Phone Eats First
Let’s talk about charcuterie boards. They are the epitome of what I want to talk about today, but what that is will be revealed in just a second. The actual word charcuterie means either a collection or cured/processed meats or a store that sells them, but charcuterie board means something quite different now. When people hear the term they think of a collection of thinly sliced cold meat, cheese, jams, spreads, olives, pickles, and even general fruits and vegetables arranged beautifully on a tray. These boards can range from a small and simple board at a restaurant for ~$10 to an elaborate and absurdly elegant spread for ~$100. They are often quite delicious, but the truly tasty ones typically have a minimum price point of about $25. All that being said, it is clear charcuterie boards are considered quite fancy and a unique treat for anyone.
Okay so what's the point?
The reason I wanted to go into that somewhat longer explanation of charcuterie boards is that they are a fascinating example of one of the new ways food is being transformed into not just a gastrointestinal experience, but a photogenic and aesthetic experience. It is a fascinating transformation from the days of simple food being prepared in the most delicious way to only the most luxurious 5-star restaurants having this style of food preparation to many smaller restaurants and even dive bars preparing food in more than just a taste bud pleasing style. The real question is why though this transformation is occurring and whether or not it is a good or bad thing (at least in my opinion).
One of the biggest contributors to this transformation is simply the evolution of restaurants from just a random building that serves delicious homemade cooking to the rating of restaurants and the feeling of a need to differentiate and stand out from the competition. The bigger factor, however, is the rise of technology, more specifically Instagram and Snapchat. Now that people can photograph their meals, they want them to not only taste good, but look good enough to show them off to their friends. This has led to the popular expression, “phone eats first” and the sharp increase in chefs creating more photogenic dishes. Of course this is not the case at all restaurants, but especially in restaurants geared to younger generations there is certainly a concerted effort to create a more beautiful dish.
After I made this avocado toast with fried eggs (above), I couldn't help but take a picture
This trend has also expanded to those cooking up meals at home. I am not the one to normally take pictures of my food, but I won’t lie that when I cook up a particularly good looking meal I can’t help but take a picture. I also have made my fair share of charcuterie boards and certainly work harder than I used to in making them aesthetically pleasing. Clearly this trend or prettier dishes to be shared with friends on social media has taken over many aspects of our lives -- especially the younger generations -- but as I mentioned before I do have an opinion on if this is a good or bad trend.
The good, the bad, and the ugly
Personally, I think this trend does more bad than it does good. There are two main reasons for my belief. The first is that the cost of a quality meal at many restaurants has gone up, and no it's not just the decrease in the value of the dollar. There are still many places where someone can get a quality burger for $5, but those places are declining in numbers. Many of them are being pushed to make their food more photogenic and unique and that often requires using more expensive ingredients. Many of them have also realized they can get more bang for their buck if they make their burger or sandwich or whatever just a little prettier and charge more for it. This is not a great trend for our wallets, but the other reason that I dislike this trend is I believe it takes away from the true art of cooking. Truly good cooks toss whatever quantity of whatever thing they believe works best together into a dish and for many years all that matter was how it tasted, not how it looked. Now, a good cook must in many cases focus more on the presentation. This takes their talents away from the actual combination of the perfect ingredients and in the long-run may actually degrade the quality of their dish. Of course this isn’t necessarily the case, but I know I certainly have eaten a beautiful meal and had it taste way worse than expected.
Above is a great example of a delicious sandwich that is all content and less prettiness
There are of course also benefits to a more beautifully presented dish. The main one being that it often pushes chefs to use more inventive ingredients, which can result in a more unique and delicious meal. I love meals with more unique and surprising ingredients, but it does not always work out, especially with a less talented chef. It is also nice to see a pretty meal because it excites people when they are about to eat it and it may even taste better because their brain perceives it as tasting fancy. I love seeing posts of photogenic food, but that doesn’t mean there are not downsides as well.
Yeah, yeah let's wrap this up Noah
All that being said, I am sure many reading this will have differing opinions than me and I mean no offense to anyone in my comments. I am simply reflecting from my chefs perspective and from having made, eaten, and taken pictures of pretty food many times before. It will be interesting to see how this trend develops as I already see some people getting more excited about hole-in-the-wall places that are truly authentic, cheap, and don’t care about the look of their dishes. Anyway, that is my soliloquy for now and I’ll be back next week with something new to discuss!
James Madison University Alum
3 年Oh, do I remember that yummy avocado and egg because I took the same picture just seconds after. Great article!
Senior Corporate Sustainability Advisor, KOR Consulting - Fr.A.U.
3 年Here's a fascinating related study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262615300178 Excerpts: ..."It could well be argued that?‘visual?hunger’?– a concept that we define here as a natural desire, or urge, to look at food – could well be an evolutionary adaption: Our brains learnt to enjoy seeing food, since it would likely precede consumption. The automatic reward associated with the sight of food likely meant another day of sufficient nutrients for survival, and at the same time, the physiological responses would prepare our bodies to receive that food. Our suggestion here is that the regular exposure to virtual foods nowadays, and the array of neural, physiological, and behavioural responses linked to it, might be exacerbating our physiological hunger way too often. Such visual hunger is presumably also part of the reason why various food media have become increasingly successful in this, the digital age. Before discussing the potential role of visual hunger in public health, we take a brief look at the evidence suggesting that the exposure to appetizing images of food (the majority of which are presented digitally, and hence in a unisensory manner) is becoming an increasingly important source of enjoyment for many people in society today (e.g., see?Prince, 2014,?Spence, 2015, for a recent commentary). We then take a look at the evidence from the cognitive?neurosciences?highlighting the effect that viewing food images has on both the physiological and neural levels. ... While it might seem that the influence of this ‘digital grazing’ is gaining traction across a wide cross-section of the public, there is a very real concern that this onslaught of appetizing food images may be having a deleterious impact on certain of our eating behaviours (e.g., see?Ouwehand and Papies, 2010,?Robinson and Matheson, 2014).9 ... ?Indeed, cooking shows, food advertisement, and social media feeds containing images of high-energy foods may well offer a substitute source of pleasure, while at the same time indirectly promoting overconsumption and gratification. As?Passamonti and his colleagues (2009, p. 43)?note, “external food cues, such as the sight of appetizing food can evoke a desire to eat, even in the absence of hunger.” The real problem here is that such indulgence, by modelling how much and what type of food we end up eating, might actually be detrimental to both our psychological and physiological well-being. On the flip side, though, the hope amongst some researchers is that by gaining a better understanding of the neural underpinnings of our visually-elicited food behaviours, we may one day potentially be able to nudge consumers toward healthier eating (e.g.,?Toepel, Knebel, Hudry, le Coutre, & Murray, 2009).
author. innovator. advisor. speaker. columnist.
3 年This is awesome - and fully you:) Love your ending;)