Policy Vs Practices Part 2, Volume 1
Karanja Crews
?? Teacherpreneur | Educator | Event Curator | Entrepreneur | ?? Retired Teacher & Advocate for Teaching Excellence ?? Founder of Green Muse & Teaching With Purpose Inc
Here is another example of leadership choosing to practice compliance base leadership rather than investigate and change. Read part 1 of Policy Vs Practice here - https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/policy-vs-practice-why-portland-public-schools-failing-crews/
“Dear Friends,?
Yesterday two educators testified to hold the PPS School Board accountable for not following SB664, the law that requires Holocaust, Genocide, and education against racism. Check it out. Here is yesterday's meeting. Starts about 20 min in
In the end, the board members there had to vote on whether PPS was following the law and voted 3 to 2 in agreement with my complaint that the law SB664 is not being followed! SB664 specifically requires Holocaust, other Genocide, and specific systemic education against racism, prejudice, and stereotyping, which we proved they are not doing. After the vote, the district (pps) attorney immediately said they would hold the issue in abeyance for a follow-up meeting with more board members present. Please email [email protected] if you would like to stay informed on this issue.” Susie Anglada Bartley
The role of the school board in directing the superintendent is to provide guidance and oversight to ensure that the superintendent is carrying out the policies and decisions of the board effectively. According to Oregon state law, the school board has the authority to hire, evaluate, and terminate the superintendent.?
Once hired, it is up to the school board to provide direction and support to help the superintendent carry out their duties effectively. This may include setting goals for student achievement, establishing policies for personnel management, overseeing budgetary decisions, and monitoring compliance with state and federal laws.
The superintendent is responsible for implementing the policies established by the school board and managing day-to-day operations within the district. However, they must also work closely with the school board to ensure their decisions align with broader district goals and priorities.
To facilitate effective communication between the school board and superintendent, regular meetings are typically held between these two parties. During these meetings, issues related to district policies, finances, personnel management, or other areas may be discussed.
By providing direction and oversight to their superintendent, school boards can ensure that their district operates effectively and offers high-quality education for all students.
So imagine if we had a Board that has a collective vision with the community and with subject matter experts in the community like myself to lead the Superintendent rather than follow.?Superintendents are often not from the community, so there is a disconnect.
In conclusion, the recent testimony from educators and subsequent votes by the PPS School Board highlights the ongoing struggle between policy and practice in education. While state laws like SB664 may require certain actions, it is up to school boards to provide effective guidance and oversight to ensure compliance. By working collaboratively with subject matter experts and the community, school boards can lead their superintendents toward a shared vision for high-quality education. It is important that we continue to hold our leaders accountable for their actions and work towards creating a more equitable and just educational system. #PolicyVsPractice #EducationReform #CommunityEngagement
https://www.youtube.com/live/mWssK68DqMg?feature=share