Portfolio Efficiency

Portfolio Efficiency

If you were to design a system to pump water up a hill, would you account for the efficiency of the pump in your design?

Of course you would!

You want to know that you are producing the flow you need while using the least amount of power.

The design of your investment portfolio should not be any different. You should want to get the most output per unit of input.

In the case of investing, the input is volatility risk and the output is the risk premium you expect to earn by taking on risk.

If you aren’t willing to take any risk, you could just own cash. If you want to attempt to earn a risk premium or “excess return” above the rate of cash, you need to be willing to take “excess risk” above the rate of cash.

The amount of excess return you achieve per excess risk taken is called the Sharpe ratio.

Sharpe Ratio = Excess Return / Excess Risk

The Sharpe ratio is one of the primary metrics used to measure efficiency of investment return. In the same way that you want to choose an efficient pump, you should want to build a portfolio that has a high Sharpe ratio.

If you look at the title image (also below), you will notice a solid line drawn between the “cash” and “portfolio” dots. The slope of this line is the Sharpe ratio of the portfolio.

To take this a step further, consider your favorite formula from algebra:

y = m*x + b

If we convert this formula for our purposes, we get:

Portfolio Return = Sharpe Ratio * Excess Risk + Return of Cash

Think of this as the equation that represents the performance of your financial pump.

The portfolio return is like your desired output or flow rate.

The Sharpe ratio is like your pump efficiency.

The excess risk is like your energy input.

Here are a few takeaways about the equation:

  1. We can't control the rate of cash. It's effectively just a constant in this equation.
  2. We have some control over the Sharpe ratio. The best we can do is diversify our assets as much as possible and hope for the best. Just keep in mind that there is no guarantee that diversification will lead to a more efficient portfolio.
  3. The main variable that is within our control is the amount of risk we take. If we have a longer time horizon, we can afford to take more risk in hopes of harvesting more risk premium.

I'll leave it there for now. Short and sweet. In the next edition, we will break down the Sharpe ratio equation a bit further to see how diversification can potentially have a positive effect on efficiency.

Tyler Wiggins

Former Engineering Manager turned Territory Sales Manager || I help EPCs and Electrical Contractors with connection, grounding, and wire management solutions. || BURNDY || CONNECT and let’s chat!

11 个月

Algebra nearly killed me in middle school. Once I got the hang of it I loved math more, funny enough. I really like point three: "If we have a longer time horizon, we can afford to take more risk in hopes of harvesting more risk premium." Helps enforce the idea of investing early when possible, right?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Andy Cole, PE的更多文章

  • The Bond Volatility Paradox

    The Bond Volatility Paradox

    I’ve got an investing paradox to share with you. It involves one of my favorite diversifiers, extended duration…

  • Risk Capacity as a Function of Time

    Risk Capacity as a Function of Time

    When it comes to determining how much risk to take in an investment portfolio, it depends on two factors: 1. Risk…

    2 条评论
  • Why Volatility Matters

    Why Volatility Matters

    How should you invest if you want to improve the odds of meeting your financial goals? In the previous article (link to…

    4 条评论
  • SHARPEning Your Portfolio

    SHARPEning Your Portfolio

    In the last article, we reviewed how the equation of a line that we learned in algebra can also be an expression of the…

    4 条评论
  • Economic Growth, Inflation, and The Fed

    Economic Growth, Inflation, and The Fed

    In last week's article I established that the Federal Reserve (Fed) serves as the “equal and opposite reaction” in the…

    1 条评论
  • Newton's Third Law (of Finance)

    Newton's Third Law (of Finance)

    Today we are going to look at Newton’s third law of finance. To this point, we have established: First Law - Assets…

    5 条评论
  • "Balanced" Portfolios

    "Balanced" Portfolios

    Are the forces in your portfolio balanced? As I have laid out in the last few articles, the primary forces that act on…

    6 条评论
  • Portfolio Forces

    Portfolio Forces

    What if you could earn similar returns to the stock market without taking any risk? Would you invest in something like…

    4 条评论
  • Financial Force Direction

    Financial Force Direction

    Force vectors are made up of two components: Magnitude Direction In the previous article, we looked at an approach for…

    4 条评论
  • Newton's Second Law (of Finance)

    Newton's Second Law (of Finance)

    F = M*A This equation sums up Newton’s second law and is also the mathematical basis for a lot of engineering design…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了