Performance Review Musings
For most professionals, this is the time of the year when they receive career-defining feedback to set the tone, expectations, and goals for the following year.
In my career, I have received good and not-so-good performance reviews. However, over the years, I have experienced and heard of some that suggest performance reviews are unnecessarily ineffective if not broken in some cases.
Why is something intended to improve a person’s professional results, at times, so impersonal, linear, or ominous? I don’t necessarily have any of the answers for sure. But over the years, I have made some observations that I want you to consider and, thus, inspire you to think about how you manage and deliver meaningful performance reviews.?
First, they are usually always annual.?This has never made sense to me. Consider professional athletes for a moment. Even average athletes are in a constant state of being coached. And the elites ones even more. Can you imagine a defensive line coach in the NFL only providing feedback and coaching once a year? It would never happen because their athletes are out on the field and engaged in a mission-critical endeavor, performance, or goal.?So, why do professional managers try to manage performance once a year? I think it’s crazy. By them being annual, problems fester. I love this analogy and use it often: Yearly performance reviews allow a root canal to develop versus prevention with regular flossing.?
Secondly, performance reviews usually focus on a person’s weaknesses.?You know the ones, right? “You have to get better at this” or “you have to get better at that.” While improvement is always valid, focusing on a person’s weaknesses in a performance review sets an unnecessarily negative tone.?
I was coaching someone whose boss said he could be one of their best client-facing guys last month. He is brilliant, articulate, and does well under pressure. But his performance review was focused and framed around his gaps versus his potential. Instead, why not develop a plan to coach him to be the best client-facing guy in the company??Focusing on a person’s weaknesses diverts attention back to the gap instead of the potential. And we all know that usually produces the wrong mindset and focus. Again, why not draw the professional’s attention to places where they have a natural, intuitive strength to develop, thus making them skilled players using extraordinary power? Too much focus on weaknesses in a performance review makes it a miserable, anxiety-ridden process.
领英推荐
Third, performance reviews often include a pile of ambiguous language.?Ugh! I help clients learn to provide clearer and more concise feedback to their teams. In the process, I usually hear them use vague feedback to describe someone on their team. For example, “she is “hyper-passive” or something like that. When someone receives ambiguous feedback, they usually divert and focus their energy on responding. It’s too much work and completely avoidable. Someone could be hyper-passive in every single environment where assertiveness makes them more successful in only a tiny % of their overall job responsibilities. Being “hyper-passive” is only really causing an issue in two or three specific areas.?
Some other examples are like, “you’re too aggressive, you’re too assertive, you’re too passive” Well, if you say you’re too passive, people don’t know where and when to apply that. As a result, they might think or invent, “I have to walk into every meeting and loudly voice my point of view.” And so, they need help understanding how to interpret and apply the feedback in the future. Considering the desired future state or direction we are trying to coach people toward usually requires more defined language.?
Finally, performance reviews are typically one-directional.?When a boss gives feedback to a team member, they may miss out on mutually beneficial relational growth. Does it make sense for a couple to attend therapy, and one of them say, “only give feedback to me?” Of course not. And while the boss/employee relationship isn’t a traditional marriage, one-directional feedback rarely serves both people in any relationship. In the world of performance reviews, there should be a door open to giving feedback in both directions.?
Ultimately, these are my observations of a process intended to encourage, inspire, and drive professionals to exceed. Nevertheless, performance reviews sometimes are ineffective and don’t have to be. And while every leader and business culture is slightly different, we can learn from our own observations and feedback from trusted peers and partners.?
So, What do you think? What are your observations and experiences with performance reviews?
The?Whipp ?is a variety of things — it's the whipped cream on top of your hot chocolate. It's that delicious layer of foam on top of your latte. It’s also my Wednesday newsletter, where I'll share wisdom, humour, and insights for professional peeps. So, get a little something extra to help you put wisdom into professional practice.
Top Community Voice |Laughter Coach | Mentor NTU| Number 1 Favikon Influencer~ Fitness & Personal Growth!!
2 年??????
Learn the Science of Improvement - Lead the Transformation
2 年Thank You Christine, performance reviews cannot be improved, they should be abolished. Leaders and managers need to engage their team members with open ended questions to help each person on their team improve the system performance. Asking for the person’s feedback first opens the door to understanding. We need to understand the person and the impact of the system created by management on the person. Sharing our feedback every time we can talk about the event at hand makes improved performance happen faster than waiting for some longer interval. Feedback needs to go in both directions to improve the performance of the person and the manager in the system that they both work in.
Leadership Coach ? Consultant @Dale Carnegie Australia ? Founder @Feminine Leadership Co ? TEDx Speaker ? D&I Advocate ? Passionate about championing women to the highest levels of leadership in biz & corporate arenas
2 年Beautiful authentic share! Thank you for your openness Christine Laperriere
Leadership Coach for Women Sales and Revenue Leaders
2 年Spot on, Christine. Most managers are very uncomfortable giving feedback - helpful or critical. How about we help managers with this very learnable skill? And how about if we train employees how to ask for feedback on a regular basis? And train them to be very specific in the type of feedback they are looking for. This could truly build a "feedback rich" culture, which so many organizations say they want. Great read!
26 Years Executive Digital Marketer & Strategist
2 年Thought provoking as always, Christine Laperriere