Phased Approach | Generative AI - Thinking fast and Slow

Phased Approach | Generative AI - Thinking fast and Slow

OpenAI's GPT-o1 / Strawberry purposely thinks more slowly

Can you count the number of occurrences of the letter 'R' in strawberry? Of course you can, but you had to stop and think for a very brief moment. This has been a classically difficult question even for the most advanced generative AI models such as GPT 4o and even the ever amazing Claude Sonnet 3.5.

This is because language models typically work by breaking words out into tokens and predicting the next token and word. The very way they operate makes it difficult for the model to operate on a single word and answer what should be quite a logical question.



The new OpenAI model o1 is different. Its easy to see why the project in OpenAI was code-named Strawberry as it takes on these difficult tasks by taking longer to answer the question and reasons using among other things chain of thought reasoning. In fact in more complex questions it can take minutes to answer the question and will show you step by step what it is "thinking" in order to solve the problem.

Here is an example of a complex word problem the new model can solve.




This groundbreaking model is not just another incremental improvement in AI; it represents a fundamental shift in how machines approach problem-solving. Interestingly, this shift bears a striking resemblance to the dual-process theory of thinking proposed by Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman in his seminal work, "Thinking, Fast and Slow."


Kahneman's Two Systems of Thought

Before we dive into the intricacies of GPT-o1, let's briefly revisit Kahneman's theory. He proposed that human thinking operates in two distinct modes:

  1. System 1: Fast, intuitive, and automatic
  2. System 2: Slow, deliberate, and analytical

While previous AI models have excelled at rapid, intuitive responses (akin to System 1), GPT-o1 introduces a more deliberate, reasoning-focused approach that mirrors Kahneman's System 2 thinking.

GPT-o1: The Deliberate Thinker

GPT-o1 is designed to spend more time "thinking" before responding, using a complex reasoning process to tackle challenging problems. This approach marks a significant departure from previous models, which often prioritised speed and generalisation over deep, multi-step reasoning.

Key features of GPT-o1 include:

  1. Enhanced Reasoning Capabilities: GPT-o1 shows remarkable improvements in areas requiring complex reasoning, such as mathematics, coding, and scientific analysis.
  2. Chain-of-Thought Processing: The model employs a large-scale reinforcement learning algorithm that teaches it to use chain-of-thought reasoning, allowing it to break down complex problems into manageable steps.
  3. Improved Performance in Specialized Domains: In benchmark tests, GPT-o1 has shown performance comparable to PhD students on challenging tasks in physics, chemistry, and biology.
  4. Exceptional Mathematical Prowess: GPT-o1 scored an impressive 83% on a qualifying exam for the International Mathematics Olympiad, a significant leap from GPT-4's 13% score.
  5. Advanced Coding Skills: The model reached the 89th percentile in Codeforces coding competitions, demonstrating its capability in complex programming tasks.

The Trade-off: Speed vs. Depth

While GPT-o1's performance in complex reasoning tasks is impressive, it comes with trade-offs that echo the distinction between Kahneman's System 1 and System 2 thinking:

  1. Processing Time: GPT-o1 is significantly slower than its predecessors, taking about 30 times longer to generate responses. This mirrors the human experience of engaging in deep, analytical thinking.
  2. Resource Intensity: The model is more expensive to use than GPT-4, with higher token costs in the API. This reflects the increased computational resources required for its advanced reasoning capabilities.
  3. Specialization vs. Generalization: While GPT-o1 excels in complex domains, it may not outperform GPT-4 in more general or everyday tasks. This specialization is reminiscent of how humans often rely on System 1 for routine tasks and engage System 2 for more challenging problems.

Real-World Applications and Performance

The enhanced capabilities of GPT-o1 open up new possibilities in various fields:

  1. Scientific Research: Its ability to reason through complex scientific problems could accelerate research in fields like physics, chemistry, and biology.
  2. Advanced Mathematics: With its exceptional performance in mathematical reasoning, GPT-o1 could become a powerful tool for mathematicians and researchers.
  3. Software Development: Its high performance in coding competitions suggests it could be a valuable asset in complex software development projects.
  4. Business Analytics: In a customer support ticket classification task, GPT-o1 showed a 12% improvement in accuracy over GPT-4, indicating potential applications in business intelligence and data analysis.

The Future of AI Thinking

The development of GPT-o1 represents a significant step towards AI systems that can engage in more human-like reasoning. By incorporating both fast, intuitive responses and slower, more deliberate analysis, we're moving closer to AI that can flexibly adapt its thinking style to the task at hand.

However, it's important to note that GPT-o1 is still in its early stages. It currently lacks some features of GPT-4, such as web browsing and processing files/images. OpenAI plans to gradually expand access, with a smaller, more affordable version called o1-mini in the pipeline.

Bridging the Gap to Novel AI Reasoning

The introduction of GPT-o1 marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of artificial intelligence, one that brings us closer to a long-anticipated breakthrough: AI systems capable of generating novel ideas in science and research. By embodying aspects of both fast and slow thinking, as described in Kahneman's seminal work, GPT-o1 pushes the boundaries of what's possible in machine cognition.

  1. Closing the Gap to Scientific Innovation: The enhanced reasoning capabilities of GPT-o1 represent a significant step toward AI that can not only process existing information but also engage in the kind of deep, analytical reasoning that leads to new discoveries. This development could potentially revolutionise fields like drug discovery, theoretical physics, and complex systems analysis, where novel insights are crucial for progress.
  2. The Need for Adaptive AI Systems: As we move forward with models like GPT-o1, it's becoming clear that the future of AI lies in adaptive systems. We'll need to develop applications that can seamlessly switch between faster, more generalised models for routine tasks and slower, deep-thinking models like GPT-o1 for complex problems. Moreover, we may need to create meta-AI systems capable of evaluating the complexity of a given problem and deciding whether to engage in deeper, more time-consuming analysis – much like how humans instinctively gauge whether to rely on quick intuition or engage in more deliberate thought.

In essence, the story of GPT-o1 echoes Kahneman's insights about human cognition: true intelligence, whether artificial or human, requires a delicate balance between rapid, intuitive processing and slower, more deliberate analysis. We may be on the cusp of this new AI paradigm, we're not just witnessing a technological advancement; we're entering an era where machines might begin to replicate – and potentially enhance – the full spectrum of human cognitive abilities.

The challenges ahead are complex. How will we integrate these deeper-thinking AI models into our existing systems? How can we ensure that AI knows when to think fast and when to think slow? And perhaps most intriguingly, how might this development reshape our understanding of creativity and innovation in scientific research?

As we continue to explore and refine these technologies, one thing is clear: the way machines think is becoming more nuanced, more powerful, and more closely aligned with the complexities of human cognition than ever before. The future of AI is not just about faster processing or larger datasets; it's about creating systems that can truly think, reason, and potentially innovate in ways we're only beginning to imagine.

Francesco Mazzotta

Cloud Intelligence @ AWS | #cloud | #competitiveintelligence | #connectorofdots | #processmanagement | #projectmanagement | #contentstrategy #allthoughtsaremyown

3 周

Great parallel with Kahneman's theory. I'm wondering if we should reframe the terminology we use to describe what LLMs do, to stray away from anthropomorphizing their processes. Perhaps 'reasoning' or 'computational reasoning' would be more accurate? I've been in multiple conversations with AI beginners where the focus always converges on 'thinking,' and I find myself explaining that, at least for now, the technology doesn't think, though it may be perceived to. Thoughts?

要查看或添加评论,请登录