Planning the end of the diesel and gasoline engine
IMAGE: Volodymyr Horbovyy?—?123RF

Planning the end of the diesel and gasoline engine

The UK’s Conservative government has announced a total ban on the sale of gasoline or diesel vehicles from 2040, joining other European countries with similar plans such as France, which aims to accompany it in addition to a total ban on coal in 2025; the Netherlands, which has set a 2025 deadline; or Norway, which, while saying it won’t impose a total ban in 2025, does say it will restrict fossil fuels to the point of making them a very unattractive option (probably more than enough for the country that leads the adoption of electric vehicles worldwide). Four major cities, Athens, Mexico City, Madrid and Paris, have announced that they are studying plans to ban diesel vehicles in their central areas.

The response to the British government’s proposals has largely been negative: a smokescreen, and that 23 years is far too long and that at this rate, the United Kingdom could become one of the last countries in Europe to abandon fossil fuels.

Europe seems increasingly determined to set a deadline for the elimination of diesel and gasoline engines, which, according to some studies, are responsible for the deaths of some three million people a year. Following Volvo’s announcement it is to partially withdraw its diesel and gasoline engines and to opt for hybrid and 100% electric vehicles, other firms have followed suit with similar plans, while calling for measures to accelerate the transition to electric vehicles.

Can something so crucial to the future of the planet really be left for 23 into the future? Announcing a ban on the sale of diesel and gasoline vehicles in 2040 assumes that, as of that year, there could still be several decades over which the owners of those vehicles could stretch out their life and continue to pump noxious fumes into the atmosphere. In response, some commentators are arguing we need a radical transformation of the industrythat would see the end of sales to private owners, and instead regulate car use through fleets.

The British government’s announcement is undoubtedly, a step in the right direction. But it is a very short step, a deeply conservative time frame that reduced its political dimension. That said, more and more countries are determined to end the age of the internal combustion engine, which is a good thing. The issue comes down to what is best for the greater good. Now what our governments need to do is stop thinking about winning votes and start focusing on introducing measures that will be unpopular at first, but that will be in everybody’s interests in the longer term.



(En espa?ol, aquí)



David Faik

Powerhouse Procurement Manager ★ Contingent Workforce ★ IT ★ HR ... I help multinationals manage and buy all types of labor better, through stakeholder input and optimized processes

7 年

I understand that this may be more viable in countries like Australia with very large (geographically speaking) grids and plenty of sunshine (for solar). As most cars are parked at home evenings, the car batteries can act like a huge buffer when all those aircos turn on, and then charge up more fully in the early hours of dawn. In any case the idea I saw mooted is that it could help smooth demand on the grid. Steven Herbert - you're very up on all this. Is my comment the case of a little knowledge being a dengerous thing or are there some possibilities in these types of circumstance?

回复
George Wilson

Quality Engineering & Management

7 年

“The?reports of my death?are greatly exaggerated.”, colloquial variation of Paine’s line regarding Samuel Clemen's (Mark Twain) having been reported dead while on your in London in 1895. Consider the fuel, gasoline is an engineering marvel, while the combustion engine just keeps getting better. There are sound reasons that after more than 100 years since the first electric car, the electrics haven't taken over. :-(

Steve Herbert

Forrester Acclaimed Market Strategist, SaaS Innovator, and Tech Entrepreneur.

7 年

IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN the AA has now crunched the numbers - it would require 10 new nuclear power stations to be built to sustain the nightly charge of an all electric vehicle population in the UK alone. It would also require at least 2,000,000 home phase 1 charging stations to be delivered as well as over 200,000 Tesla style 'Super Chargers' to be placed around the country instead of fuel pumps (It takes 75 minutes for a 'Super Charger' to fully charge a Tesla so to say it would cause chaos if there were insufficient super chargers is an understatement. Service stations would need to increase in size 10 fold to cope with adhoc vehicle charging. This is what happens when you leave life changing strategy to dangerous radicals like #NicolsHulot and #MichaelGove

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了