Philosophy needed - more than ever
Photo: https://images.wisegeek.com/man-at-nail-salon-with-smile.jpg

Philosophy needed - more than ever

Today we need philosophy in social research more than ever.

First, people are so educated and knowledgeable that our world is already overloaded with knowledge. Enlightening is no more sufficient, people need to understand how they understand and learn to see void and exclusion in the middle of their Enlightenment.

Secondly, accumulated knowledge has not built a holistic understanding of reality but fed controversy between incompatible value systems (of universals) within which this knowledge emerges. These controversies reach beyond rationality of scientific horizon and require trans-disciplinary considerations, even trans-scientific considerations, such as in the case of Copenhagen consensus, in physics in 1920's when scientific controversies are overcome with evaluative interpretation.

Finally, philosophy is especially indispensable as a foundation for self-reflective science which must become deconstructively creative. Self-reflective science is creative not only in a superficial way (discovering new truths) but also in a deep way because it is able to question its own foundations and deconstructing void in own truth claims.

Source: Bojan Radej, Excerpt from a book Social Complexity and Complex Society, Forthcoming


要查看或添加评论,请登录

Bojan Radej的更多文章

  • How the excluded see the world that has excluded them

    How the excluded see the world that has excluded them

    Social inclusion can be examined either from the viewpoints of the included or the excluded. The mainstream view is…

  • Collective Rationality in Evaluation

    Collective Rationality in Evaluation

    Chapter III.2 from the new working paper of the Slovenian Association of Evaluators.

  • Eliminating bias in evaluation - or not?

    Eliminating bias in evaluation - or not?

    Chapter III.1 from the new working paper of the Slovenian Association of Evaluators.

  • Evaluative Interpretation Tools

    Evaluative Interpretation Tools

    Chapter II in “INCLUSIVE OR RATIONAL PARTICIPATORY EVALUATION?” Slovenian Evaluation Society’s Working Papers…

  • Inclusive or rational participatory evaluation?

    Inclusive or rational participatory evaluation?

    Part 1 (Introduction) The traditional result-based policy impact evaluation, which compares actual achievements with…

  • Kako v Sloveniji meriti u?inke predpisov?

    Kako v Sloveniji meriti u?inke predpisov?

    Ministrstvo za javno upravo je pripravilo Osnutek metodologije za oceno u?inkov predpisov, v zvezi s ?ir?imi…

  • Avtenti?na politi?na sredina je prazna in slepovidna

    Avtenti?na politi?na sredina je prazna in slepovidna

    Kot vse ka?e, bo tudi v leto?nji predvolilni kampanji med novonastalimi gibanji, zavezni?tvi, povezavami in koalicijami…

  • Messing up cybernetics, chaos, and complexity

    Messing up cybernetics, chaos, and complexity

    There is a very persistent view among followers of systems theory, arguing that systems can understand and resolve…

  • MEANINGLESS LANGUAGE

    MEANINGLESS LANGUAGE

    by Michael Stone, President, IFRC Alumni, the Hague (posted with permission) I am told I have fifteen minutes, then I…

    2 条评论
  • Middle beyond Meddle and Muddle

    Middle beyond Meddle and Muddle

    Benjamin P. Taylor shared his thoughts in a post recently about a situation well-known to everyone when asked to act as…

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了