Phased Approach | Generative AI - Thinking fast and Slow
Richard Skinner
CEO @ PhasedAI | Helping Enterprise Transform Operations with Generative AI
OpenAI's GPT-o1 / Strawberry purposely thinks more slowly
Can you count the number of occurrences of the letter 'R' in strawberry? Of course you can, but you had to stop and think for a very brief moment. This has been a classically difficult question even for the most advanced generative AI models such as GPT 4o and even the ever amazing Claude Sonnet 3.5.
This is because language models typically work by breaking words out into tokens and predicting the next token and word. The very way they operate makes it difficult for the model to operate on a single word and answer what should be quite a logical question.
The new OpenAI model o1 is different. Its easy to see why the project in OpenAI was code-named Strawberry as it takes on these difficult tasks by taking longer to answer the question and reasons using among other things chain of thought reasoning. In fact in more complex questions it can take minutes to answer the question and will show you step by step what it is "thinking" in order to solve the problem.
Here is an example of a complex word problem the new model can solve.
This groundbreaking model is not just another incremental improvement in AI; it represents a fundamental shift in how machines approach problem-solving. Interestingly, this shift bears a striking resemblance to the dual-process theory of thinking proposed by Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman in his seminal work, "Thinking, Fast and Slow."
Kahneman's Two Systems of Thought
Before we dive into the intricacies of GPT-o1, let's briefly revisit Kahneman's theory. He proposed that human thinking operates in two distinct modes:
While previous AI models have excelled at rapid, intuitive responses (akin to System 1), GPT-o1 introduces a more deliberate, reasoning-focused approach that mirrors Kahneman's System 2 thinking.
GPT-o1: The Deliberate Thinker
GPT-o1 is designed to spend more time "thinking" before responding, using a complex reasoning process to tackle challenging problems. This approach marks a significant departure from previous models, which often prioritised speed and generalisation over deep, multi-step reasoning.
Key features of GPT-o1 include:
The Trade-off: Speed vs. Depth
While GPT-o1's performance in complex reasoning tasks is impressive, it comes with trade-offs that echo the distinction between Kahneman's System 1 and System 2 thinking:
Real-World Applications and Performance
The enhanced capabilities of GPT-o1 open up new possibilities in various fields:
The Future of AI Thinking
The development of GPT-o1 represents a significant step towards AI systems that can engage in more human-like reasoning. By incorporating both fast, intuitive responses and slower, more deliberate analysis, we're moving closer to AI that can flexibly adapt its thinking style to the task at hand.
However, it's important to note that GPT-o1 is still in its early stages. It currently lacks some features of GPT-4, such as web browsing and processing files/images. OpenAI plans to gradually expand access, with a smaller, more affordable version called o1-mini in the pipeline.
Bridging the Gap to Novel AI Reasoning
The introduction of GPT-o1 marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of artificial intelligence, one that brings us closer to a long-anticipated breakthrough: AI systems capable of generating novel ideas in science and research. By embodying aspects of both fast and slow thinking, as described in Kahneman's seminal work, GPT-o1 pushes the boundaries of what's possible in machine cognition.
In essence, the story of GPT-o1 echoes Kahneman's insights about human cognition: true intelligence, whether artificial or human, requires a delicate balance between rapid, intuitive processing and slower, more deliberate analysis. We may be on the cusp of this new AI paradigm, we're not just witnessing a technological advancement; we're entering an era where machines might begin to replicate – and potentially enhance – the full spectrum of human cognitive abilities.
The challenges ahead are complex. How will we integrate these deeper-thinking AI models into our existing systems? How can we ensure that AI knows when to think fast and when to think slow? And perhaps most intriguingly, how might this development reshape our understanding of creativity and innovation in scientific research?
As we continue to explore and refine these technologies, one thing is clear: the way machines think is becoming more nuanced, more powerful, and more closely aligned with the complexities of human cognition than ever before. The future of AI is not just about faster processing or larger datasets; it's about creating systems that can truly think, reason, and potentially innovate in ways we're only beginning to imagine.
Cloud Intelligence @ AWS | #cloud | #competitiveintelligence | #connectorofdots | #processmanagement | #projectmanagement | #contentstrategy #allthoughtsaremyown
3 周Great parallel with Kahneman's theory. I'm wondering if we should reframe the terminology we use to describe what LLMs do, to stray away from anthropomorphizing their processes. Perhaps 'reasoning' or 'computational reasoning' would be more accurate? I've been in multiple conversations with AI beginners where the focus always converges on 'thinking,' and I find myself explaining that, at least for now, the technology doesn't think, though it may be perceived to. Thoughts?