The Ponzi Scheme of Ambition

The Ponzi Scheme of Ambition

In the February 7, 2017 CB Insights newsletter, we talked about Uber and coined the term the ponzi scheme of ambition to describe the firm. It led to a lot of impassioned comments back in response.

Now that the ride-hailing giant has gone public 2+ years after that initial newsletter, we wanted to share it again to see what you think.

BTW, our newsletter was 235,000+ when the ponzi scheme of ambition newsletter was issued. Now, it is 571,000+. Sign up here if you don't already get it. It's pretty good.

Now onto what we wrote in Feb 2017.

------------------------

A month ago, I'd wondered if autonomous vehicles were actually going to be a good thing for Uber and many of you responded saying Uber would be the platform and we (autonomous vehicle owners) would rent out our cars during the day to let them drive for Uber.

It was a sci-fi picture of the future that would require autonomous vehicles to be good enough to navigate urban environments and also require us to be willing to rent out our owned autonomous vehicles to Uber when we don't need them. In short, it required a lot of things to go just right for Uber's vision of the future to come true. Let's assume for a second that this all happens. What is the timing on this becoming possible? Next 5 years? Seems unlikely.

But it's certainly a seductive picture of the future.

And then yesterday, there was an article about Uber hiring an ex-NASA engineer to build flying cars.

It reminded me of a conversation I had at The Innovation Summit breakfast for auto ecosystem executives at which I asked if Uber was a ponzi scheme of ambition.

It led to some impassioned opinions. 

Let me explain.

When Uber came out, it was going to disrupt the taxi industry.And then it was taxis, last mile logistics, vehicle ownership and autonomous driving.

And then it was taxis, last mile logistics, vehicle ownership, autonomous driving and trucking (with Otto acquisition).

And then it was taxis, last mile logistics, vehicle ownership, autonomous driving, trucking (with Otto acquisition) and drones.

And now it's all the above + flying cars.

I might have the order wrong but all are forays by Uber into markets that paint a picture of an ever larger total addressable market (TAM). This coupled with Uber's uninhibited ambition gets investors excited.

And they, the investors, keep ponying up cash (see screenshot with financings and accompany valuations below)

No alt text provided for this image

But the reality is that Uber doesn't even dominate the first industry it attacked — taxis. Their playbook didn't work in China. They don't dominate in India and there are well capitalized competitors in southeast Asia, the Middle East, South America, etc.

Yet despite not owning their first market, they continue to paint a picture of their ambition with their efforts in various adjacent areas.

It certainly is an alluring narrative and has aided in the company's rapid ascent and investment treasure chest. But at some point, the performance will have to match the promise. Or at least one would think so.

Or can the narrative of an ever-increasing market opportunity be spun aka the ponzi scheme of ambition to keep Uber's coffers filled and investors happy?

I thought the breakfast led to interesting conversation so wanted to share more widely. Many folks pointed to Amazon as being similar but they are a tough comp and their expansion was often into adjacent areas in the beginning (from books into other retail categories).

Of course, many at the breakfast thought the idea was "misguided" which is a nice way of saying they think I'm stupid. I don't deny that I may be :)

For more interesting and sometimes contrarian thoughts on tech, competition and markets, join 571,000+ others and get the CB Insights newsletter.

Bruce Dowding

Mining Metals Enterprise Strategic Accounts

5 å¹´

Anand it takes courage to tell it how it is; I align and agree with that metric; many dont! or even understand what a south -sea bubble - Ponzi is. Because they creep up on us when we least expect it. As one looks around current IT/tech/Software/Service landscape we see 20 years of internet. We see lots of 2/3/4 Gen-{hype-spin-fluff} out there. Sifting through the GUNK is a challenge. Discrete Q2 - 2018-19Q4 down turn in capital investment/VC funding is the warning shot; some will come through some will vanish. Expensive way to learn. ?

赞
回复
Bruce Dowding

Mining Metals Enterprise Strategic Accounts

5 å¹´

Really great insight well done

??????????? Danny Zaitsev

Power markets | Battery storage | Virtual power plants | EVs

5 å¹´

It’s kind of funny how often companies (especially industry incumbents in search of “the New”) define their vision/mission as “the Uber of _________”. I think most of them don’t subscribe to your newsletter.

Anton Koval

Precomposable is the new composable

5 å¹´

I would say the approach of Amazon and Uber to competitions is similar. With the supply of infinite/very cheap cash they were able to undercut the competition in terms of pricing. However, Amazon has also built operational excellence that helped it to be profitable with low prices, while Uber just made a price war with the hope that somehow costs will go down. Amazon has AWS that can easily offset the losses in other businesses. If Uber was selling, for instance, its routing engine to other industries they might have built something similar to AWS that would help them be profitable.?

赞
回复
Al Celeby

I thrive while Prospecting, Solution Selling and Creating High Performing Sales Teams

5 å¹´

That is the case with most start-ups. From a round to a round backing up branded college degrees and people with little or none management experience.

赞
回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Anand Sanwal的更多文章

  • Neuralink and mind reading tech

    Neuralink and mind reading tech

    Mind reading tech is coming A bit on Neuralink, brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and mind reading tech First, let's talk…

    3 条评论
  • Carta's secondary market ambitions cause Twitter drama. But does it matter?

    Carta's secondary market ambitions cause Twitter drama. But does it matter?

    Alright, for those of you who are not chronically online, you probably missed that equity cap table management startup…

    14 条评论
  • Data suggests Byju's valuation is $20 billion lower (an 80-90% cut)

    Data suggests Byju's valuation is $20 billion lower (an 80-90% cut)

    Once valued at $22 billion, BYJU'S, the India-based ed tech unicorn, is now likely worth less than the total equity…

    11 条评论
  • The 1st billionaire YouTuber is going after Coca-Cola and Pepsi

    The 1st billionaire YouTuber is going after Coca-Cola and Pepsi

    Variety just revealed that MrBeast pulled in $82 million in revenue in the last year. And so many think he will be the…

    22 条评论
  • Digital pill mill?

    Digital pill mill?

    Saw this ad today while doing some research on the mental health space. I appreciate the honesty of this 'mental…

    6 条评论
  • 18 guaranteed ways to ruin your startup's 2022

    18 guaranteed ways to ruin your startup's 2022

    Your startup has more than 5 people Want to leave 2022 weaker than you started? Follow these tips 1/ Keep the…

    11 条评论
  • A bunch of startup ideas I like

    A bunch of startup ideas I like

    So this started with 3 startup ideas but given the response in the newsletter, I decided to keep adding to them here…

    17 条评论
  • Data residency-as-a-service is HOT

    Data residency-as-a-service is HOT

    Note: this is a bit of an experiment to share technology market trends we're observing on CB Insights. This might be…

  • Using fake startup valuations to lure talent

    Using fake startup valuations to lure talent

    On the 31% of unicorns that are worth exactly $1B, partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners Jeremy Liew wryly noted (via…

    23 条评论
  • The Awkward, Sometimes Difficult Teenage Years

    The Awkward, Sometimes Difficult Teenage Years

    In 2014, CB Insights was 30 people. We are now ~250.

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了