Points in which a Manual QA Excels an Automation QA :

As most of the Manual QA(s) working in an IT Industry must have faced the same Question as I do. "In what things a manual QA performs better than an Automation QA ?" or "What are the things as a Manual QA you can perform better than an Automation QA ?" So, my Manual QA(s) here I came up with the some better points which might help you to tackle this kind of Questions in your IT Industries :

So, here are some noted points which makes a Manual QA to excel an Automation QA ;

1. Exploratory Testing: Manual testers are skilled at exploratory testing, where they can creatively and intuitively explore the software to discover defects that automated scripts might miss. They can identify unexpected issues and areas for improvement that automation might not cover.

1. Usability and User Experience Testing: Manual testers are essential for evaluating the user experience, including aspects like the software's design, intuitiveness, and overall satisfaction. They can provide valuable feedback from a user's perspective.
2. Adaptive and Evolving Projects: Manual testing is well-suited for projects with rapidly changing requirements, dynamic user interfaces, or ongoing design alterations. Testers can quickly adapt to changes and adjust their testing strategies accordingly.
3. Exploratory Testing: Manual testing is effective for exploratory testing, where testers don't follow predefined test scripts but explore the application to find defects and uncover unforeseen issues.
4. Initial Test Case Creation: While automation can help execute test cases efficiently once they are created, the creation of complex test cases and scenarios may require manual involvement, especially when dealing with new features or functionality.
5. Edge Cases and Unpredictable Scenarios: Manual testers can handle edge cases and scenarios that are difficult to automate due to their unpredictability or uniqueness. They can think on their feet and adapt to unusual situations.
6. Non-Functional Testing: Non-functional testing areas like performance, security, and compliance may require manual testing to assess subjective aspects and adapt to the changing threat landscape.
7. Early Testing in Agile Environments: In Agile development, manual testing can be more adaptive and conducive to early-stage testing before test scripts are fully developed.
8. Cross-Browser and Cross-Platform Testing: Manual testers can quickly adapt to test on different browsers, devices, and operating systems, ensuring compatibility without the need for extensive automation scripts.
9. Quick Validation and Smoke Testing: In certain situations, like verifying critical fixes or conducting quick sanity checks, manual testing can be faster and more efficient than writing and running automation scripts.

So, Now if someone questions you about your pros as a Manual QA you have the right answer right here in this Article.