For polymaths, career paths may look more like tendrils
Magnus Hedemark
Fractional CxO / SVP Engineering | #neurodiverseSquad #ActuallyAutistic #ADHD
"So, Magnus, when did you decide you want to focus your career on being a DevOps Coaching Manager?"
I haven't been asked this exact question yet, but I get something like it every time I go through a job interview process. The interviewer seems to be feeling around for some pediatric-rooted need in my bones to fill the particular role that I'm interviewing for. Since I'm a DevOps Coaching Manager today, I imagine that's the question I'll get asked in some upcoming tomorrow.
But my career has never really played out like that. I'm a polymath, which in plain English means I know stuff about things. Lots of different things. I suppose some people would say I've got comb-shaped skills, but they go off in all kinds of crazy directions.
For example, I've worked in fields ranging from photographer to writer, editor, copy editor, night club bouncer, tire specialist (that's a thing), to being a member of a Visual FX crew for a Hollywood film (which went straight to video, but still...). I had my New Jersey fishing boat captain's license before I was old enough to drive a car in my home state of Pennsylvania. My hobbies have hobbies, and my career path has sort of followed a twisting, branching path to reflect that.
Living outside of the box (or inside of many boxes) makes it a lot easier to think outside of the proverbial box. Sometimes I approach engineering leadership problems with the same mindset that I'd approach an art project, or how I might contend with a 6'6" 275 pound linebacker who had a few too many drinks in my bar (read: carefully).
I'd worked in computers in some fashion or another for years before taking on my first full time gig, which was initially supposed to be about testing video games, but that same day my role became more about testing enterprise operating systems. The wind changed direction, and so did I. I spent a lot of time as a systems administrator, sometimes as a manager. After having some great leadership mentors enter my life, I entered a leadership role with real intent and found that I enjoyed the challenges far more than I ever enjoyed engineering.
But being limited to just one role was never enough. I'd work by day at IBM as an engineer while keeping the peace at a downtown Raleigh night club as a bouncer at night. The money didn't matter, but the life experience I gained there was fantastic. I still think I'm a better manager today because of some of the skills I learned as a bouncer (which is a lot more about things like making quick risk assessments, negotiating good outcomes from a position of having less power or influence than the other person, and talking people down from doing something they might regret).
Some fork in the road took me toward managing a Continuous Delivery team, and then another fork took me to DevOps Coaching. Now I'd kind of informally done a good bit of DevOps and Agile coaching before this, but really this is another new role for me.
And next year, maybe it'll be something else. Travel writer? As if the world needs any more of those. But I won't rule it out.
So when did I decide I wanted to be a DevOps coaching manager? Honestly, I never did. My organization had a need, and I didn't flinch when my leaders looked at me to take it on. But as a polymath, I like to half-kid that I never did decide what I want to be when I grow up, and I hope that I never do.
Polymaths are a different sort of beast. We don't take on roles because they are easy, but because they are not easy. It's the new experience, the greater challenge to rise to, that lets us be explorers within ourselves. To find my own borders (and then expand them) is far more compelling than never leaving the house that I grew up in.
Of course, I can only speak for myself. Other polymaths have taken their own paths, have their own values. Maybe some will tell you a bit of their stories here in the comments.
Cloud and DevOps Professional | AWS Solutions Architect | Terraform and Container Expert
8 年Great article and writing ! My career spans 4 vastly different industries where I used very different skill sets. I started off as a manufacturing engineer focusing on lean manufacturing, which fit in well with my college degree as an industrial engineer. During that time as a side project I was given the opportunity to work on a PLC project. The project got me interested in home automation and eventually let me to become and industrial automation engineer. I worked on the pipeline flow side, later moving into the well head automation side. When working out in the oil field I got to work with some managers who dealt with the business side of the company as well as the technical side; I wanted to get more involved with the business side, and was very sick of traveling. Enter Nate the Business Proccess Consultant. I enjoyed the job, i got to utilize two of my passions data analysis and visualization quite heavily. I was forced to look for other opportunities when my segment was on the chopping block. I was able to join the agile -DevOps group (neither of which I had direct experience in prior) but my skills from non directly related jobs were very relevant. I enjoy learning so the transition was fun, but I still have so much to learn about DevOps, agile and the healthcare business.
Continuous Learner
8 年Throughout my life I have focused on the concept of continual growth. In "Kosmic Consciousness", Ken Wilber talks about The Big Three: The Beautiful (Art/subjective truth/I), The True (Science/objective truth/it), and The Good (Morals/intersubjective truth/we). He argues that often people focus on growth in one area, at the detriment of the others. I try to keep this in mind, and look at my personal and professional development in holistic terms. I believe the cornerstone of intelligence is creativity. It's the ability to take something you've learned in one discipline, and apply it in another setting or context. There are many smart individuals (i.e., those who are "book smart"), but not too many intelligent ones. It's like someone who can sing really well, but only if the song has been prerecorded by another artist. If you give them an original song, they don't know where to begin. They lack the ability to extrapolate and apply the knowledge they have. They're unable to take the creative leaps that are necessary. For me, complacency and stagnation are a death knell. I am energized most when learning something new.