Per-user licensing models equal shelfware

Per-user licensing models equal shelfware

A year ago, we declared that dashboards were dead in the world of cloud data. It's now time for shelfware licensing models to go away too.?

Why has the user-based pricing model, which seems so simple, fallen out of favor with customers, vendors, and industry analysts? Could it be greed, group-think, or something else? We interviewed and analyzed hundreds of old and new licensing models at ThoughtSpot, all of which are moving away from it.

Our CRO, Spencer, told me that while he pays his electricity bill per usage, he won't do the same for his Tesla as a per-mile subscription. That question gave me the answer, too.

Although Spencer does not pay per mile, I do for my car. The difference is that he owns his car outright while I am on a lease for three years and 36,000 miles. When leasing/renting anything, it is essential to have a metric to manage the depreciation of the device; otherwise, the amortization will not be equally calculated.

As long as customers own their databases, as SAP and Oracle on-prem did, it would have been easy to sell deterministic and non-elastic licenses. On-prem BI software like Tableau would also fall into this category. In this case, clients were outright purchasing depreciating assets, and they were liable for paying for them regardless of whether they used them. User-based licensing models worked for that.

There has to be an elastic metric in the model where the software is rented, for a cloud-software is an appreciating asset as more features get added. Can the user/seat license be portable and elastic? Yes, but then the credentials, authentication, ownership, privacy, and governance will have to be tied to some other immobile entity. For example, when you are not using your user license, someone else may want to use it, but it should automatically change the new user's ID's permission and scope. Technically doable, but highly confusing and complex.

Since a person isn't pro tem (At least in the non-meta sense), their ID can't be. So user-based are fixed and un-elastic. It was built for the old world of on-prem software.

A leased property should accommodate flexible pricing, and flexible pricing can only be tied to a pro tem metric. That's why companies connect them to time, queries, APIs, and other directly related entities to the value they receive.

To fully deliver the value customers are paying for a cloud software product, we need to eliminate shelfware. Any vendor selling a per-user licensing model for cloud software holds you back and makes you spend way more than the value they deliver to your business.

That is why ThoughtSpot will be launching a completely revamped pricing and packaging model at our user conference next week. We think it will help us go forward in our mission to make the world more fact-driven. I hope you will join us there.

Samira Moye Lawande

MedTech Executive | Leading Global Turnarounds, Strategic Initiatives and Complex Programs | Global Health | Devices, Digital & AI/ ML| CHIEF Founding Member | Management Consultant | Board Member | Advisor

2 年

Very interesting!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sudheesh Nair的更多文章

  • Words I wish I had heard a decade ago

    Words I wish I had heard a decade ago

    Happiness or sadness in life is often just one phone call away. Sometimes that call could be from a doctor’s office or…

    32 条评论
  • Active Appreciation

    Active Appreciation

    People often say, "I can walk and chew gum." If you have a Gen-Z at home, you know they can do that and much more…

    13 条评论
  • Building Enterprise SaaS in today's Macro Environment.

    Building Enterprise SaaS in today's Macro Environment.

    I have not attended many networking events in the last few years. I decided to change that and attend four events in…

    12 条评论
  • Sometimes, things work out.

    Sometimes, things work out.

    Just over four years ago, we decided to rebuild ThoughtSpot as a cloud company. In February of 2021, we formally…

    22 条评论
  • We acquired Mode Analytics so you can ditch static dashboards for Generative AI.

    We acquired Mode Analytics so you can ditch static dashboards for Generative AI.

    Earlier this year, I spoke at Beyond 2023 about the power of language. Free-flowing natural language is the most…

    13 条评论
  • Microsoft hasn't innovated anything for the enterprise in a long while.

    Microsoft hasn't innovated anything for the enterprise in a long while.

    Recently, a startup engaged ThoughtSpot to build a data app using our gen-AI-based embedded analytics product…

    8 条评论
  • 'Tis the time to take Tableau out

    'Tis the time to take Tableau out

    Every day, there's a new article saying Salesforce is destroying Tableau. Let me start by saying Marc Benioff is a…

    15 条评论
  • "Pessimists sound smart. Optimists make money."

    "Pessimists sound smart. Optimists make money."

    Spencer Tuttle, our CRO, was on a 3-week tour of Asia. While boarding the 21-hour flight home, I suspect he was highly…

    11 条评论
  • Roe vs. Wade: Undoing progress

    Roe vs. Wade: Undoing progress

    You will immediately realize at least two things if you've witnessed childbirth. 1.

  • Removing friction points, one at a time

    Removing friction points, one at a time

    The average ThoughtSpot transaction three years ago was about $250,000. Today we are doing a limited release of our…

    12 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了