Pipeline Prioritization in Rare Disease Drug Development - Lessons from Recent Cases
Christian Girard
Corporate Advisor | Alternative Funding | Orphan Drugs | Rare Pediatric Disease Designation | Priority Review Voucher
Executive Summary – In the rare disease and orphan drug landscape, strategic pipeline prioritization is essential for companies pursuing multiple indications with a single therapeutic candidate, especially when Rare Pediatric Disease Designations (RPDDs) are involved. The experiences of Bluebird Bio, Omeros, and others offer insights into the regulatory nuances of these programs. Bluebird Bio, for example, faced a setback when the FDA declined to award a second Priority Review Voucher (PRV) for Zynteglo, which already had a PRV for another indication. Omeros, with its drug zaltenibart (OMS906), is strategically developing the treatment for both paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G) under different designations, yet must carefully navigate PRV eligibility. Industry leaders like Sarepta Therapeutics, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, and Alexion (now part of AstraZeneca Rare Diseases) illustrate the benefits of thoughtful prioritization. Sarepta’s approach with multiple gene therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, Catalyst’s success with Firdapse for rare neuromuscular disorders, and Alexion’s work on complement-mediated conditions showcase how PRVs can enhance market presence when combined with regulatory and market strategies. As PRV values continue to rise, evidenced by recent sales like Ipsen’s $158M transaction, companies must strategically prioritize indications, leverage comprehensive clinical data, and remain aware of market dynamics to optimize their position in the rare disease sector.
In the evolving landscape of drug development for rare and orphan diseases, companies face unique challenges and opportunities when navigating regulatory designations such as RPDD. The recent experiences of for examples, Bluebird Bio and others, highlight important considerations for firms prioritizing their pipelines while pursuing multiple indications for the same therapeutic agent.
The Case of Bluebird Bio – Bluebird Bio faced a setback when the FDA declined to grant a second PRV for its drug Zynteglo (betibeglogene autotemcel), which had already received approval for one indication. The FDA's decision underscored the complexities involved in obtaining multiple regulatory designations for a single product. Companies must maintain a robust clinical data package and a clear value proposition when attempting to expand their drug's indications. This situation emphasizes the need for companies to be strategic in their planning and communication with regulatory agencies.
Omeros and Zaltenibart's Journey – Omeros’s zaltenibart (OMS906) exemplifies the dual challenge of pursuing multiple indications under different designations. Zaltenibart has received Orphan Drug Designation for treating paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and RPDD for complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G). However, if the drug gains FDA approval for PNH, it will not be eligible for a PRV for its subsequent approval for C3G. This potential scenario highlights the importance of carefully assessing the regulatory landscape and potential market dynamics when prioritizing indications. As the demand for PRVs remains high due to a limited supply, strategic decisions on which indication to pursue first can significantly impact a company's valuation and funding opportunities.
Strategic Implications for Companies – The need for strategic pipeline prioritization is underscored by the limited availability of PRVs and the competitive nature of the rare disease market. Companies like Sarepta Therapeutics, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals (now part of AstraZeneca Rare Diseases) exemplify how effective management of pipeline strategies can lead to successful outcomes.
Strategic Considerations – For companies focused on rare and orphan diseases, the experiences of Bluebird Bio and others illustrate the need for thorough pipeline prioritization. Here are several strategic considerations:
Broader Implications for Rare Disease Companies – The broader context of the rare disease market reveals a competitive environment where companies must balance their R&D efforts with regulatory realities. The limited availability of PRVs, highlighted by recent sales such as Ipsen's PRV for $158M, signals a growing market for these designations. Companies must be proactive in monitoring market trends and adapting their strategies accordingly.
Conclusion – The landscape for rare disease therapeutics is intricate and ever-changing. Companies focusing on developing treatments with RPDD for one indication while exploring another must navigate a maze of regulatory challenges and market dynamics. As illustrated by Bluebird Bio and others, thoughtful pipeline prioritization and strategic regulatory engagement are essential to maximizing the potential of their therapies. By learning from these experiences and understanding the regulatory implications of their decisions, companies can position themselves favorably in the competitive rare disease sector.
References: These references provide a robust basis for understanding the landscape of rare disease drug development and the role of regulatory designations like PRVs in the strategic planning of companies focused on these markets.
领英推荐
Authors
Dr. Nana Mainoo, PharmD, MA
Chief Executive Officer at Cleracs Consulting
Email: [email protected] | Cell +1?757?401 3218
With over 16 years of experience in the healthcare industry, Nana has held key roles at Pfizer and Komodo Health and co-founded Medsfinder, a healthtech platform. As CEO of Cleracs Consulting, he specializes in regulatory strategy, focusing on orphan drug regulatory affairs. Nana holds a Doctor of Pharmacy from Nova Southeastern University, a Master of Arts from IE Business School, and certificates in Health Leadership and Finance from INSEAD and Cornell University, respectively, along with a Bachelor of Pharmacy from KNUST.
Christian Girard, MiM
Co-Founder at The PRV Fund Project
Email: [email protected] | Cell/WhatsApp: +33?667?266?092
Christian is a co-founder of The PRV Fund, an initiative focused on providing non-dilutive funding to early-stage biotech companies developing treatments for rare pediatric-onset disorders. Christian has over 30 years professional background marked by his commitment to advancing rare pediatric disease drug development, from lab bench to approval. His involvement in this sector highlights his dedication to supporting innovative therapies aimed at improving the lives of children with rare diseases. He is a graduate of ESCP Europe, an European business school.
Dr. Jean Chatellier, PhD
Partner, EVP & Managing Director at KYBORA
Email: [email protected] | Cell/WhatsApp: +33 609 102?105
Jean is a Partner and EVP at KYBORA, a global advisory firm specializing in M&A, licensing, fundraising, and strategic advisory services in biopharma. He contributed to the divestiture of Bayer’s PRV to argenx for $98M [1]. With over 24 years of experience, he has held key leadership roles, including CBO at Besins Healthcare and pivotal positions at Avadel Pharmaceuticals, Micromet (now Amgen), and Crucell (now J&J). He was the founding CEO of Avidis (now Osivax) and has worked with Nobel laureates during his postdoctoral research. Jean holds a PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and has led significant industry partnerships and transactions throughout his career.
[1] On November 2020, argenx enters into agreement to acquire Priority Review Voucher https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/11/23/2131371/0/en/argenx-Enters-Into-Agreement-To-Acquire-Priority-Review-Voucher.html.