Political Prisoner Julian Paul Assange Release Request 14
Pidancet Barrière Véronique
Auteur scénariste Journaliste Réalisateur Metteur en scène
Paris, Tuesday 5 January 2020
Release Request 14
Prisoner of opinion : Julian Paul Assange (03/07/1971)
Aka Julian Paul Hawkins, aka Mendax
Prison : Belmarsh
Prisoner Number: A 93 79 AY
Subject: Request for information on mandate representation in the case EAW 131226-10 European Arrest Warrant File No. AM 131226-10 :
File No. RCJ CO/1925/2011
Since November 2019, as the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange's lawyers have failed to get satisfaction, the WJJA human rights association has already filed thirteen release requests concerning the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.
We kindly ask you for the fourteenth time to release the political prisoner, the war prisoner, known as Julian Paul Assange.
Nothing now stands in the way of this release since the citizen known as (Vanessa) Baraitser, representative of the private entities holding the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange hostage, has pronounced the "discharge" in the context of the extradition procedure requested by the non-sovereign American state of Virginia, also called Commonwealth of Virginia, to the private entity City of London managed by the Crown of England.
410. I order the discharge of Julian Paul Assange, pursuant to section 91(3) of the EA 2003. (US v Assange / Judgement 04121)
The extradition treaty does not provide for an appeal, moreover there is no appeal since it is not a verdict but a refusal of extradition pronounced by a sovereign State. Moreover, as we proved in our international complaint, other elements of law have been violated in this case: the local court of the Commonwealth of Virginia cannot claim to prosecute Julian Assange since he is not a sovereign state, subject to international law and has not signed a diplomatic extradition treaty with Great Britain. Even if this court makes a second extradition request, it will not be an appeal from the first, but a new request.
We proved that this extradition procedure between two private entities was illegal. We proved that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange was incarcerated incommunicado and illegally tortured by these private entities. We proved that he should never have been kidnapped and deprived of his liberty. We are collecting more and more testimonials attesting to the fraudulent practices of these private entities. One of our informants told us that citizen Julian Paul Assange should not be tried at the Old Bailey. This court would be supposed to judge terrorists. Many citizens have told us that they feel they are hostages to a corrupt system that they want to see dispensed.
However, the official representative of these private entities, the citizen known as (Vanessa ) Baraitser having pronounced themselves in favour of the "discharge", we take note that these entities have pronounced themselves in favour of an unconditional release as provided for in article 25 of the Extradition Act 2003.
This section applies if at any time in the extradition hearing it appears to the judge that the condition in subsection (2) is satisfied.
(2)The condition is that the physical or mental condition of the person in respect of whom the Part 1 warrant is issued is such that it would be unjust or oppressive to extradite him.
(3)The judge must—
(a)order the person’s discharge, or
(b)adjourn the extradition hearing until it appears to him that the condition in subsection (2) is no longer satisfied.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/41/section/25
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/41/contents
In the light of this article, it is clear that all charges against the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange have been dropped and he is unconditionally free.
Moreover, he should have been released from the Old Bailey at the end of the hearing on 4 January 2020, after the private entities holding him hostage handed over his identity papers. This is a new violation of the laws committed by the citizen known as (Vanessa) Baraitser, official representative of the private entities holding the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange hostage.
We recall that the citizen known as (Vanessa) Baraitser is incriminated in the complaint we filed with the international judicial authorities (See Complaint).
No bail should be demanded from the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange in exchange for his freedom. In view of his condition as a hostage, this bail would be similar to a ransom.
We repeat, with regard to article 25 of the Extradition Act of 2003, the citizen known under the name of Julian Paul Assange is unconditionally free. Since he has been "discharged", he is no longer the subject of any proceedings. He is free to choose his place of residence. He is free to choose his host country. He is free to travel wherever he wants, all the more so as he is in possession of an Australian passport which allows him to travel without a visa within the EU, to be treated as he wishes and by whomever he wants.
The citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is now a free citizen.
We therefore call upon the sovereign government of the UK, the sovereign government of the USA and the governments of other sovereign countries to demand from the private entities holding him hostage an immediate release at the end of the hearing on January 6, 2020.
In our Complaint 1, we proved that the identity of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange was a pseudonym and that his Australian birth certificate was not legally valid.
We therefore call upon the justice of the sovereign government of the UK and other sovereign governments to ensure that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange can publicly declare his birth identity and officially present himself to the citizens of the world.
We recall that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange bears distinctive signs allowing him to be easily identified.
If the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange did not have an identity because he was the victim of a paedocriminal network, we ask the sovereign government of the UK or other sovereign countries to allow him to acquire one and to give him a nationality (See complaint and all release requests).
In the eyes of the law, the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is free. He can settle in any country and apply for a residence permit.
We once again call for his immediate release.
If the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange wishes to settle in France, the WJJA delegate present in London can take care of him, help him prepare his departure and escort him there.
A house awaits him there to allow him to restart his life and a team of doctors. We will provide the address of this accommodation to the sovereign authorities of the UK if necessary.
We call on the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and the sovereign governments of the other countries to implement the 2016 UN decision and they demand that the private entities that illegally imprisoned and tortured the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange compensate him in proportion to the suffering he endured and the after-effects they may have caused.
The Human Rights Defense Association WJJA opposes any internment of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who assessed the mental health of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange have proven links with the private entities run by the English crown who are holding him hostage. Their reports cannot be considered objective, either from a medical or judicial point of view.
We recall that psychologists and doctors are involved in the MKultra and torture programs of the CIA and many other countries. We recall that Dr. William Sargant, involved in the MKultra, worked at the Saint Thomas Hospital in London (See release Request and Complaint 1)
CIA Torture Psychologists Settle Lawsuit [1]
https://www.aclu.org/print/node/65103
Since September 2019, WJJA delegates and physicians have attended all hearings and observed with great attention the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. They found that he showed signs of torture, intense physical suffering due to his torture, and he' was fear of the guards, but they found no signs of autistic, asperger-like, or depressive behavior. He always showed himself to be calm, fighting, able to write, including long arguments, during the hearings, for communicate with his lawyers.
We recall…
Informed consent is the process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention. The patient must be competent to make a voluntary decision about whether to undergo the procedure or intervention. Informed consent is both an ethical and legal obligation of medical practitioners in the US and originates from the patient's right to direct what happens to their body. Implicit in providing informed consent is an assessment of the patient's understanding, rendering an actual recommendation, and documentation of the process. The Joint Commission requires documentation of all the elements of informed consent "in a form, progress notes or elsewhere in the record." The following are the required elements for documentation of the informed consent discussion: (1) the nature of the procedure, (2) the risks and benefits and the procedure, (3) reasonable alternatives, (4) risks and benefits of alternatives, and (5) assessment of the patient's understanding of elements 1 through 4.
It is the obligation of the provider to make it clear that the patient is participating in the decision-making process and avoid making the patient feel forced to agree to with the provider. The provider must make a recommendation and provide their reasoning for said recommendation.[1][2][3]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430827/
As long as the citizen known as Julian Assange is in the hands of the private entities holding him hostage, he will be subject to pressure and will not be able to make his decisions freely.
None of the medical conclusions produced in this deliberation have any legal value. Medical expertises must be carried out by independent experts with no connection to any of the parties involved in the expertise.They are null and void.
Furthermore, we draw the attention of the judicial bodies of the sovereign government of the UK and the sovereign governments of the world to the fact that the citizen known as Stella Morriz, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson has no legitimacy to make decisions regarding the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.
Indeed, the identity of Stella Morriz, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson is a pseudonym. She is now the subject of a complaint requesting that her birth identity and the birth identities of the children of whom she claims to be the mother be established. Until the birth identity of Stella Morriz, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson has been established by court order, she has no official identity. She can therefore neither practice a profession, especially not that of lawyer, nor buy an apartment, nor get a driving license. She can even less intervene in the life of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.
We have also proven that she has ties to Stephen Saideman and through him to the CFR. She is therefore connected to those who are persecuting the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.
About Stella Morris, Stephen Saideman, Robert James Woolsey, Carlyle Group and Booz Hamilton
https://youtu.be/qMSTCNDaiXI
We therefore request the judicial authorities of the sovereign government of the UK and the governments of other sovereign countries to ensure that the birth identity of Stella Morriz, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Smith Robertson is established as well as those of the two little boys she presents as her own and those of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.
We therefore request the judicial authorities of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and of the governments of other sovereign countries to establish under which surname these two little boys are registered in the English birth registers, knowing that neither the presumed father nor the presumed mother has a birthday name.
The stake is also the lives of these children. As a human rights organization we are also attentive to the rights of ALL children and we want to be certain that in this case there is no abuse being committed against these children. The simple fact of exposing their faces in the press already appears to us as an abuse.
A complaint has been lodged with the different judicial authorities of sovereign countries o determine which private entities incarcerated incommunicado and tortured the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.
This complaint has been issued to most judicial institutions and governments of sovereign states: Tanzania, Mali, Tunisia, Russia, USA, Belarus, UK, Germany, China, Vietnam, Iran, etc.
Copies were sent to many parliamentarians and the media.
It is in open source.
We urge you to share this complaint massively so that as many citizens as possible are informed.
This complaint was registered with? United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in the United States and an investigation has been opened. The persons, institutions, media, NGOs incriminated, as well as the UN and the WHO are now under initial investigation scrutiny for crimes against humanity, misappropriation of public property, forgery and falsification, usurpation of identity and function, torture and many other crimes.
Furthermore, the fragility of the United States of America Constitution, which do not manage to activate the Supreme Court to judge upon highly suspected electoral fraud at a massive level, is reflecting the disrespect of their own constitution by democratic governments and institutions, as is the case in France through the mandate of President Macron. The unprecedented violations of international laws and treaties reported in our complaint creates a global geopolitical imbalance that can degenerate into bloody wars between over-armed nations and people, in a context of fundamental human rights and related laws denial.
We therefore thank USAID and urge other sovereign countries to register this complaint and to initiate investigations. Indeed, it is imperative that police and judicial coalition be put in place at the international level to tackle the dereliction and/or corruption that is rampant in many institutions such as the UN and WHO, the British Crown, many entities and in many multinational companies. No country can beat corruption alone on its own territory because, as the here attached two years long investigation report shows, too many institutions are corrupt and too many citizens have been or are being blackmailed.
We are calling for inter-state legal-police collaboration, as was the case from a military point of view during the wars, in order to put an end to the actions of this extra-judicial and extra-territorial "governmental structure" that transgresses the laws in order to establish its territorial and economic supremacy to the detriment of civilian populations and democracies.
We call on the victims of this extra-judicial and extra-territorial structure and on all witnesses of their crimes, regardless of their country of origin or social status, who wish to make their voices heard to contact our association by email ([email protected]) so that we can add them to this complaint, so that justice be done for them and for us all.
Summary of the complaint
An extra-constitutionnel and extra-territorial state, the citizen known as Stella Morris, aka Stella or Sara Gonzalez Devant, aka Stella Morris Robertson, aka?, the management and staff of Belmarsh Prison, the Management and Staff of SERCO, The citizen known as Judge Baraitser, named by the media Vanessa Baraitser, Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and the management and staff of US Government, The management and staff of US Democrats in link with Assange case and all offenses in link with the Assange case, Andy Müller Maguhn, Klaus Schleisieck, Bernd Fix, Jens Ohlig, Winfried Motzkus and Wau Holland Stiftung, Angela Merkel and the management and staff of German government, The management and staff of the of The Chase Manhattan Bank, Lloyds Bank, Commerzbank Kassel, The management and staff of Imperial college of London Saint Marys’ Hospital, The Crown of England, The management and staff of UN for violation of fundamental human rights and UN Charter in connection with the management of the Pact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, and some others...
This complaint is the result of a year and a half of investigation.
This investigation has brought to light an extra-constitutional and extra-territorial “State“ (see complaint). This State is also denounced in a complaint by the government of the United States of America, District of Columbia : Criminal Action No. 20-165-JEB / United States of America v. KEVIN CLINESMITH. It produces the testimony of Christopher Earl Strunk. Like the sovereign government of the United States of America, we suspect this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial State of circumventing international laws and violating fundamental human rights by using private entities, tax and legal havens under feudal law and the Navigation Act of 1660.
This investigation account of worrying lies, embezzlement and collusion at the international level between different entities, elements, agencies, of a private nature, between members of certain political parties and employees of certain States institutions. These entities seem to have devised a whole series of schemes to evade the official channels of justice, in particular by conducting mock trials such as that of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange on private territories that are akin to tax and legal havens. We have isolated two such territories: the City of London and the Kingdom of Hanover.
Other legal problems arise on the dominions, property of the Crown of England and on the State of Virginia in the United States.
This problem of international law can seriously harm the geo-political balance of the planet, all regions combined.
This investigation revealed that the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange is incarcerated incommunicado and tortured on English soil by private entities presumably in connection with an extra-constitutional and extra-territorial State, itself linked to the Crown of England via the City of London.
We recall that ? demos ? means people in greek language, and ? kratie ? means power. Democracy is consequently the power of the people by the people for the people.
In a democracy, politicians, magistrates, police officers, military personnel and civil servants are only the representatives of a sovereign people, the servants of a sovereign State, themselves at the service of its citizens. It is the sovereign people who give them orders. It is to the sovereign people that they are accountable to, when they fail in their mission or are liable to acts of misprision, dereliction of duty, abuse of power, treason.
As a result, we are filing a complaint to put an end to the illegal actions of this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state and the private entities with which it is linked, in order to protect the citizens of the world who are its victims.
In the name of citizens of the world, united as sovereign peoples, we ask the judiciaries of sovereign countries, which are the guarantors of their fundamental rights and entitlements, to work together to put an end to the actions of this illegal extra-constitutional and extra-territorial power and to disaggregate the illegal private entities that are at its service.
In the name of citizens of the world, we ask the judicial authorities of sovereign countries, who are the guarantors of their fundamental rights and entitlements, to kindly join their forces to stop, as soon as possible, the trafficking in human beings to which this illegal extra-constitutional and extra-territorial power seems to be involved in deeply.
Military, police, magistrates, lawyers, you are at the service of the sovereign people, at the service of your respective nations. The citizens, sovereign people of all countries, call upon you to act. Take action. Protect them. Please put an end to this illegal extra-constitutional and extra-territorial State.
Preamble to the complaint
Complaint by citizens of the world to demand the immediate and unconditional release, protection and compensation of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange, a citizen clearly identifiable by several distinctive signs. The citizen who embodies Julian Paul Assange concept is both a prisoner of war and a hostage of this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial government. He is also a witness for the prosecution in cases of human trafficking and paedocriminal networks. He is therefore in great danger because he is in the hands of those whose crimes he has denounced. He is imprisoned incommunicado, tortured and he was himself a victim of these networks which can only exist thanks to the extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state against which this complaint is made.
We call upon the sovereign State of USA, the sovereign state of UK and all sovereign states to denounce the illegality of the mock trial of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange. This trial is not based on any legal charge and doesn't respect amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America.
We call upon the sovereign State of USA, the sovereign state of UK and all sovereign states to do everything possible to free him and allow him to testify publicly, through the media, against this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state under his birthday name how all citizen must do it. To date, he is the only living witness in a position to testify against this extra-constitutional and extra-territorial state, as well as against the paedocriminal and human trafficking.
On his freedom and testimony depend the freedom of all citizens and the sovereignty of all states.
On Line
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_eXstiw1_xyvDShkXxCiPYTkaR3WEnpd/view?usp=sharing
In light of all these elements, we urge the judicial bodies of the sovereign government of the UK and the sovereign countries of the world to demand the immediate and unconditional release of the citizen known as Julian Paul Assange.
We ask the judicial authorities of the sovereign government of the United Kingdom and sovereign countries of the world to provide him with all necessary assistance to return to normal life, to allow him to settle in the country of his choice, and to ensure his protection, if necessary.
We call on the judicial authorities of the sovereign government of the UK and sovereign countries of the world to open investigations in order to bring to justice those who illegally incarcerated him incommunicado, used him as a hostage and tortured him and to ensure that he is compensated for the suffering he has endured.
For WikiJustice Julian Assange
Véronique Pidancet Barrière
President