Planet FWD Supports Data Collaboration over Competition
Have you been told that your existing carbon accounting data "can't be used" by a new sustainability partner? If so, you should be skeptical. This kind of data gatekeeping isn't just frustrating – it's counterproductive to real progress.
When providers tell you to discard your existing LCA data and start over, they're not just asking you to duplicate work. They're asking you to delay meaningful climate action, waste resources, and potentially lock yourself into a closed system that limits your future options.
At Planet FWD, we see a concerning trend emerging in the decarbonization software landscape: the creation of closed ecosystems that force companies to repeatedly measure the same emissions using different providers' methodologies. This approach not only wastes valuable time and resources but risks slowing down the urgent work of climate action.
The reality is that if your emissions data follows recognized methodological standards like the GHG Protocol and ISO LCA standards, it should be usable across platforms and frameworks. Anything else is an artificial barrier.
The Power of Open Data Standards
Our commitment to open collaboration is built on two core principles:
Understanding Appropriate Uses of LCA Data Across Providers
When your LCA data follows recognized methodological standards, there are many valid ways to leverage this information across different platforms and systems. Let's clarify what's appropriate and what isn't:
领英推荐
Appropriate Uses of LCA Data
When Additional Analysis May Be Needed
The key is transparency: as long as your LCA data follows recognized standards and methodologies, it should be able to contribute meaningfully to your broader emissions management efforts. Forcing companies to restart their analysis using a different provider's methodology, when they already have standards-compliant data, creates unnecessary barriers to progress.
Collaboration Over Competition
The challenges of decarbonization are too complex and urgent for any single company to solve alone. That's why we've designed our platform to be inherently collaborative, allowing companies to:
Empowering Decarbonization Through Choice
We believe you should have the freedom to choose the tools and partners that best suit your needs, without being locked into a single provider's ecosystem. This philosophy of open collaboration and data interoperability isn't just about making things easier for businesses – it's about accelerating the collective action needed to address climate change.
NatureTech ?? Biodiversity Conservation ?? Ecological Restoration ?? Nature-based Solutions
4 周This is exactly what I tell my students! Understanding the accepted standards enables them to critique different software platforms to ensure reports generated are comparable and usable by investors, vendors and regulators. I wrote about this here: https://www.dhirubhai.net/feed/update/activity:7293715380781375489
Sustainability | Climate Tech
4 周The barriers are high enough for companies trying to make a positive impact. Let's build ladders instead of more barriers!
Grant Writer/ Aquaculturist/ Empowering Smallholders farmers for Global Market A?cess/ Access Agriculture Ambassador
4 周This is real collaboration not competition I concur !
Founder @ Planet FWD + Moonshot ?? On a mission to decarbonize the world.
4 周"Collaboration over competition" always!