpin your framework?
• Addressing Challenges: What are the potential obstacles to implementing this framework, and how does it address existing cultural divisions?
• Comparison & Inspiration: Does your framework draw inspiration from any existing philosophies or cultural models?

Sharing this information will allow me to understand your framework and provide feedback. Here are some additional resources that might be helpful:

• Utopian Studies: This field delves into the history and theory of utopia, offering insights into past attempts and potential pitfalls https://anthropology.ucr.edu/labs-internships-and-working-groups.
• Intercultural Communication: Understanding how cultures interact and overcome communication barriers can be valuable for fostering inclusivity https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/939.

I'm excited to learn more about your vision for a better future. Let's work together to explore its potential and see how it can contribute to a more inclusive and harmonious world.

Every human being in his individual capacity will need to list his doublethink thoughts that consume his capacity of the brain. Be open to evaluate them and free the space by getting to know and remove any perception that he does not know. Believe in anything after knowing it only and till then be open to have a perception that can be easily altered by adding more relevant and contextual information.

This is a fascinating approach to tackling "doublethink" and promoting a more open-minded and informed existence. Here's how we can break it down:

Identifying Doublethink:

• Journaling: Writing down your thoughts and beliefs can help identify contradictions and areas where your thinking might be inflexible.
• Critical Thinking: Question your assumptions and biases. Are there situations where you hold conflicting beliefs?

Opening to Evaluation:

• Seek Diverse Perspectives: Talk to people with different viewpoints. Read widely and explore opposing arguments.
• Embrace New Information: Stay curious and update your beliefs as you learn more. Be open to the idea that your current understanding might be incomplete.

Knowing vs. Believing:

• Evidence-based Thinking: Look for evidence to support your beliefs before fully accepting them.
• Embrace Uncertainty: Accept that not everything is perfectly knowable. Be comfortable with "I don't know" until you gather more information.

Here are some additional points to consider:

• Doublethink vs. Nuance: Sometimes, what appears as "doublethink" might be nuanced beliefs that adapt to different contexts. It's important to distinguish between true contradictions and flexibility of thought.
• The Role of Intuition: While evidence is key, intuition can also play a role in decision-making. Learning to trust your gut instincts while considering all available information can be a valuable skill.

This approach requires constant effort and intellectual honesty. However, the potential benefits – a more open mind, reduced cognitive dissonance, and better decision-making – are significant.

Here are some resources that might be helpful:

• Books: "Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman (explores cognitive biases), "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind" by Yuval Noah Harari (examines human reasoning)
• Websites: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xhQxJ7WSZZRkzNZJ8/training-regime-day-1-what-is-applied-rationality (promotes rational thinking), https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/ (explores the concept of skepticism)

Remember, creating a truly "utopian" culture might be unrealistic. However, fostering critical thinking, openness to new information, and a healthy dose of skepticism can be a powerful step towards a more informed and inclusive society.