Play It Like A Tech Co., Rivian Opens Up Its Van Orders, Cityscoot In Bankruptcy, Cruise's Problems Continue - MOBILITY BRIEF_ ??????? - November 10th
Hune Mobility
A place for sharing highlights, analysis and market data for the ever changing mobility industry.
Good Friday everybody, it's time for your weekly Mobility Brief! ???
On the menu this week
HIGHLIGHT - ?? Play It Like A Tech Co: An History of Failure From Auto Legacies
Will history repeat itself, or has the lesson been learned? Not a year goes by without a legacy carmaker claiming it’s turning into a digital tech company. Yet, most of their moves ultimately turns into disarray: whether it’s an in-house initiative or a start-up acquisition, it always seems a bit like mixing oil and water. With an eventful week on this matter, a little throwback to some illustrations of this trend.
雷诺 officially launched this Wednesday their EV and software pureplayer called Ampere . Does it ring you any bell? If the split of a carmaker in an EV pure player and an ICE-legacy entity is quite unseen, the digital tech side reminds us of Volkswagen Group’s software division, CARIAD. Launched under the helm of Herbert Diess, the turmoil surrounding the company precipitated its downfall in the German carmaker hierarchy and jeopardized VW brand’s EV offensives. With quality issues and multiple delays, CARIAD solutions have been struggling to convince both the group’s customers and the brand themselves, ultimately pushing them into the arms of their arch enemy, Google, as Porsche confirmed last week turning to the Mountain View company to provide their next infotainment OS. However, Renault is not copy-pasting the same strategy, as the company is rather willing to weave its web onto the EV market by providing a thorough digital experiences through partnerships (also including Google), while focusing its in-house efforts into differentiation drivers. But that won’t exempt them from the same pitfalls as CARIAD’s issues seem to stem from the strategy execution rather than the strategy itself, as ambitious as it is.
Digital tech in cars is no new topic. Electronics have made their way into our cars decades ago, and even connectivity, touchscreens and ADAS introduction in our cars have preceded the birth of the new wave of neo-manufacturers like Tesla. Yet, they couldn’t fathom how to take advantage of this situation. Is it the start-up mindset that makes the difference? Well, we can’t blame for trying, as manufacturers have quickly set offices in the Silicon Valley in the hope to catch a whiff of this holy spirit. Yet, we can’t say it brought them many success.
So what is the problem for legacies? Maybe it’s their hardware-centric mindset, which puts the car itself at the center of their timelines, seeing software as a component of a car rather than a product itself, and mostly ignoring its offboard dependencies with an IS often considered as a cost centre instead of an opportunity vector. Hence it’s no surprises to see similar recipes from car manufacturing applied to their digital projects: a software time-to-market linked with car releases (car-centric), always including outdated legacy products into new IS systems instead of decoupling to enhance the experience on newer products (cost-killer mindset), thorough quality control even for non-core software products delaying their time-to-market (safety focus), an outsourcing culture from consulting to coding that prevents any accountability and continuity, etc… Even the safety culture is not leveraged where it should be: Cruise, the General Motors-owned start-up, has been under the spotlight the wrong way by withdrawing damning evidences to public authorities in a crash with a pedestrian, and knowingly keeping their vehicles running while having troubles recognizing both children and road construction holes. A behaviour which was most expected from the likes of the Big Tech instead of legacy carmakers. The price to pay from the increasing pressure on them while their wallets are shrinking under the hammer of the EV transition?
Anyway, don’t get us wrong: we just shared our thoughts, and it may be obvious ones and things already said and heard. It’s far from an easy topic. Looking through the European prism, it’s even harder as you suffer from the lack of big tech benchmark companies on the Old Continent compared to what China and the US can produce. So it’s no surprise to see Renault and Stellantis recruit profiles from Amazon (Ned Curic, Stellantis CTO) or Microsoft (Henry Bzeih, Software & Systems at Ampere) to lead their way on this twisted path. But as China Auto advances by leaps, is it relevant to keep looking to the West for inspiration?
Are we in the wrong? Do you agree? Share us your thoughts in the comments or even by DM for more discretion! We’re genuinely interested in hearing your thoughts!
?? This Week In The Mobility World
???Appointments (& resignations)
???Micromobility News
???Factories Updates
???Tech Updates
领英推荐
?? EV Updates
???New Car Reveals
???Investment/Financial Updates
?? Bookmark Of The Week
Cruise Knew Its Self-Driving Cars Had Problems Recognizing Children - And Kept Them On The Streets - The Intercept
“Several months ago, Vogt became choked up when talking about a 4-year-old girl who had recently been?killed ?in San Francisco. A 71-year-old woman had taken what local residents?described ?as a low-visibility right turn, striking a stroller and killing the child. “It barely made the news,” Vogt?told ?the New York Times. “Sorry. I get emotional.” Vogt offered that self-driving cars would make for safer streets.
Behind the scenes, meanwhile, Cruise was grappling with its own safety issues around hitting kids with cars. […] The materials note results from simulated tests in which a Cruise vehicle is in the vicinity of a small child. “Based on the simulation results, we can’t rule out that a fully autonomous vehicle might have struck the child,” reads one assessment. In another test drive, a Cruise vehicle successfully detected a toddler-sized dummy but still struck it with its side mirror at 28 miles per hour.”
@ Sam Biddle ( The Intercept )
See you next week and don't forget to share and subscribe to the newsletter!
Quoted this week: Henry Bzeih, Ampere, Ampere Software Technology, Renault Group, Cityscoot, Alpine, Polestar,Lucid Motors, Rivian, Public Investment Fund (PIF), European Parliament