The People of the State of New York, et al, Vs. Thurman Brown ( Docket # 20-cv-0020) (EDNY) (GRB)

On September 18, 2020, New York State and the County of Nassau were served a Summon and Complaint answerable before the Honorable Gary R. Brown, District Judge, Eastern District of New York.

Plaintiff, Thurman Brown, claims that N.Y.S. Unified Court System is re-adjudicating void criminal processes that lack subject-matter and personal jurisdiction over the accused. On October 7, 1996, State Court Judge, Victor M. Ort (Nassau County), terminated indictment number 96469, pursuant to Criminal Procedural Law § 160.50, and Sealed the record. On November 4, 1996, State Court Judge Donald P. De Riggi (Nassau County), terminated docket number 29224-96, pursuant to Criminal Procedural Law § 160.50, and Sealed the record. By operation of law these termination in favor of the accused are exonerations by legislative intent. The State continued to prosecute plaintiff on phantom void criminal processes using recycling terminated indictment number 96469-96 and underlying docket numbers. In a “not for publication opinion and order” by the Honorable Allyne R. Ross (EDNY), dated December 3, 2007, the Court states in pertinent part, “as indicated, plaintiff submits evidence that several New York State indictments against him were dismissed pursuant to N.Y.C.P.L. § 160.50, see id at 3-4. These submissions indicate that those indictments were indeed dismissed on October 1996, id, and thus could not have formed the basis for his convictions in 1997”.

There is no superseding indictments or docket numbers in place. Double Jeopardy is an absolute barrier against holding an exonerated person for same offense(s) twice. No Court can establish the basis for convictions in 1997. There is no basis after CPL §160. 50. What that means is plaintiff was illegally bound in unconstitutional custody from October 7, 1996 through July 24, 2009. It means that the parallel judicial proceedings were a grotesque applications of jurisprudence that had the full force of our system of laws to a shocking degree. The hearings and trial were a sham. The jury a sham. The victims were changed into something other than complainant. The convictions a sham and were imposed in the name of the People of the State of New York. The parallel appeals processess were give the full force of law but were a sham. This void criminal process reaced finality before the United State Supreme Court on a Writ of Certiorari which was summarily denied. The U.S. Supreme Court accepted a void criminal process that lacked subject-matter and personal jurisdiction over the petitioner. By operation of law, this back channel procedure is in violation of the 13th Amendment and serves to appeal that amendment in violation of section (2): Only Congress has the power to enforce slavery amendment via appropriate legislation, Due Process, not the Judiciary.

State and Federal Courts has committed all types of fraud to aid and abet cover up. I see Justice this way, all officers of the Court that reads this article has an obligation to make sure these claims are determined. That is your oath to the Court. Will you continue to look the other way? I can be reached anytime at 1- 347-782-4097, or [email protected]

Thurman Brown

A.K.A. Dred Scott 1999