Permissive Placarding?
https://shop.advanceautoparts.com/p/diehard-red-battery-24f-group-size-550-cca-685-ca-85-minute-reserve-capacity-reliable-starting-power-24f-2/2070073

Permissive Placarding?

I decided to make this an article, instead of a post. I think I'll need more space than LinkedIn allows for a post.

I received a call today regarding batteries in an intermodal container and the driver said the bill of lading indicated it was non-hazmat. The driver said he applied placards, I didn't bother to ask if he added Class 8 placards; however, I did mention it would be considered "permissive placarding."

I have to wonder when was the last time the carrier provided hazmat training required initially and every three years? I believe too many carriers and drivers associate hazmat with only placards and that's unfortunate as hazmat training kicks in anytime hazmat is transported. For years I tried to convince underwriters they were overlooking hazmat transportation and exposing themselves to hazmat issues.

Proper Shipping Name (PSN) and exception 173.154

§ 173.154 Exceptions for Class 8 (corrosive materials).

A limited quantity package that conforms to the provisions of this section is not subject to the shipping paper requirements of subpart C of part 172 of this subchapter, unless the material meets the definition of a hazardous substance, hazardous waste, marine pollutant, or is offered for transportation and transported by aircraft or vessel, and is eligible for the exceptions provided in § 173.156 of this part. In addition, shipments of limited quantities are not subject to subpart F (Placarding) of part 172 of this subchapter. Each package must conform to the packaging requirements of subpart B of this part and may not exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight. Except for transportation by aircraft, the following combination packagings are authorized:

eCFR :: 49 CFR 173.154 -- Exceptions for Class 8 (corrosive materials).

The US HMR only applies to domestic transportation, the driver stated he was pulling containers out of the port in New York. I know the IMDG isn't as generous.

§ 172.502 Prohibited and permissive placarding.

(c) Permissive placarding. Placards may be displayed for a hazardous material, even when not required, if the placarding otherwise conforms to the requirements of this subpart.

eCFR :: 49 CFR 172.502 -- Prohibited and permissive placarding.

I see many carriers with $750,000 of insurance on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 's L & I website. I know that insurance agents give clients a hard time and will not show $1,000,000 of insurance on file if the carrier doesn't identify as a hazmat carrier. The problem is many carriers aren't aware they a hazmat carrier:

Oil listed in 49 CFR 172.101; hazardous waste, hazardous materials, or hazardous substances defined in 49 CFR 171.8 and listed in 49 CFR 172.101, but not mentioned in entry (2) or (4) of this table = $1,000,000

eCFR :: 49 CFR 387.9 -- Financial responsibility, minimum levels.

There are many items listed in § 172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous materials table that carriers/underwriters/drivers don't even think of as hazmat:

  • Anti-freeze, liquid, see Flammable liquids, n.o.s.
  • Ammunition, sporting, see Cartridges for weapons, etc. (UN 0012; UN 0328; UN 0339)
  • Alcoholic beverages
  • Alcohols, n.o.s. = A.K.A. Rubbing alcohol
  • Charcoal briquettes, shell, screenings, wood, etc. = Excepted from HMR in bags of 66 pounds or less
  • Aerosols, flammable, (each not exceeding 1 L capacity) = Pam cooking spray, spray paint, etc.
  • Aerosols, non-flammable, (each not exceeding 1 L capacity) = Deodorant, bug spray, etc.

Just a small sample of hazmat carriers carry daily and don't consider the freight as hazmat.

§ 172.704 Training requirements.

(a) Hazmat employee training must include the following:

eCFR :: 49 CFR 172.704 -- Training requirements.

§ 177.800 Purpose and scope of this part and responsibility for compliance and training.

(c) Responsibility for training. A carrier may not transport a hazardous material by motor vehicle unless each of its hazmat employees involved in that transportation is trained as required by this part and subpart H of part 172 of this subchapter.

eCFR :: 49 CFR 177.800 -- Purpose and scope of this part and responsibility for compliance and training.

Appendix B to Part 385—Explanation of Safety Rating Process

§ 177.800(c) Failing to instruct a category of employees in hazardous materials regulations (critical).

eCFR :: Appendix B to Part 385, Title 49 -- Explanation of Safety Rating Process

About 2000 I did a compliance review at an intermodal carrier that insisted they didn't transport hazmat. I was working with two other new Safety Investigators as we were past the phase of working with a coach and working together to make sure we covered the bases and could lean on each other for questions. I asked the carrier for their bills of lading (BOL) for the last few months and combed through them looking for hazmat. I didn't find any, so moved on. I asked for the BOL for a shipment we were documenting for hours of service, the carrier handed me a hazmat shipping paper. Ah, no real surprises I guess I didn't go far enough back.

So to wrap this up? I strongly encourage all carriers to do hazmat training. Better safe than sorry.

Happy Hump Day!

Be safe..

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Michael Millard CDS的更多文章

  • Entrapment?

    Entrapment?

    I have issues with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration guidance to drivers and students regarding…

  • PPP = Poor Prior Planning

    PPP = Poor Prior Planning

    I am not a fan of exemptions, I believe that if it's good for one? It's good for all. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety…

    3 条评论
  • Hazardous Materials and Department of Homeland Security

    Hazardous Materials and Department of Homeland Security

    I have worked hazardous materials off and on since 1976 when I enlisted in the Army as a 76W Petroleum Supply…

  • Misconceptions about Personal Conveyance and the FMCSR..

    Misconceptions about Personal Conveyance and the FMCSR..

    I suspect that I dive pretty deep into the FMCSR and am good at connecting the dots. I get annoyed when people say;…

    5 条评论
  • Square Peg in a Round Hole

    Square Peg in a Round Hole

    It's interesting when flashbacks occur, I miss my adventures from my earlier years and suspect that my relationships…

  • PSP and the FMCSA

    PSP and the FMCSA

    I suppose I shouldn't be surprised; however, I am disappointed in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in…

  • Driver Qualification an Uphill Battle

    Driver Qualification an Uphill Battle

    Following yesterday's call with the FMCSA on its Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) I did some digging and am…

  • The FMCSA and CA/WA Meal Breaks

    The FMCSA and CA/WA Meal Breaks

    Recently there was a post by Brendon Wiseman beating up on the FMCSA for issues related to the CA/WA meal break…

  • The ICC and Today's FMCSA

    The ICC and Today's FMCSA

    Gord Magill trucking was never deregulated. The HOS have existed since 1938 when the ICC's power was expanded to…

    2 条评论
  • Assets vs workload

    Assets vs workload

    Stanley Ray Hampton, I've been around trucking for a long time. First time I've heard "IFC," I used Google to no avail.

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了