Perfect Job Descriptions, Really? What works?
Perfect job descriptions like perfect candidates do not exist, so what is left to write?? Yes, there is more to think on.
First, I still occasionally sense in hiring managers a desire for the perfect candidate. This leads to trying to write the perfect job description.
Job descriptions often have 15-20 requirements. Can a hiring manager interview on 20 items?
Companies need to think clearly what their top priorities are for the job. What do they need this person to achieve? If they can answer that in one sentence they are close.? Needing English and certain work history would take one more sentence. That is core data for the search. No one can check 20 boxes. See also Ideal Job Descriptions - What a Mess.
领英推荐
Perfect Job Descriptions Thinking Needs to Be Put Aside
So let's try to shake off thoughts of a perfect hire and find great hires. Let's shake off thoughts of a perfect job description and focus on a few things that will make this a great hire.
Do you need this person to sell $1M or save you $1M, or do you need someone who can delight customers with a special design. Surely you need someone who can accomplish an important mission for you in the next year.? That is what we need. That is what will draw the right candidate in.
Carefully crafted JD's may be boring, but you can change that.? Attract the right candidates by saying what you want accomplished in the first three lines of the JD. That will grab the right people. The rest is just details.
Candidates want to achieve something in their new job. So inspire them with what you hope to achieve. A description of responsibilities bores everyone. So a little change of thinking and a departure from thinking perfect can take us a long way.? Then will be taking a good step to draw in the right people.
?
Managing Director & General Manager | Driving Sales & Marketing Innovation in APAC Consumer and Industrial Products | Expert in China Market Growth Strategies.
1 年This is an excellent post Jim, and one that requires a decent amount of thought and application to the cause. Having read and written quite a few JDs over the years, sometimes less is more. Less use of internal terms and acronyms and more focus on structuring a more balanced and concise document for me is key. You can always get deeper into the technical side of things during the screening process or actual interview. Applicants deserve to know the right amount of information that gives them an understanding of what the role entails without crushing everyone with a War and Peace doc. In previous roles when we were looking for talent, I would get the direct manager to write out the JD before collaborating with HR for the final version. This in my opinion also allowed the manager to use their experiences and needs for the role to be captured in their own way. Too many times in the past I had seen the whole thing handballed to the HR team via an email, etc., with varying levels of results and applicants. Ownership of this is as important as revenue results for me. Less internalising the document with more focus on clarity and conciseness for the reader. Great topic!