Population Health in the Time of Genomics
What, exactly, is “population health?” It's one of those buzz phrases that no one really knows how to define. Is it the population of our patients? Is it the population that surrounds us? Who's the population and how do you define health?
For me, population health is taking better care of our patients. But it also means anticipating their medical needs when we can.
Let me tell you how population health is playing out for us at Geisinger.
We're one of the only organizations taking a population-approach to genomics with our MyCode Community Health Initiative. Right now there are definitely some great cancer treatment centers looking at the sub-type of your oncogene and determining medication based on what type of cancer you have. There are definitely tests out there that can look at your genetic profile and determine what medication you should be put on or should be avoided: pharmacogenetics.
Our approach is population genetics. What we're doing – and saying to our friends and neighbors who are our patients – is, 'Would you allow us to look at your whole genome?' With a 90 percent positive response rate, we’ve already exceeded our 120,000th full genome and we think we'll hit 250,000 pretty soon.
So we have this genetic information, along with clinical information, along with 20 years’ worth of electronic health records data for four generations of families. And we're returning results to our patients – what is now called precision medicine. But I would say precision medicine is taking care of someone who is already sick. To me, what we’re doing is really anticipatory medicine. It's coming up with medically actionable conditions and giving that information back to our patients.
And no one else is doing that.
So maybe we find that you have Lynch Syndrome, which is associated with significantly higher rates of colon cancer. Or maybe it’s familial hypercholesterolemia, the kind of cholesterol problem that means you should be on medication for stroke or heart disease – at age 8. Or you're BRCA positive and you and your family need to make some decisions about what to do right now.
Let me tell you about one of our patients. She’s 55 years-old and she and her husband take care of their three grandkids. She came back positive for the BRCA gene with no family history of breast cancer. So typically, she wouldn’t have had this type of testing done. She sat down with our genetic counselors and told them, ‘I need to live ten more years because I’m caring for my grandchildren.’ After she opted for preventive surgery, a stage 1 cancer was found in her fallopian tubes which never would have happened without MyCode.
To me, that is population health. We're going to prevent heart disease. I think we can say today that if you're a young woman in central or northeast Pennsylvania, your chances of getting breast cancer are lower than anywhere in the world. Because no one is checking entire populations for BRCA and then acting on it.
Well, almost no one.
Yes, Iceland - which has a similar, stable patient population as ours - is collecting genetic information. But they’re not linked to a health system so they're not getting the feedback to the patients involved.
We are. And by doing so it allows us to treat our patients before they get sick and helps prevent life-threatening diseases before they take hold. It’s changing the course of their lives.
To me, that's population health – anticipatory medicine for our patients.
Strategic Planning, Business Development, and Population Health Professional
8 年From the perspective of a (future) healthcare administrator, I think what struck me the most in this article is that Geisinger's innovation isn't necessarily the technology being used to look at genetics and determine best treatments, but a system that supports the continuous feedback of information back to patients, allowing for actual improvement in health to occur. Hopefully one day soon, health systems that support this degree of patient-provider interaction won't be seen as "innovative," but as inherent. Until then, we can look to Geisinger to lead the way!
Senior Consultant | GenAI Strategist | Capgemini Invent
8 年Whoa, this awesome! What kind of statistical models are you using to make these predictions? Also, with what kind of frequency does the algorithm get updated in terms of new discoveries? Over all, this is incredible, and it needs to be deployed across all health systems! Way to have such an amazing vision!
Market Access | Account Management | Launch Excellence | KOL Development | Business Acumen | Biologics | Rare Disease
8 年Extremely interesting information.
Medical Doctor and Professional Homeopath at Sajjad Hospital
8 年Dear Mr.David Feinberg Hi. Thank you so much for your informative article on population health and population genetics. Assessment of population genome is a revolutionary act to have deeper understanding of everyone genes, healthy or defected. Certainly preventing heart diseases and cancer and other major conditions is of great importance to population general health. To us, homeopaths, health is much deeper than it may be thought of. Physical health means to be free of all pains. Emotional and psychiatric health is maintained when one is free from all passions. And spiritual health is obtained when one is free from selfishness. Homeopathy's goal for complete health looks very hard to reach, but when one aims to reach the pick of a mountain she/he will sure be able to reach at least close to the pick. We together can reach better levels of health using your knowledge of Genomes and Genetics and our knowledge of Homeopathic Medicine. Good Luck
Healthcare's Grey Rhino- Identifying and Mitigating Risks
8 年This adds a whole new dimension to enterprise risk management