Perspectives of Climate Justice in Adaptation Programs

Orlando?Coronado Fernández?

[email protected]?

I must emphasize that this is a controversial topic, and the views presented in this essay are for academic purposes only. I try to understand the subject by laying down the more relevant argument for and against climate justice?in adaptation programs, which is a perspective that challenges the current discourse surrounding climate change and adaptation. However, it is crucial to consider this perspective to ensure a well-rounded and comprehensive understanding of the topic.?

Before starting with my argument I want to clarify a key concept related to climate change, extreme climate events and climate justice, “event attribution”, which is a field of research that attempts to identify the role of climate change in extreme weather events. This approach involves analyzing the likelihood and severity of specific weather events, such as heatwaves, droughts, or floods, in a world with and without human-induced climate change. The goal is to estimate the extent to which climate change has increased the risk or magnitude of a particular event. Recent studies have demonstrated that climate change has already influenced a range of extreme weather events, including heatwaves, heavy precipitation, and hurricanes. For instance, a study by?Marvel et al., (2019) found that climate change had increased the likelihood of the record-breaking temperatures observed during the 2018 northern hemisphere summer by a factor of at least five. Similarly, studies have linked climate change to the increased frequency and severity of hurricanes (Knutson et al., 2015) and flooding (Risser & Wehner, 2017).

The implications of event attribution research extend beyond the scientific community, as they have important implications for climate justice. By attributing extreme weather events to climate change, event attribution research can help to highlight the disproportionate impacts of climate change on marginalized groups and underscore the need for climate action and adaptation measures that prioritize these communities (Bulkeley & Castán Broto, 2013).

Although event attribution research is a valuable tool for assessing the influence of climate change on extreme weather events, it is important to recognize and avoid false assumptions that can arise in this field.?

? One common false assumption is that extreme events can be attributed to climate change with absolute certainty (Herring et al., 2018). While event attribution research can provide important insights into the role of climate change in specific events, it cannot definitively prove causality (Easterling et al., 2016).

? Another false assumption is that event attribution research can provide deterministic predictions of future extreme events. However, the probabilistic nature of event attribution means that it can only provide estimates of the likelihood and severity of events under different climate scenarios(Stott et al., 2016). In addition, event attribution research is limited by the availability and quality of observational data and climate models, which can introduce uncertainties in the results (Herring et al., 2018).

Event attribution analysis may inadvertently reinforce the perception that extreme weather events are "natural disasters" beyond human control. However, this overlooks the fact that many extreme events are influenced by human activities, such as urbanization and land use change, which can exacerbate their impacts and increase their severity.

To avoid false assumptions, it is crucial to recognize the inherent complexity and uncertainties involved in event attribution research. Science and mathematical models have inherent limitations in accurately describing reality, which stresses the importance of communicating the uncertainties and limitations of event attribution research clearly. Moreover, it is vital to acknowledge the broader societal factors that contribute to extreme weather events. Therefore, caution is required when interpreting event attribution research to avoid oversimplification and false conclusions.

Climate Justice and Adaptation Programs

The concept of “Climate Justice” assumes that vulnerable communities are disproportionately affected by climate change, and adaptation programs must prioritize these communities' needs to ensure fairness and equity. However, this perspective may oversimplify the complex dynamics of climate change and adaptation. Vulnerability is not static and varies over time and space. Vulnerability is also influenced by many factors, including social, economic, and political factors, which cannot be addressed solely through adaptation programs (Adams & Luchsinger, 2009).

In recent years climate change has been perceived as a global crisis that poses an existential threat to humanity, especially to those who are most vulnerable and marginalized. Adaptation programs are essential in mitigating the impacts of climate change, particularly in developing countries. However, climate justice must be at the forefront of these programs to ensure that they do not exacerbate existing inequalities and injustices. Prioritizing vulnerable communities in adaptation programs may create unintended consequences, such as neglecting other communities' needs or creating dependencies on external assistance. As many authors such as Eriksen et al., (2021) and O’Brien & Leichenko (2000) have noted, "focusing on vulnerability reduction without addressing the underlying drivers of vulnerability can lead to ineffective and inefficient adaptation strategies."

Climate justice refers to the equitable distribution of the costs and benefits of climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts. It is a concept that recognizes the unequal burden of climate change impacts on marginalized communities, such as women, indigenous people, and low-income groups, who often have limited access to resources and are more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Climate justice also recognizes the historical responsibility of developed countries for greenhouse gas emissions and the need for them to provide support to developing countries in their efforts to adapt to climate change.?

Moreover, it is important to recognize that climate justice is not just about addressing the impacts of climate change but also about addressing the root causes of climate change. As the (United Nations Development Programme., 2007) notes, "Climate change is not just an environmental issue, but also a social and economic one, affecting the most vulnerable people and threatening to undermine human development." Nevertheless, there is a broader discussion in the literature on the relationship between climate justice and the root causes of climate change. Authors like Chauhan, (2019), Onifade, (2021) (Roser Dominic & Seidel Christian, (2017) and others,?have pointed out that the concept of climate justice may divert attention from the root causes of climate change, such as global emissions, and promote the idea that adaptation is the only solution to climate change. This view neglects the importance of mitigation efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are critical to preventing future climate change impacts.

Adaptation programs are crucial in reducing the vulnerability of communities to climate change impacts such as extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and drought. However, there is a risk that these programs can inadvertently exacerbate existing inequalities and injustices. For example, in some cases, adaptation programs may prioritize the needs of wealthy communities, leaving poorer communities behind. Additionally, adaptation programs that focus on technological solutions may overlook the importance of traditional knowledge and practices that have enabled communities to adapt to changing environmental conditions for centuries.

To ensure that adaptation programs are just and equitable, they must be designed with the full participation and involvement of affected communities. This approach is commonly known as community-based adaptation (CBA). CBA involves working with communities to identify their vulnerabilities, build their capacity to adapt and develop solutions that are grounded in their local knowledge and practices. This approach recognizes the importance of local knowledge, as well as the agency and resilience of communities in adapting to changing environmental conditions.

The adaptation justice Index provides a unique methodology for the integration of climate justice in planning for adaptation. By evaluating the adaptation initiatives on the basis of a set of predefined standards, this index can identify opportunities to improve fairness of programs and their impartiality (Juhola et al., 2022)

Furthermore, climate justice requires that adaptation programs address underlying structural inequalities and injustices. This includes addressing the root causes of poverty, social exclusion, and discrimination that make certain communities more vulnerable to climate change impacts. For example, gender-sensitive adaptation programs can empower women, who are often disproportionately affected by climate change, to participate in decision-making processes and access resources and opportunities to build their resilience to climate change impacts.

Reasons to act?

There are several reasons why it is both our duty to help and in our own self-interest to assist poor and vulnerable communities.?

? First and foremost, it is a moral imperative to help those who are in need and who may not have the resources or capacity to help themselves (World Bank, 2019). This is particularly important given that poverty and vulnerability often intersect with other forms of inequality, such as gender, race, and ethnicity (United Nations Development Programme, 2020).

? However, Assisting poor and vulnerable communities is not only a moral obligation but also in our own interest due to practical reasons. Poverty and inequality can have negative spillover effects on society, such as reduced economic growth, increased crime rates, and poorer health outcomes. Therefore, poverty reduction is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic imperative. Poverty and inequality can have negative spillover effects on society as a whole. On the other hand, poverty reduction can lead to potential benefits such as increased productivity, greater social cohesion, and reduced conflict. Thus, reducing poverty and inequality is not only a matter of fairness but also an economic imperative that can benefit all members of society (Toye, 2007) (The World Bank, 2015). By reducing poverty and vulnerability, we can help to create a more stable, prosperous, and equitable society for everyone.

Furthermore, global challenges such as climate change, conflict, and pandemics often disproportionately affect poor and vulnerable communities (United Nations Development Programme, 2020). By helping to build resilience and strengthen these communities, we can also contribute to global efforts to address these challenges.

In short, helping poor and vulnerable communities is both a moral obligation and a practical necessity for creating a more just and sustainable world.

Conclusion?

It is essential to acknowledge that natural disasters, such as flooding, can result from a combination of factors beyond climate change. While rainfall and land use play significant roles in determining the extent of flooding and damage, poverty is another crucial issue that impacts disaster impact.?

? Disasters tend to disproportionately affect low-income communities, as these areas often lack resources and infrastructure to adequately prepare for or respond to emergencies.?

? Poor infrastructure, including poorly constructed housing, inadequate drainage systems and building houses near or on the way of rivers, can exacerbate the impact of flooding and other disasters.

In addition, there is a complex relationship between climate change, natural disasters, and other environmental factors such as vegetation and air pollution (Anderson & Bausch, 2006), adding to the complexity of the connection between climate change and natural disasters. As an example: climate change impacts vegetation and increases susceptibility to wildfires, but other factors such as temperature, previous fires, and location of residential properties contribute significantly to wildfire severity and extent of damage. Western US wildfires have increased in frequency and severity due to climate change, but land use change and fire suppression policies also increase wildfire risk. Comprehensive wildfire management should consider multiple factors, including climate change, human behavior, land use change, and fire suppression policies. Addressing all these factors can help mitigate the risk of wildfires and reduce the extent of damage they cause (Abatzoglou & Williams, 2016; Moritz et al., 2014).

Climate justice must be at the forefront of adaptation programs to ensure that they are just and equitable.?

? This involves designing programs that are grounded in local knowledge and practices that prioritize the needs of marginalized communities, and that address underlying structural inequalities and injustices.?

? Community-based adaptation provides a framework for achieving these objectives, recognizing the agency and resilience of communities in adapting to changing environmental conditions.?

? As we continue to confront the challenges of climate change, it is essential that we do so with justice and equity as our guiding principles.?

? It is essential to recognize and address the impact of poverty and social inequality on disaster preparedness and response. By enhancing the living conditions and resources available to low-income communities, we can mitigate the effects of natural disasters and ensure that everyone, regardless of socioeconomic status, has access to the necessary support and resources for recovery and rebuilding.?

? A comprehensive approach to disaster preparedness and response that prioritizes addressing poverty and social inequality will help build a more resilient and equitable society.

Opposing climate justice in adaptation programs challenges the current discourse surrounding climate change and adaptation. It is essential to consider this perspective to ensure a well-rounded and comprehensive understanding of the topic. While the concept of climate justice may seem straightforward, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and unintended consequences.

References?

Abatzoglou, J. T., & Williams, A. P. (2016). Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(42), 11770–11775. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1607171113/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.1607171113.SD03.CSV

Adams, B., & Luchsinger, G. (2009). Climate Justice for a Changing Planet: A Primer for Policy Makers and NGOs. www.un-ngls.org

Anderson, J., & Bausch, C. (2006). Policy Brief for the EP Environment Committee IP/A/ENVI/FWC/2005-35 Climate change and natural disasters: Scientific evidence of a possible relation between recent natural disasters and climate change.

Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-5661.2012.00535.X

Chauhan, R. (2019). CLIMATE CHANGE: AN ISSUE OF EQUITY, JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS. ILI Law Review. https://hdr.undp.org/en/media/

Easterling, D. R., Kunkel, K. E., Wehner, M. F., & Sun, L. (2016). Detection and attribution of climate extremes in the observed record. Weather and Climate Extremes, 11, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WACE.2016.01.001

The World Bank. (2015). Ending Poverty and Sharing Prosperity.

Eriksen, S., Schipper, E. L. F., Scoville-Simonds, M., Vincent, K., Adam, H. N., Brooks, N., Harding, B., Khatri, D., Lenaerts, L., Liverman, D., Mills-Novoa, M., Mosberg, M., Movik, S., Muok, B., Nightingale, A., Ojha, H., Sygna, L., Taylor, M., Vogel, C., & West, J. J. (2021). Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance? World Development, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2020.105383

Herring, S. C., Christidis, N., Hoell, A., Kossin, J. P., Schreck, C. J., & Stott, P. A. (2018). Explaining Extreme Events of 2016 from a Climate Perspective. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 99(1), S1–S157. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-EXPLAININGEXTREMEEVENTS2016.1

Juhola, S., Heikkinen, M., Pietil?, T., Groundstroem, F., & K?yhk?, J. (2022). Connecting climate justice and adaptation planning: An adaptation justice index. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2022.07.024

Knutson, T. R., Sirutis, J. J., Zhao, M., Tuleya, R. E., Bender, M., Vecchi, G. A., Villarini, G., & Chavas, D. (2015). Global projections of intense tropical cyclone activity for the late twenty-first century from dynamical downscaling of CMIP5/RCP4.5 scenarios. Journal of Climate, 28(18), 7203–7224. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0129.1

Marvel, K., Cook, B. I., Bonfils, C. J. W., Durack, P. J., Smerdon, J. E., & Williams, A. P. (2019). Twentieth-century hydroclimate changes consistent with human influence. Nature, 569(7754), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41586-019-1149-8

Moritz, M. A., Batllori, E., Bradstock, R. A., Gill, A. M., Handmer, J., Hessburg, P. F., Leonard, J., McCaffrey, S., Odion, D. C., Schoennagel, T., & Syphard, A. D. (2014). Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature, 515(7525), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/NATURE13946

O’Brien, K. L., & Leichenko, R. M. (2000). Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2

Onifade, T. T. (2021). Climate Justice Under the Paris Agreement: Framework and Substance. Carbon and Climate Law Review, 15(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.21552/CCLR/2021/3/6

Risser, M. D., & Wehner, M. F. (2017). Attributable Human-Induced Changes in the Likelihood and Magnitude of the Observed Extreme Precipitation during Hurricane Harvey. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(24), 12,457-12,464. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075888

Roser Dominic, & Seidel Christian. (2017). Climate Justice: Christian Seidel, Dominic Roser - Book2look. https://www.book2look.com/embed/9781317209539

Sheldon, T. (n.d.). Four Case Studies and Synthesis Analysis Early Lessons from Large-Scale Implementations of the Graduation Approach.

Stott, P. A., Christidis, N., Otto, F. E. L., Sun, Y., Vanderlinden, J. P., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Vautard, R., von Storch, H., Walton, P., Yiou, P., & Zwiers, F. W. (2016). Attribution of extreme weather and climate-related events. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/WCC.380

Toye, J. (2007). Poverty Reduction. Source: Development in Practice, 17(4), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469427

United Nations Development Programme. (2007). Human development report 2007/2008: fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world. United Nations Development Programme.

United Nations Development Programme. (2020). The next frontier Human development and the Anthropocene Human Development Report 2020. https://hdr.undp.org.

Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts, 7, 65–92.