Personal mobility is not what it used to be...
Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, circa 1920

Personal mobility is not what it used to be...

Another one from the vault. Personal mobility is a derived demand, derived from a more fundamental demand for “access”, access to products and services, access to gainful employment, access to cultural and educational enrichment, access to recreational and leisure experiences. The market is for access, not mobility, and the distinction is a critical one. There are instructive parallels between the access vs. mobility issue in transportation planning and the conservation vs. energy growth debate of the 1970's. I wrote this article in 1996, but conversations at recent conferences have suggested it might still have some mileage all these years later.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ralph Torrie的更多文章

  • When is a home not a house?

    When is a home not a house?

    I was reading a new report from a leading climate NGO in Canada this morning on residential buildings and climate…

    5 条评论
  • "Nature is an independent power." -- Ursula Franklin

    "Nature is an independent power." -- Ursula Franklin

    In the wake of the desperate message in this week's IPCC report, I found myself recalling a talk the great Ursula…

    1 条评论
  • Looking back at looking ahead...

    Looking back at looking ahead...

    Back in 1996, in the days when conferences had physical locations and the global wind power capacity was 6 GW (it is…

    3 条评论
  • EfficiencyOne White Paper outlines pathways to a net-zero future

    EfficiencyOne White Paper outlines pathways to a net-zero future

    September 23, 2021 – Halifax/Kjipuktuk,NS—Nova Scotia needs to invest in energy efficiency, electrification, and…

    1 条评论
  • Eisenhower, the Climate Crisis and Building Retrofits

    Eisenhower, the Climate Crisis and Building Retrofits

    General Dwight Eisenhower, who planned the Allied landings in Normandy that turned the tide in the war in Europe is…

    4 条评论
  • Reinventing Fire, Reinventing Hope

    Reinventing Fire, Reinventing Hope

    Notes for a talk by Ralph Torrie to the Greenwood Coalition, February 2014 DAVID ASKED ME TO PREPARE MY REMARKS THIS…

    1 条评论
  • Why $307.58?

    Why $307.58?

    Ralph Torrie, September, 2020. Every $20 of federal government investment in this future would be matched by $125 in…

    5 条评论
  • Sufficiency and decarbonization -- how much is enough?

    Sufficiency and decarbonization -- how much is enough?

    How much is enough for a good life without undermining the possibilities for others to live a good life? The search for…

    3 条评论
  • This is what an emergency response looks like.

    This is what an emergency response looks like.

    A report prepared for the Ecology Action Centre in Halifax and released today describes a scenario for an accelerated…

    10 条评论
  • You are paying over $200/kWh for some of your electricity. Yes, you.

    You are paying over $200/kWh for some of your electricity. Yes, you.

    But you don’t care, and you shouldn’t. Take the humble 1.

    7 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了