The Political Leadership Narrative; Or, “Don’t Worry, This Won’t Hurt a Bit.”

Let us begin with a metaphor. We can go to our respective App Store and download one of many apps called something like, "7 Minute Workout." This workout system takes all of the titular 7 minutes to complete. Twelve 30-second exercises with 10-second intervals. Generally, yes, even the busiest people can spare 7 minutes relative to preserving the vehicle that grants self-existential life (our body). That 7 minutes of work tends to provide a more pleasant existence for 23 hours, 53 minutes. [1, 2] It's not complicated, but we have to just do it.

Over the years, I've told many people that I learned more from watching my father do sit-ups in the morning as a child than I learned from all my scholarly education, as Aesop and Dr. Franklin said, "a good example is the best sermon." [3] I am still in awe remembering my father denying himself fresh-baked bread at an Italian restaurant dinner while on a family vacation, because he happened to be on a diet at the time. No excuses. His professed diet program would be challenged today by pretty much all the experts, yet sublime in simplicity; to wit: "Don't put the food in your mouth." Indeed, this is still my go-to diet program, notwithstanding all my advanced knowledge of metabolic effects, intermittent fasting, ketogenics, diet bars, and the like. My father would also say things like, "There are a lot of excuses from the bed to the gym, but not so many from the bed to the floor," which is where I would find him in the morning doing push-ups, sit-ups, and stretches. Sometimes our big human brains make things complicated in a manner of sophisticated creative avoidance, "I'm a member of a gym, but I didn't have time to get there today."

Even with all the sophisticated advances in gym machine technology, the simple lowly dumbbell still works wonders. "It's heavy, lift it," my father would say. For the elders on LinkedIn who grew up in the era of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jane Fonda, we can remember the, "No pain, no gain," and "Feel the burn" monikers. [3] And we recall Master Bruce Lee's, "Keep what works, discard what doesn't," and I recall my father's universal advice, "Is it working?"

Derivatively, my advice to people trying to improve just about anything, including the physical body is, "Get ready, it is going to hurt" and "If it doesn't hurt, it tends not to be working." I know that there are contrary arguments, but I will suggest that achieving excellence tends to hurt, perhaps by definition. Yes, the virtues of fortitude and temperance (courage and discipline) tend to hurt, again, by definition. [4] As The Arnold said in Pumping Iron, "If you can go through the pain, you might be a champion. But, if you cannot go through the pain, you won't be a champion."

Achieving excellence is formulaically the endurance of pain, one way or the other. We sacrifice to achieve excellence, if not greatness. And what gets you there, keeps you there.

Yes, we may learn to "love the burn," but that is a different issue. Even if it does not hurt in the body, a change in the habit itself tends to be psychological pain to do so, at least until it becomes the integral natural standard. Thusly, the adage: "Positio ballerina non est naturalis, usque ad est." ("The posture of the ballerina is not natural, until it is.") [5]

There are always people who are selling a tool that makes the sacrifice, the pain, the exercise, "easy and fun," and some people buy it. [*1]

The political body is no different; thusly, the entire grand metaphor of Plato's Republic.

Having said that, let us take a few notable examples of old-speak wisdom, and consider if the wisdom "still works" today, and, if not, why not. [6] Let's start with an ancient one, by Seneca the Younger:

Pampered bodies grow sluggish through sloth; and their own weight exhausts them. Is there any hard-working man to whom idleness is not a punishment?? We see athletes, who study their bodily strength, engage in contests with the strongest of men, and insist that those who train them for the arena should put out their whole strength when practicing with them: they endure blows and maltreatment, and, if they cannot find any single person who is their match, they engage with several at once. Without an antagonist, skill fades away. The tender neck chafes at the yoke, and prosperity unbruised cannot endure a single blow. But, for a man who has acquired a skin calloused by suffering; even if he stumbles, he carries the fight, upon his knee.

[7] And we can bring it forward with President Honest Abraham Lincoln:

You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.

[8, 9] We note in Lincoln's statement the word "permanently," which exposes the differential between a courtesy in spotting the bench press for another and doing the bench press for another; that is, astutely perceiving when helping for the moment is too long and thereby is systemically hurting. The crutch is supposed to be temporary. And, let us take President Teddy Roosevelt:

The first requisite of a good citizen in this republic of ours is that he shall be able and willing to pull his own weight.

[10] We can astutely observe that Teddy says that "to pull your own weight" and to be "willing," being "the first requisite of a good citizen," for reasons similar to the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment (right out-of-the-gate mission-critical). Accordingly, we should not find it unusual that Teddy Roosevelt appointed former-soldier and legal genius philosopher, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., to the U.S. Supreme Court, with Holmes opining:

It is now the moment...to recall what our country has done for each of us, and to ask ourselves what we can do for our country in return.

[11] President John F. Kennedy, immortalizing himself expressly and his source Holmes by implication, stated his timeless paraphrasing; to wit:

Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.

[12] We stop here. Let us stop and contemplate a basic tenet of traditional patriotism: Self-Sacrifice. To give to your countrymen, and to try your best not to take from your countrymen. This is fulfillment of social duty.

Like religion, sacrifice is the last full measure of patriotic duty. Not, "What can I get from the common weal?" but rather, "What can I give to the common weal?" That is, "How can I be a profitable servant to my country, such as to my god?" [12.b, 13.1, 13.2]

Now, it might have been glossed over by some readers in a recent post, The Tarpeian Rock; Or, America's Hard Decisions [14] (to which this post might be considered a follow-up); therefore, let us re-state part of the premising quotation again here:

If a Spartan baby was judged to be unfit for its future duty as a soldier...

[*14] "Unfit for duty as a soldier..." That was the standard of the social measure. By self-sacrifice, a soldier fights for the common weal.

Today, we might call it "the atrocity of infanticide," because we do not understand the philosophical meaning of the context, in the larger sense.

We philosophically understand the adult soldier's duty to self-sacrifice for the country, but we have evolved or devolved, as the case may be, to forget everyone else's duty to self-sacrifice, at any and every age. [15] The philosopher is trained never to forget duty owed by everyone. Everyone is everyone. Everyone includes the infant, and the soldier, and the octogenarian, each of whom simply makes the sacrifice differently, by context. Each has a duty to the greater good of the common weal. We critically consider that the only difference is that society decides for the infant. [*2]

The wages of social political existence are paid by contribution to the common weal. It might be otherwise said as, "The right to the benefits of civil society is earned, not gifted."

Now, watch the following closely, because it's not for children:

"Infanticide" has a newer current socio-juristic implication of a selfish, unbalanced, indulgent crime against the common weal, but this is not that case for the Spartans, but exactly its confused and conflated inverse. To the Spartans, the act was reasonably calculated to foster the common weal. That is, the sacrifice of the one, at any age, for the salvation of others for the common weal. In a manner of speaking, the "infant soldier," only different in time and implementation.

Thusly, in the genius warrior legal philosopher, A+ player [*11] Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., we see exactly this philosophic concept, implemented in a different context in the the case of Buck v. Bell [*11]:

It would be strange if [the government] could not call upon those [mentally ill] who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices..."

[*11] We astutely recognize the exact language by Holmes; to wit: "These lesser sacrifices..." Lesser than what? Lesser than whose?

Lesser than a soldier's sacrifice of death, dismemberment, disfiguration, and the risk of harm's way. [*13]

Like the Spartans, warrior philosopher Holmes is saying "it would be strange" if society could not require these painless sterilizations of the mentally ill to serve the common weal, since soldiers (and law enforcement personnel) endure death and painful horrors by self-sacrifice. Thusly, for the philosopher, the duty exists for everyone: infants, children, mentally ill, soldiers, and senior citizens. "When does duty begin? When does duty end?" Duty is the alpha and omega of the good. Duty has no beginning or end. It is integral to the systemic framework.

The specific implementation is not a difference of duty, or a difference in philosophical principle, but only a difference in time and context.

[16, 17, 18] The wisdom of the philosopher holds fast to the principle, and by the pain of courage and discipline, implements what is necessary to achieve the primary objective, enduring the pain. Not everyone can do it, because it hurts too much. Does anyone think the mother of the Spartan infant tossed her little baby aside like a rock? There was a principle and she did what was necessary, enduring the pain of it as must needs be, not against the common good, but for the common good. [18.b, 18.c]

"Omnia cedunt praecipuae utilitati communi." ("All things yield to the primary objective of the common good.")

[*16, *17, *18] And therein lies exactly the current descension of cultural patriotic expectation.

We serve ourselves only through the common weal, as the body feeds the hand. [19, 20, 20.b1, 20.b2, 20.b3]

But let us press it further. If "infanticide" is not enough straight-talk, let us go even further from the realm of the political correctness that stems from the seed of cowardly fear—particularly in a diverse, free and free-thinking society [21]—and consider the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche.

Nietzsche is brutal, but I will suggest in a good way. If "truth is a dish best served cold," then Nietzsche is like chewing on ice. Nietzsche is like jumping in an ice lake after sitting in a warm bath. You know, that sort of thing.

Nietzsche serves us just like the grain of abrasion to the oyster serves the pearl.

Nietzsche serves us, not because we agree or don't agree with him, but rather because Nietzsche abrases us with a counterbalance to a common coddling indoctrinating narrative, particularly regarding the "Christian morality" that permeates many societies, and particularly in the United States of America. [22] Each thesis has its antithesis, each offering a perspective for the critical judgmental choice of the scientist, here political scientists. [23]

Nietzsche brings his critical-thinking to us with no bedside manner whatsoever, and he implies if we need critical-thinking bedside manner in the first place, then we're probably intellectual frauds, human weaklings, and we should probably die for lack of the virtue of fortitude. [24] Nietzsche might say that we've been trained and indoctrinated in Abrahamic religion moral coddling "Jesus-speak" for so long that we've lost the essential human natural perspective.

The United States is primarily of Christian religious faith, with Jesus as deity, and Nietzsche is the guy who said, "god is dead." (It was Karl Marx who said, "Religion is the opium of the masses.") Nietzsche even said, with insult to injury, that Christianity is a "herd" culture. You know, exactly like the sheep suggested by a shepherd. A voluntary submissive "slave" culture. And, moreover, Nietzsche would say if we cannot even critically think about whether he is right, then we are enslaved as illiterates that the master slaveowners tend to require of their slaves (not to read or to think). [24.b]

So let us not dismiss Nietzsche, or Nietzsche's antitheses, or Nietzsche's painful insults to us, all too quickly. For without an antagonist, skill fades away.

Nietzsche is widely recognized as a philosophical genius. An A+ player. And here's the thing about A+ players: A+ players are not always easy to understand without some dedicated reflection.

[*11, *14] A+ players "Think different," said Steve Jobs (noticing that he cleverly intentionally contradicted the established rules of grammar in saying so). [*17] So let us put our religious and correlated political indoctrination aside for a moment, as critical thinkers, and consider Nietzsche's philosophy as an exercise in open-minded critical-thinking, even if the exercise hurts for a while.

Nietzsche said Christianity is a framework of principles that tends to make the human being weak, soft, tolerant, excusive, forgiving (making excuses and forgiving them), coddling all those meek qualities that might be great "for a victim to be saved by a hero" for an after-life, but they are inconsistent with the more essential rules of nature, where the heights to be achieved by humanity are temporally natural. [*13.3, 24.c, 24.d]

Thusly, Nietzsche introduced the concept of the übermensch or "Super Man." This is not a comic book character, but literally, a "Super Man."

A human being who is not concerned with adversity or controversy. A human being who fights for the cause that he, himself, endorses, without requiring permission or forgiveness. Complete unto himself, with self-produced authority and power from within. Like a force of nature, such as Mother Nature and Father Time, neither asking permission nor forgiveness.

[25, 26, 27, 27.b] Now mark Nietzsche's master psychology, abrasive but profound, which I'll paraphrase:

As a child, you ask for your mother's gift of her teat. When your mother is not responsive, you ask for gifts from your god. When your god is not responsive, you ask for your gifts from government. Grow up.

[24.b] In On Empathy: To Give Empathy Is a Blessing; To Need Empathy Is a Curse [28], I paraphrased the concept by channeling Nietzsche as follows:

You whining adult-children, and the new-math socio-psychologists who tell you that it's okay to have riotous tantrums and to make everyone endure you. Like the infant who cries incessantly for the mother's teat, you pray to god with a never-ending give-me, give-me, give-me, and then replace god with government and society. Always looking for a child's allowance. God is dead. You are cursed as a slave of need and the shackles have been with you so long that you now fail to see them. You have the key to arise from the average and the normal, and to achieve the greatness that you have in self. Find your own unique power within and become, the Super Man."

[*28, 29] All of these expressions of truth say essentially the same thing in different ways: the philosopher's stone is to be self-actualized, self-authorized, self-determined, and self-sufficient. Whether it's Aesop, or Plato, or Seneca, or Jesus, or Lincoln, or Roosevelt, or Holmes, or Kennedy, or Nietzsche. Strive and become. Contribute. Don't take, but give. Be profitable. Work and endure. Don't be a slave, and most of all, don't embrace being a slave. [*29] Be grounded, and yet free.

Finally, let us consider the following, by a metaphorical formula of human internal merit multiplied by an external tool in order to equal the intended result. The greater the internal merit in the human, the less an external tool must be relied upon to achieve the intended condition.

But, behold, "if we can buy it, then it ain't us." And, there's always someone selling something, a pain-killer, or an easy way. [30] Losing weight by Ozempic is a fair representative example; to wit: Rather than to develop internal human merit through discipline (that will pay benefits in a myriad of other ways), society offers a merit-replacement drug for purchase. It's easy and fun, and it won't hurt a bit. And, most of the sages would unforgivingly (in a manner of speaking) go further to say that, by some additional manner of self-inflicted human disease of self virtue by lacking in fortitude or disciple, the takers are even expressively proud to admit their failure by doing the taking. [30.a, 30.b] Alas, the pain and side-effects always do come, one way or the other, as all the sages portend. [31, 32, 13.4] Yes, aspirin, Ozempic and opium have their respective purposes and limitations, and their side-effects, and their respective times.

The human body and the political body; thusly, the entire grand metaphor of Plato's Republic. So we listen to the political narratives carefully. [33]

Some tools make us stronger, and some tools make us weaker. Wisdom decides how excellence will be achieved, if not maintained. "What gets you there, keeps you there."

Is there any hard-working man to whom idleness is not a punishment? You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves. The first requisite of a good citizen in this republic of ours is that he shall be able and willing to pull his own weight. Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.

[34] As said in the immortal words at the direction of the genius Rob Reiner [*23], in The Princess Bride, "Life is pain. Anyone who says differently is selling something."

<< Back to Tarpeian Rock [#GRZ_205] - Recycle to Greatest Commandment [#GRZ_16] >>

[1] "Sugar, Darling, You Look Marvelous." The Business of Aesop? No. 54 - The Fox and the Crow. [#GRZ_40]

[2] Benefit and Burden

[3] Do As I Say, Not As I Do - The Business of Aesop? No. 103 - The Mother Crab [#GRZ_55]

[4] Hope, Prayer, Trust and Reliance Upon Luck; Or, the Ignoble Handouts Oft by Noble Emotions [#GRZ_137]

[5] Jesus and the (Other) Greatest Commandment [#GRZ_16]

[6] Disney's New Lion King - Cowardly or Brave? [Spoiler Alert-Maybe] - Stand for America? [#GRZ_94]

[7] Seneca.?On the Misfortune of Good Men.?Abridgment Series [#GRZ_18]

[8] The History of the Decline and Fall of the American Hegemony; Or, Seven Cardinal Deadlies—The Executive Summary [#GRZ_174]

[9] The History of the Decline and Fall of the American Hegemony—Chapter 2 Excerpt—National Debt [#GRZ_185]

[10] Theodore Roosevelt-The Strenuous Life - Abridgment Series [#GRZ_19]

[11] Oliver Wendell Holmes and His Imbeciles - Stand for America? [#GRZ_71]

[12] https://www.ushistory.org/documents/ask-not.htm

[12.b] A Bag of Talents, a Profitable Servant, and a Pile of Manure [#GRZ_173]

[13] The ONE LinkedIn Reference Set [#GRZ_183]: 13.1 ONE: 2368 [L19:11] ("Profitable Servant; Talents"); 13.2 ONE: 1734 [L17:7] ("Exceed Expectation, Unprofitable Servant"); 13.3 ONE: 525 [T5:38] ("Vengeance; Cheek"); 13.4 ONE: 988 [L12:54] ("Reading Signs") (“When you see?clouds?rising?in the West?you say then that it is going to rain—and it does. And, when you notice?that the wind?is blowing?from the South?you say that it is going to be hot—and it is. You hypocrites!? You know?how to interpret?the signs?of the earth?and the sky?but you not know how to interpret the present?crisis?of things.”)

[14] The Tarpeian Rock; Or, America's Hard Decisions [#GRZ_205]

[15] Failing to Die Is Killing Us, or Logan's Run Revisited -?Stand for America? [#GRZ_76]

[16] The Lincoln Leadership Dilemma; Or, The Primary Objective [#GRZ_176]

[17] The Priest-Patton Scale; Or, Objective-Based Leadership [#GRZ_162]

[18] The Warrior Mindset - Stand for America? [#GRZ_80]

[18.b] A Fool and His Country are Soon Parted; Or, The Late American Lifeboat Debate [#GRZ_171]

[18.c] TikTok v. QuickBooks? Preparing for Data War. "Good? Bad? I'm the guy with the gun." [#GRZ_133] "

[19] Extract From Cato's Speech Before the Roman Senate, After the Conspiracy of Cataline - Abridgment Series [#GRZ_206]

[20] The History of the Decline and Fall of the American Hegemony—Chapter 7 Excerpt—Wall Street [#GRZ_181]

[20.b1] Appreciating Team Members - No. 66. The Belly and Members- The Essential Aesop?- Back to Basics Abridgment Series [#GRZ_98_66]

[20.b2] "Menenius Agrippa, their chief spokesman, after much entreaty to the people, and much plain speaking on behalf of the senate, concluded, at length, with the celebrated fable. 'It once happened,' he said, 'that all the other members of a man mutinied against the stomach, which they accused as the only idle, uncontributing part in the whole body, while the rest were put to hardships and the expense of much labor to supply and minister to its appetites. The stomach, however, merely ridiculed the silliness of the members, who appeared not to be aware that the stomach certainly does receive the general nourishment, but only to return it again, and redistribute it amongst the rest. Such is the case,' he said, 'ye citizens, between you and the senate. The counsels and plans that are there duly digested, convey and secure to all of you, your proper benefit and support.'” Plutarch, Life of Coriolanus. Clough, Arthur Hugh. (pp. 440-441). Kindle Edition.

[20.b3]"Suppose the foot says, 'I am not a hand. So I don’t belong to the body.' By saying this, it cannot stop being part of the body. And suppose the ear says, 'I am not an eye. So I don’t belong to the body.' By saying this, it cannot stop being part of the body. If the whole body were an eye, how could it hear? If the whole body were an ear, how could it smell? ... As it is, there are many parts. But there is only one body. The eye can’t say to the hand, 'I don’t need you!' The head can’t say to the feet, 'I don’t need you!' In fact, it is just the opposite. The parts of the body that seem to be weaker are the ones we can’t do without. The parts that we think are less important we treat with special honor. The private parts aren’t shown. But they are treated with special care. The parts that can be shown don’t need special care. ... In that way, the parts of the body will not take sides. All of them will take care of one another. If one part suffers, every part suffers with it. If one part is honored, every part shares in its joy." Paul, 1 Corinthians 12:12-27

[21] Whom the Gods Would Destroy, They First Tease with Political Incorrectness [#GRZ_74]

[22] I Am Not Brainwashed, And Neither Are You.? Maybe.? But I Might be Wrong. [#GRZ_165]

[23] The Truth. Hard to Handle, Even Harder to Swallow. [#GRZ_178]

[24] Critical Thinking and the Conflation of Character, Integrity, Goodness and Virtue [#GRZ_148]

[24.b] Shut Up and Die Like an Aviator. Or, Quit Crying Like a Baby and Do Your Job [#GRZ_150]

[24.c] The Proseuché (The Prayer of Socrates) Ch. VIII [Prayer] [#GRZ_131]

[24.d] The Great Masquerade - Stand for America? [#GRZ_11]

[25] The Evolution of Revolution; Or Stopping the Revolution at 180°, And Not Going Full Circle [#GRZ_172]

[26] The Insecure Human Being - The Business of Aesop? No. 51 - A Fox Without a Tail [#GRZ_36]

[27] Think Ahead. The Thing From The Seed. - No. 57. The Swallow and Other Birds - The Essential Aesop? - Back to Basics Abridgment Series [#GRZ_98_57]

[27.b] All Men Are Not Created Equal, or Why Thomas Jefferson Got it Wrong - Stand for America? [#GRZ_78]

[28] On Empathy: To Give Empathy Is a Blessing; To Need Empathy Is a Curse [#GRZ_106]

[29] He Who Feeds Us Enslaves Us - The Business of Aesop? No. 64 - The Dog and the Wolf [#GRZ_42]

[30] Marlboro Man; You've Come a Long Way, Baby. [Branding, Part II] [#GRZ_143]

[30.a] The Insecure Human Being - The Business of Aesop? No. 51 - A Fox Without a Tail [#GRZ_36]

[30.b] Misery Loves Company - No. 51. The Fox Without A Tail - The Essential Aesop? - Back to Basics Abridgment Series [#GRZ_98_51]

[31] The Two Doors of Life: Pleasure and Pain; The One-Two Choice, Say Sages Aesop, Gracian, Jesus and Socrates [#GRZ_136]

[32] The Importance of Aesop to Socrates [#GRZ_100]

[33] The History of the Decline and Fall of the American Hegemony; Or, Seven Cardinal Deadlies—The Executive Summary [#GRZ_174]

[34] The Fable of the King and the Grain Master [#GRZ_177]

[35] The Great Masquerade - Stand for America? [#GRZ_11]

[#GRZ_207] "Verum catino optime servivit frigus." ("Truth is a dish best served cold."); "Ius societatis civilis beneficia meruit, non donata." ("The right to the benefits of civil society is earned, not gifted.""); "Non sumus quicquam quod emere possumus." ("We are not anything that we can buy."); "Corpus alit manus." ("The body feeds the hand."); "Omnia cedunt praecipuae utilitati communi." ("All things yield to the primary objective of the common good."); "Omnis lex est et cedit bono communi." ("All law exists and yields for the common good."); "Veritas scurra est, aut mendax. Nam semper ad me venit in specie desiderii mei. Postea hominem larvatum deprehendo." ("The Truth is a jokester, or a liar. For, each time, he comes to me in the exact appearance of my desire. I later discover that he wore a mask."); "Quid accipit ibi, custodit te ibi." ("What gets you there, keeps you there."); "Officium est alpha et omega boni. Officium non habet initium nec finem. Est integralis compage systemica." ("Duty is the alpha and omega of the good. Duty has no beginning or end. It is integral to the systemic framework."); "Positio ballerina non est naturalis, usque ad est." ("The posture of the ballerina is not natural, until it is.") ~grz

"The Truth is a jokester, or a liar. For, each time, he comes to me in the exact appearance of my desire. I later discover that he wore a mask." [35]

<< Back to Tarpeian Rock [#GRZ_205] - Recycle to Greatest Commandment [#GRZ_16] >>

* Gregg Zegarelli, Esq., earned both his Bachelor of Arts Degree and his Juris Doctorate from Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. His dual major areas of study were History from the College of Liberal Arts and Accounting from the Business School (qualified to sit for the CPA examination), with dual minors in Philosophy and Political Science. He has enjoyed Adjunct Professorships in the Duquesne University Graduate Leadership Master Degree Program (The Leader as Entrepreneur; Developing Leadership Character Through Adversity) and the University of Pittsburgh Law School (The Anatomy of a Deal). He is admitted to various courts throughout the United States of America.

Gregg Zegarelli, Esq.,?is Managing Shareholder of Technology & Entrepreneurial Ventures Law Group, PC.?Gregg is nationally rated as "superb" and has more than 35 years of experience working with entrepreneurs and companies of all sizes, including startups,?INC. 500, and publicly traded companies.?He is author of One: The Unified Gospel of Jesus, and The Business of Aesop? article series, and co-author with his father, Arnold Zegarelli, of The Essential Aesop: For Business, Managers, Writers and Professional Speakers. Gregg is a frequent lecturer, speaker and faculty for a variety of educational and other institutions.

? 2024 Gregg Zegarelli, Esq. Gregg can be contacted through LinkedIn.

See Article Index

https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/political-leadership-narrative-dont-worry-wont-hurt-zegarelli-esq--3hxke/

#GreggZegarelli #Socrates #Plato #ArnoldZegarelli #Aesop #Nietzsche #Seneca #TeddyRoosevelt #TheodoreRoosevelt #AbrahamLincoln #Kennedy #TheArnold #ArnoldSchwarzenegger #JaneFonda #OliverWendellHolmes #InfantSoldier #CardinalVirtues #Jesus #Zegarelli #GRZ_207

<< Back to Tarpeian Rock [#GRZ_205] - Recycle to Greatest Commandment [#GRZ_16] >>