[PODCAST] Chinese debt in Africa: how much is too much?

[PODCAST] Chinese debt in Africa: how much is too much?

African countries are once again binging on foreign debt. Across the continent, external debt has risen sharply, by almost 50% since 2010 according to data from the World Bank, to an estimated 416 billion dollars. Unlike 20-30 years ago when Africa turned to the west for cash, today China is the creditor of choice.

The Chinese are shelling out massive loans for ambitious infrastructure and development projects across the continent. Although the vast majority of these loans are concessional, that is they have very low interest rates, the money still needs to be paid back either in cash or, as is often the case in Africa, with natural resources. 

Case in Point: Kenya

This week's launch of the highly anticipated Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) in Kenya was widely hailed as a milestone by Chinese and Kenyan officials. The 427 km railway is the first major rail line built in Kenya since the famed "Lunatic Express" line was built by the British over a century ago. Although the SGR is helping to repair Kenya's badly-dilapidated rail infrastructure, critics contend that the 3.25 billion dollar price tag is just too expensive.

Undeterred by his critics, Kenyan president Uhuru Kenyatta celebrated the debut of the Nairobi to Mombasa line, “today, 122 years later and despite again a lot of criticism, we do not celebrate the Lunatic Express but the Madaraka Express that will begin to reshape the story of Kenya for the next 100 years,” he said at the SGR's opening ceremony on Wednesday.

For people old enough to remember the debt-crises of the 1980s and 1990s, there is an eery sense of "uh oh, here we go again" as Kenyatta and many of his African counterparts grab these low-interest Chinese loans with both hands.

Even as the media and politicians from both countries fawned over the SGR launch, the issue of the railway's cost and the subsequent debts loomed ever larger. By the end of the week, the Chinese apparently felt they had to respond to critics with a series of high profile reassurances that this new infrastructure will actually help Kenya to repay its debts. “The investment will give the money back since SGR is the largest infrastructural project in Kenya and it will lead to economic growth of the whole region, which means that the debt will be paid," said Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Zhang Ming.

Kenya's debt to China is steadily rising. The Chinese, according to the World Bank, now own 57% of the country's 416 billion dollar external debt. Kenyatta, for his part, does not seem too concerned by borrowing even more money from the PRC. In May, the president signed a deal during his latest trip to Beijing for an additional 3.59 billion dollars to build the next phase of the SGR from Naivasha to Kisumu.

For people old enough to remember the debt-crises of the 1980s and 1990s, there is an eery sense of "uh oh, here we go again" as Kenyatta and many of his African counterparts grab these low-interest Chinese loans with both hands. Given the desperate need to build infrastructure under more favorable conditions with the Chinese maybe this time it's different. Maybe. Or maybe not.

Nairobi-based international development economist and weekly columnist for the Kenyan newspaper Business Daily, Anzetse Were, is among a growing number of analysts who are becoming increasingly concerned about the prospect of a new African debt crisis. Anzetse joins Eric & Cobus from Nairobi to explain why she's worried that African states are not rapidly reforming their economies so as to generate the revenues needed to repay the billions of dollars in Chinese loans.

Join the discussion. Do you think African countries should take advantage of China's low-interest loans to finance massive infrastructure development or are you worried that all this borrowed money will crush economies already withering under the pressure from persistently low commodity prices that have hobbled their exports. Tell us what you think.

Facebook: www.facebook.com/ChinaAfricaProject

Twitter: @eolander | @stadenesque | @Anzetse

林海玉

广东省茂名市电白县旦场镇碧桂园凤凰酒店宴会DJ

7 年

是不是 becoming increasingly concerned about the prospect,的这样呢

Richard Yu-Hsing Chen

Taiwan Information Education Development Association

7 年

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9Z0eYHWFCI&t https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9_m20MCuGw I would advise people to actually check these documentary out before commenting. sure, it's made by Xinhua, so take that part with a grain of salt. but I find this to be at least a pretty good depiction of their part of the story. (which, granted, is certainly not the whole story.) I can't say I know the exact detail on the ground, but looking at the documentary for the Kenya SGR and reading the general articles it seems 1. the project hired a ton of local folks, mostly young people. and will continue to hire many of them. 2. there's pretty significant transfer of knowledge and skills. A good number of locals they even funded to go study in China. 3. the deal for China running the operation is fairly limited. (only 5 years) It seems to be a pretty big win for Kenya in general, that they could actually get a big infrastructure project done on time and in good order also has pretty obvious if hard to measure benefits in terms of foreign investor confidence. (the #1 thing really screwing up Africa overall is that no one trust their governance, neither locally nor internationally. ) I do agree with Ms. Anzetse Were's point that it would be most imperative that they can get some industrialization and export going and properly leverage the new railway. I suppose from the East Asian experience the most obvious to do would be to build up major industrial parks on the cost. either for light manufacturing or things like oil refinery . (or both. ) in the foreseeable term the quest to become a significant net exporter of things that ISN'T just natural resources is of the up most importance for almost all African states.

回复
高亮

上海工程局集团第四工程有限公司-重庆办事处主任

7 年

China's railway industry has entered the superheating, the technical level has been advanced level in the world, for help, but only for humanitarian help, because peace is the standard of China, in recent years, the rapid development of overseas projects proves this, the facilitation of transport can better develop the economy, therefore, China's approach is correct, is contributing to the development of the world.

高亮

上海工程局集团第四工程有限公司-重庆办事处主任

7 年

nice

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Eric Olander的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了