PFAS (Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances) Data Availability
PFAS (Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances) Data Availability
Concern over the presence of per- and polyfluorinated substances, more commonly known as PFAS, in our drinking water is growing. These substances, which include PFOA, PFOS, GenX, and more, do not break down for decades and have been linked to kidney and testicular cancer, high cholesterol, low fertility, thyroid issues, and a decrease in the effectiveness of vaccines in children. (Source Source)
On June 23, 2023, chemical giant 3M Co. announced that it would settle a collection of lawsuits over its role in contaminating U.S. drinking water with PFAS. The magnitude of the settlement, at least $10.3 billion to around 300 communities in the United States, demonstrates how seriously communities and regulators are taking the harmful effect of PFAS in drinking water. (Source)
We still do not have a reliable method of removing PFAS from our drinking water. This means that our priority must be to limit the emissions of PFAS
The current state of PFAS point-source pollution monitoring
In the United States, point-source water pollution (pollution from a fixed source that does not move) is managed by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) as defined by the 1972 Clean Water Act (CWA). The NPDES is a system that issues permits to facilities that discharge wastewater into the waters of the United States. These permits set pollution limits for effluent discharge from the facilities. The majority of states manage their own NPDES programs
Discharge limits are set based on state-level regulations which set acceptable limits for pollution
The majority of states manage their own NPDES programs. The exceptions are Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, District of Columbia. (Source?Source?Source)
The table in Fig 1 shows the patchwork level of the allowable PFAS level in drinking water by state. The map in Fig 2 shows the number of facilities with PFAS data in the NPDES data in 2023.
领英推荐
Why would there be NPDES data from a state which doesn’t regulate PFAS in drinking water?
This is usually due to the relationship between state governments and tribal governments. If a facility discharges effluent into tribal waters, the NPDES is managed by the federal government. For instance, Idaho does not regulate PFAS in drinking water. However,?this?facility in Idaho has a NPDES permit managed by the federal EPA, because it discharges into Nez Perce tribal waters.
Why would there be states with PFAS limits for drinking water with no NPDES data?
This is due to the fact that regulations come into effect slowly, and that NPDES permits are valid for five years. (Source?Source)
Future availability of PFAS data
The EPA has proposed a nationwide regulation
Want to explore facilities’ discharges of PFAS and other pollutants? Reach out to the Citylitics team!
Finance & Operations at Citylitics
1 年Really interesting and nuanced. Thank you for this explanation Madeline Schatzberg, well-written!