Point-2-Ponder/Ver. 18.62621
The goal of this series of regular posts, until further notice, is to offer up for consideration points for contemplation represented by topical cognitive development.?This differs from submitting for consideration an ideal in which adoption or debate ensues.??As has been our thinking from the onset it’s not about creating adopters but developing mindsets, on your terms in such a way that respectful dialog can occur.?Without this cognitive development we are left with fact less and often emotional contention that polarizes not grows societal development.
Even the most active and creative thinkers have their moments.?As is often the case though occurs as a result of some form of environmental stimulus.?It may be the result of events, discussions, or that lingering thought that for some reason has come to the surface.?It’s this ebb and flow in discernment that creates points-to-ponder (P2P).?
1.??????Stop feeling you have the ability to change the world.?Your actions contribute enough to the condition (hopefully constructively),
2.??????It’s ok to be proud but?not your role to act as a spokesperson or loyalist, the appointed listen passively,
3.??????Measure your words, adverbs and pronouns are apt to ignite emotions, keep it rudimentary,
4.??????Remove all elements of hate or prejudice before engaging in an interchange.?If you leave the blocks charged with concrete prejudice and bias you will now only will be wasting time but nothing will change,
5.??????Stay within your range of understanding which is credibly based and on the result of weak sources, speculation or conspiracy theory,
6.??????Abstain from using sources that play to your agenda?which assumes that your goal is truth not justification.?Failing to do so will obscure added insight, awareness and vantage points that will then lead to inflamed confrontations,
7.??????Adopt a high level of decorum to avoid childish bickering,
8.??????Always express gratitude for the interchange,
领英推荐
9.??????Refrain from jumping into the grey fog of emerging matters.?Give some time for the topic to gain some level of clarity and stability,
10.??Vigilantly seek answers, ask questions, entertain conceptual clarity through examples, add time for contemplative digestion even when the matter has a well-established right/wrong condition,
11.??Abstain from summary judgements, name calling, generalizations, labeling and the ‘it depends’ argument (everything is tempered by circumstances and contextual).
12.??History is history and situations change unless there the choice is to repeat history.?Otherwise it would be insane to not strive for betterment in outcomes and relationshipts, and
13.??People view things differently and it’s these differences that produce disagreements.?We believe we are right and so do the opposing party.?Instead gain insight and perspective of each other instead of treating it as some sort of competition.
This should be enough to get your thoughts going and considering the what, why, how and use of the wisdom you should have gained.?Yes, we have our own opinions and ideas and yes we can share them with you.?Keep in mind however that the information we would provide would be used to further develop your own positions and tempered by your particular situational context.?Please feel free to engage in a free interchange by contacting us at [email protected] noting the particular topic under consideration.??More to come in upcoming weeks.
?
Freely Redistribute/Share With Our Permission ?2021
Clarity Group Global?is an intellectual decision validation institution dedicated to the support of leaders, companies and organizations that face challenging choices.?Making right decisions that produce significant value equates to less disruption and chaos,?"non-tradition made exceptional".
Examples and illustrations are used for purposes of contextually clarity.?These fervently adhere to our unwavering commitment to client confidentiality and should be construed as a ploy to self-promote.