Picking A Strategy for U.S. Artificial Intelligence Strategy

Picking A Strategy for U.S. Artificial Intelligence Strategy

The United States’ geopolitical strategy will certainly change entering the next year and next administration. But, what will not change, is the imperative to decide how to move forward in strategizing about AI. Should the U.S. share its technology freely with allies and partners, restrict its proliferation, leverage it to make geostrategic gains on the world stage, or do a little of everything? All of this will need to be weighed alongside perennial national security and economic constraints.?

Sam Winter-Levy lays out the three paths to take for defining the United States’ AI strategy in a recent paper. To inform decisionmakers and interested constituents, Winter-Levy breaks down important elements for consideration as a strategy develops to deal with this emerging technology. Read more here.

Elsewhere at Carnegie

  1. Subsea Communication Cables in Southeast Asia: A Comprehensive Approach Is Needed, by Elina Noor
  2. Toward a Cleaner, Smarter USMCA, by C.J. Mahoney and Peter Harrell
  3. Can Democracy Survive the Disruptive Power of AI?, by Raluca Csernatoni, PhD
  4. Developing AI Risk Management With the Same Ambition and Urgency as AI Products, by Holden Karnofsky
  5. Securing Europe’s Subsea Data Cables, by Sophia Besch, PhD & Erik Brown ?
  6. Grand Tamasha’s Best Books of 2024, by Milan Vaishnav
  7. Election-Related Protests Surged in 2024, by Thomas Carothers & Judy L.
  8. How South Africa Can Use Its G20 Presidency to Reduce the Cost of Developing Countries’ Debt, by David McNair
  9. NATO’s Northeast Countries Have a Template for Europe’s New Security Reality, by Daniel Baer and Sophia Besch, PhD

Media


Elston "Swede" Stephenson, OHST

Former Safety Director & OIC Southeast Asia JPAC

1 个月

"Not So Grand" - A Comprehensive Case Study of Grand Canyon National Park, OSHA, OSC, and Others' Leadership and Safety Culture Exhibit F: Possible “Loss of Life From [15kv] Electrocution” WARNING issued to Grand Canyon by APS Feb 2, 2021 discovered by Safety Officer Mar 1, 2021. Alleged inaction to protect workers led Safety Officer to file OSHA + OSC complaints. OSHA Phoenix's actions caused notification to 2 former Asst. Secretaries of Labor—OSHA Administrators + OSHA IG + OSC complaints. (9thCir Exhibit L pgs 201-203; J-10 pgs 736-763) Audio evidence: Mar 2, 2021 Safety Officer briefed Grand Canyon Park Senior Executive Team + Supt's of the WARNING (00:05:45) Evidence is Supts had the APS WARNING letter but did not share or warn others https://lnkd.in/gEHr85h7 By Mar 22, 2021, no action to warn/protect workers per ‘General Duty Clause’ (29USC §654(a)(1) + 29CFR§1910.303(g)(2)(i)) Evidence is OSHA coordinated site inspection without notifying Complainant, “employees”, or APS Lineman violating OSH Act (29CFR §1903.8(a)) OSHA issued a “No Violations Found” letter Approx $2,000,000 spent to fix the “No violations” Thank you Swede 9TH CIRCUIT https://lnkd.in/gfPPGn5w Great Illustration at 00:07:45 https://lnkd.in/gXWmuY9C

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了