Performance Implications for Internet Connected Brew Devices
James Pulley
I solve software performance issues that financially impact business operations
QA Consultants Performance Engineering Group
Advisory to RFC- 7168,?The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)??
Let’s talk about the performance implications for internet-connected brewing devices, focusing on a protocol known as RFC-7168, which extends the Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (HTCPCP) to include tea brewing devices.
?
For brew_start, brew_stop, and brew_status, the following example message bodies are returned where an HTTP 200 or 377 BREW status code is present:
{"/{tea type[dejarling!earl grey|english breakfast|oolong|...]" {type message/teapot}},
The problem: A watched pot never boils??
Watching the Pot: Monitoring the brewing process too closely can overwhelm the teapot with requests, potentially causing service disruptions and prolonging the brewing time.
领英推荐
Recommendations
RFC-7168 is silent on cache status on the individual TEA client requests. To optimize performance and prevent overloading the teapot, the performance engineering group, QA Consultants, recommends a brew cache status of 15 seconds to be maintained by a caching proxy or CDN in front of the brewing cluster. ?This allows for efficient brewing without the need for constant monitoring.
Optimal Options for this task are:?
Cache Timing: The recommended cache window of 15 seconds strikes a balance between efficient brewing and user experience. It's essential not to cache certain response codes to ensure accurate status updates.
?Fifteen seconds is also within the significant perception window for caffeinated individuals. As such, a brew status with a fifteen-second or less cache age is unlikely to cause abandonment of a TEA client session or a DBT (Denial of Brewed Tea) hostile response. If experimenting, this window should never be shorter than five seconds, or the watch process will lengthen the time required to boil the kettle, leading to a hostile DBT response.??
BREW Status response codes 200, 300, 403, 418, & 503 should never be cached.?
Overall, we want to emphasize the importance of managing the internet-connected brewing process efficiently, considering both technical performance and user experience factors.
Does it work? Does it Scale? Is it Secure? Is it accessible? Is the tea done yet? How can we help you today?
OMG! We need to start having meetings about this and plan out POC for tools to test and implement this. Labs will need to be built, standards set and verified, and project plans and sprint stories built!