Plummeting oil prices 101: A cheat sheet
Scott Nyquist
Member of Senior Director's Council, Baker Institute's Center for Energy Studies; Senior Advisor, McKinsey & Company; and Vice Chairman, Houston Energy Transition Initiative of the Greater Houston Partnership
With the holidays around the corner, naturally my thoughts are turning to … oil prices. This will no doubt be a hot topic around many a dinner table (at least in Houston). So, as my gift, here are a few talking points that might be useful.
A little background: Over the past six months, the price of a barrel of oil has dropped from $107 to less than $56 as of December 19. This took prices to 2009 levels, and surprised just about everyone. Stock markets do not like surprises, and many global indexes have dropped, adding another wrinkle of worry to an already wobbly global economic recovery. Let’s consider some of the implications.
- The good news: For US consumers, this is excellent. A two-car family that drives 2,000 miles a month might have to buy 100 gallons. With the average price of a gallon costing $1.16 less than at the peak in April, that adds up to essentially a $120 a month raise. For American households, spending on gas is on track to be the lowest since 2003.
European and Japanese consumers, who drive much less and for whom taxes account for a much higher share of the price at the pump, will not benefit as much. Still, since both markets are importers, less expensive oil comprises a nice little economic boost. On the other hand, it also adds to the deflationary pressures that are hampering their ability to retire debt. Still, on the whole a net benefit.
Countries that subsidize the price of oil, such as India, will also benefit (though they really should seize the opportunity to cut such subsidies on the way to eliminating them altogether). Analysts reckon that every $20 fall in the price per barrel translates into 0.4% in global GDP growth.
- The bad news: Obviously, crashing prices are bad for oil companies; the S&P energy index has fallen more than 14% this quarter and high-cost producers may have to shut down some operations. The Financial Times has estimated that some $1 trillion in planned production projects are in danger of cancellation.
But the really crushing, and frankly scary, situation has to do with state-owned producers. The simple fact is that many of the places that rely most heavily on fossil fuels are not exactly easy. Plunging prices poke holes in state budgets and can have wider, even global, ripple effects. Consider:
Nigeria: The currency, the naira, is at its lowest level against the dollar since at least 1999.
Russia: The ruble is hemorrhaging, which is hardly surprising since oil and gas account for about three-quarters of the country’s exports. The weaker ruble will drive up the price of food; in addition, international banks hold a fortune in Russia debt. If that debt cannot be serviced, the still-fragile global financial system would get seriously hurt.
Venezuela: This place is already in such a mess that it had shortages of toilet paper. Debt default is a real possibility.
Iraq, Iran, and Libya rely almost entirely on oil for their export earnings and domestic budgets. In a region that is hardly short of it, more turmoil is hardly out of the question.
Even Norway is warning of a “severe downturn.”
- Don’t get used to it: What’s next? The thinking is all over the map on this one. Some analysts say prices will rebound in six months. Others think they will stay low for two years or more. Some believe prices will eventually come back to $100/barrel. Others say it will come back to a new equilibrium—perhaps $80. I say, I don’t know. I am not going to start predicting oil prices, which is an all but certain way to look foolish down the line.
I will say, however, that $60/barrel is not sustainable. Already, energy companies are cutting upstream investment. Also, at less than $60/barrel, a lot of higher-cost production is no longer economical; that includes a good deal of US shale. Both factors will reduce the amount of oil that reaches the market, and eventually drive prices up.
Probably, anyway. Saudi Arabia has indicated that its priority is to protect OPEC’s market share; therefore, the cartel has agreed not to cut production, at least for now. If Saudi decides to get more aggressive and produce more, that would obviously depress prices. But OPEC suffers with very low oil prices. On the whole, then, the long-term pressures are in the other direction—that is, up. Advice: Take that driving holiday sooner rather than later.
- And speaking of driving: When gas prices are high, electric cars are a lot more appealing because they are more economically competitive in terms of the total cost of ownership (meaning how much it costs to run a vehicle, taking everything into consideration). Low oil prices reduce the enthusiasm to explore alternative ways of driving. At the moment, the nascent electric car industry needs high oil prices the way they need charging stations; they are hurting under these circumstances. The share price of Tesla, for example, has slumped more than 20% since early September. Hybrid car sales are also suffering.
- No more peak oil? Please? This is one of those apparently fashionable ideas that simply cannot be killed completely dead, no matter how often reality contradicts it. “Peak oil” is the idea that oil production has maxed out, and that decline is therefore inexorable and inevitable. In the original declaration of peak oil, the US was supposed to run out of oil sometime in the 1960s, and the date keeps getting pushed back. This idea had a lot of advocates—even unlikely ones, such as Texas oil man T. Boone Pickens, who said in 2004 that "never again will we pump more than 82m barrels" a day of liquid fuels (we’ve been at 90 million and up for several years). Look at the chart at the top of the article: Yes, there was a peak and a decline, but in the last few years, thanks mostly to the exploitation of shale resources, there has also been recovery. Under peak oil theory, that cannot happen. But it has.
A better play than peak oil is to bet on the power of the market and the human ingenuity that powers it. High oil prices encouraged substitution on the demand side, in the form of better efficiency and other measures. They also encouraged innovation in terms of finding new sources of supply, such as oil sands in Canada and shale in the US. Basically, when oil prices went up, so did the interest in alternatives and their economic viability. There is no reason on earth, or under it, to expect that dynamic ever to change.
And on that note, I wish you all a happy and healthy 2015.
LinkedIn TOP VOICE for EV ??, Event MC, ??? The Electric & Eclectic Podcast Show Host, ?? Documentary Maker, Board Advisor, Harmonica Player, Business Consultant & Investor -Founder Electric Vehicles Outlook Ltd
9 年From what I read and listen to - no more than that, I envisage an oil price as low as $20. As I understand it, that is the 'marginal' cost for the Saudi's. Curiously, LinkedIn nearly turned that word into 'magical' as I typed it - funny that. All part of a bigger picture that has developed since you wrote this Scott which will continue to come into sharper focus. Without doubt however, the West remains the marionette.
International Board Advisor and Author
9 年This is worth reading. Short. Sharp.
VP/Practice Director-Business/Technology/TLS Transformation Consulting at ACOREII: A Consortium Of Reengineering Experts
9 年Hi Scott, Two quick points... 1) Of those countries most likely to feel the economic "crush" of lower oil prices, all those listed above, except for Norway, might really be feeling the economic crush of rampant "corruption" within their socio-economic-political system of governance. The lowering of oil prices is really only akin to lowering water levels in a body of water that has major rocks/boulders strewn across its bottom; it exposes the real problems and makes them much less deniable. 2) When it comes to the notion of peak oil, I hope - for humanity's sake - that it is not a "dead" concept. Why is that? Well, it's because the notion has been so misunderstood by the general public and media reporting it. What peak oil really represents is a resource that is becoming increasing difficult and costly to access. Put another way... the "easy pickin's" are rapidly residing into the distance in the rear view mirror. And without the advent of new (and often more costly and potentially environmentally damaging/hazardous) technologies, the likelihood of being able to meet humanity's ever-increasing demand (with affordable product) is diminishing rapidly.
Could you comment on the impact you see this having on the investment push into Mexico with the opening of the energy industry in 2014? Particularly for ExxonMobil and Chevron who I believe had signaled US$50B in investment in the next two years?
Curious Learner, Communicator, Nature Enthusiast, Keen Reader
9 年I never remember the price of bread or milk, but I do remember the price of gas, as most consumers do. It is a welcome respite.