Personality Tests: Friend or Foe?

In today's dynamic job market, the utilization of personality tests within the hiring process has gained significant traction. For nonprofit organizations seeking to build cohesive teams and identify the best leadership candidates, personality assessments can offer valuable insights. However, it’s important to remember that these should be just one component of a broad and balanced recruiting process. This week, we delve into the pros and cons of incorporating personality profile tests into your nonprofit leadership recruitment process so that you can use them appropriately to make great hiring decisions.

?

The Benefits of Incorporating Personality Tests

·????? Cultivating Cohesive Teams: When skillfully integrated, personality tests can act as a tool to assemble well-balanced and harmonious teams. By identifying individual strengths and weaknesses, these tests empower recruiters to strategically construct teams that complement one another. Diversity in personality traits fosters collaboration, minimizes friction, and propels productivity.

·????? Enhancing Interviews: Pairing personality tests with effective interviews amplifies your understanding of candidates' capabilities. For example, a candidate with high empathy scores might excel in roles involving customer service. Integrating these insights into interviews allows for targeted questioning, yielding a comprehensive evaluation of candidates' potential fit.

·????? Identifying Focus Areas for the Interview: Crafting tailored interview questions becomes more seamless with personality assessments. By leveraging the results, you can pose inquiries that delve into a candidate's preferred work style or their compatibility with teamwork. For example – if a candidate’s test shows they prefer to work in a team and within an established system, you can ask questions about projects they have worked on independently and how they organized them to stay on task.

·????? Work Environment Suitability: Personality tests unveil a candidate's compatibility with varying work environments. For instance, an assessment may show if the candidate works best with a rapidly-changing work environment with one-day deadlines, or instead if they prefer environments where the work is steady and predictable.

·????? Strategic Management: A candidate's personality profile can hint at their management preferences and responsiveness to different management styles. Do they prefer more guidance and a hands-on management approach, or are they more effective when given some independence? This early understanding facilitates decisions regarding team structures and leadership roles, contributing to long-term success.

?

The Drawbacks of Using Personality Tests

·????? Exclusion of Qualified Candidates: Over-reliance on personality tests can inadvertently exclude qualified candidates whose profiles deviate from the norm. This can stifle creativity and innovation, as “out of the box” thinkers are often underrepresented in standardized personality assessments.

?·????? Potential for Inaccurate Results: Candidates might tailor their responses to match perceived employer preferences, leading to skewed outcomes. These results may not accurately reflect their genuine personality traits, undermining the validity of the assessment.?

·????? Misalignment with Purpose: Many popular tests were designed for purposes other than hiring. For example, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was created for career training and development. Using these tests in the recruitment process may yield misleading results, as these tests weren't initially intended for this context.

·????? Legal and Ethical Concerns: Making hiring decisions or cutting candidates based on personality tests can expose organizations to legal risks, particularly in regard to potential discrimination. Some individuals have successfully sued employers on the grounds that their test discriminated against individuals with mental illnesses and violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

·????? Emotional State Variation: Test takers' emotional states during the assessment may not mirror their states in a workplace setting. This disconnect can lead to misleading results, prompting the exclusion of deserving candidates or the selection of ill-suited individuals. In many cases, a person will have a different result when taking the test in a different environment or even just a few months later.

·????? Biased Decision-Making: Hiring teams will often notice that one personality type performs well in the organization and choose to focus their energy on hiring a similar personality type. This will create, whether knowingly or unknowingly, a biased process that favors hiring people similar to yourself or the current team. Diversity is one of the best ways to inspire team productivity, and bias will often lead to the wrong hire.

Personality Tests You Can Explore : Gallup Clifton Strengths, Myers Briggs Type, DISC, Oceans Test, Personality Plus

Conclusion: A Balanced Approach to Personality Tests

Assessments offer insights that can significantly enrich your leadership recruitment process, but they should not be the sole determinant. Use them to enhance your understanding of candidates, fine-tune interviews, and facilitate better team dynamics. However, always prioritize diversity, inclusion, and compliance with legal and ethical standards. By striking a harmonious balance, you'll forge a path toward assembling exceptional nonprofit leadership teams poised for success.

?

About Us

If you want to discuss strategies for attracting top-tier remote talent for leadership positions, please reach out to me at?[email protected]. ?We will schedule a no-cost, no obligation 30-minute consultation to discuss how to meet your goals.

?

Maneva Group is a?woman and minority owned?national?Executive Search firm focusing on the social sector?with expertise in completely managing the recruiting process, curating diverse and exceptionally qualified candidate pools,?and advising C-suite executives and board members through crucial hiring decisions.??