No Place for Health Care in a Free Market Economy
John D. Couris
Florida Health Sciences Center | Tampa General Hospital Research Fellow University of South Florida Muma College of Buisness
Last week, Florida State Senator Rob Bradley, introduced legislation (SB 676) which seeks to repeal the Certificate of Need program here in Florida. Despite the potential for an increase in cost and decrease in quality, that would come with deregulation, Governor Rick Scott has expressed his support of the legislation.
As I have explained in my previous posts, the Certificate of Need program is a regulatory process that requires certain health care providers to obtain state approval before offering new or expanded services. The CON program in Florida regulates the construction of new hospitals, hospices, skilled nursing facilities, and care facilities for the developmentally disabled, as well as certain hospital services.
As you also know, I oppose the deregulation of CON, in particular as it relates to the creation and expansion of inpatient care. I have outlined in significant detail the negative effects deregulation of CON would have in previous posts but in short, I believe it will have a negative impact on cost, quality and access to health care in our state. However, Senator Bradley, Governor Scott, and those who support the elimination of CON believe that free market forces will improve quality while lowering costs.
And while I staunchly believe in free market economics, the reality is that health care does not operate in a free market space. In a free market economy, prices, quality and quantity of goods and services are determined by the open market and consumers. In addition, the government imposes very little - if any - restrictions and regulations on the forces of supply and demand that drive the costs of goods and services.
Hospital pricing cannot be determined by a free market system because a hospital cannot set their own pricing for services. Hospitals are reimbursed for services based on rates established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and thus, must work with insurance providers and government agencies to negotiate wholesale pricing. In addition, hospitals cannot provide or deny services based on a patient’s ability to pay, making the system of supply and demand irrelevant. For example, if a patient comes to the ER requiring stiches, federal law requires that they be treated even if they do not have insurance or the money to cover the cost of the treatment they received.
Additionally, hospital and health care pricing is also incredibly complicated and there is a scarcity of price information out there for consumers. This makes shopping for certain types of health care services incredibly difficult and many times, consumers won’t know exactly what they owe for a procedure until they get the bill. There also tends to be significant variety in pricing from provider to provider and cost does not always directly correlate to quality. This is yet another complication when it comes to health care in a free market space.
When new hospitals come into the region due to deregulation, they will look to compete for patients with insurance coverage or the financial means to pay for their own care. And so, while I am a big believer in free market economics and know the positive effects it has on many sectors of our economy, free market economics and deregulation simply don’t work when it comes to health care. Despite the belief of those who support the legislation, it will drive up costs and decrease quality. Take it from someone who has been working to provide quality health care to the consumer for the past 20 years.
And so what, now? As I have said before, I think here in Florida we can buck the trend, put party politics and ideology aside and come together in the spirit of doing the right thing for our State when it comes to access to high quality and affordable health care. I don’t think we need to rush bills into the legislature but instead, we can sit down at the same table and thoughtfully engage with each other to work towards a positive outcome that puts consumers and our neighbors first.
It is in this spirit that I want to challenge our legislators to put together a statewide “blue ribbon” working group comprised of legislators, health care leaders, physicians, medical professionals and patient advocates. The mission of this group will be simple: to come together, roll up its collective sleeves and work toward providing the highest quality and most affordable health care for this State’s most precious resource—Floridians.
Finally, if you are concerned about how the deregulation of CON and specifically, Senate Bill (SB 676) will affect your access to high quality and affordable health care, I encourage to reach out to your legislators and make your voice heard.
Gynecologist-retired
7 年When the evolution of healthcare from a privilege to right became reality is when this became very relevant and true.
Business Consultant at Self Employed
7 年John for the first time I think you are wrong regarding con. A number of states don't have con and I have seen no evidence that costs are higher or quality is lower. Also there is more innovation going on in non con states with new care models. Rather than fight for continuing taxi medallions in Florida I think you can be wildly successful with your innovation strategy. Go north young man! ??
Director of Strategy & Planning @ Riley Children’s Health
7 年John Couris, we are working through similar discussions in Iowa right now. https://blog.iowahospital.org/2017/02/08/iowa-still-needs-certificate-of-need/
Semi-Retired Policy Wonk at Have Project, Will Consider
7 年Honest question...how can much of the healthcare system ever be a free market? You need a willing seller and a willing buyer to set a fair value price, but someone coming into the system through the emergency room can never be a willing buyer, only a price taker.
CEO at Poiesis Medical
7 年Do not wish to step into this to be yelled at by uninformed and mean spirited individuals... So Stefani, please do not comment unless you can respect the fact that someone (John) has taken the conversation public. Open communication is how things get done typically even when you do not agree. Case in point I do not agree as I believe natural selection will take care of any oversupply issue. The issue I have IF a lack of innovation is causing problems in the current healthcare market then we need disruptors. There are many examples of how thinking outside the box Uber, Tesla, Amazon, iPhones, DeVinic device, Box, SpaceX, etc etc solved major issues and ones most of us never imaged would could take place. The key is there has to be an incentive, by closing a market, nobody will fund any attempts to change the current environment. So in business, you scale, innovate and have the best model. This dictates competition not artificial barriers.