People are More Difficult Than Algorithms?
Ken Carlson
Experienced Executive Coach and Leadership Trainer with a knack for working with Geeks; Specializing in Engineering, Science, Math, and Medical.
Welcome to The Neurodiversity Coach Newsletter. As an Executive Coach, Leadership Trainer and self-professed geek, I've had the opportunity to work with neurodivergent leaders and coach them through many leadership and workplace challenges. Each week I share resources and insights for neurodivergent leaders and the rest of us.
In this week's newsletter we discuss the nuances of dealing with people compared to computer algorithms.
____________________________________________________________________
People are More Difficult Than Algorithms?
I feel for geniuses.?
They were probably doing math at a university level while they were still in grade school—maybe even asked to tutor their classmates. They mastered science concepts long before their peers. Their parent’s approval was tied to their amazing abilities—so they were beloved by the adults in their life. If they were lucky, they went to a “gifted” high school and onwards to schools like MIT, Caltech, and Stanford. Those who navigated University often went on to post-doctoral work or they ended up starting their own companies or working for Big-Tech.?
Sounds perfect right?
My genius clients report something different:
I have this client—definitely a genius—at a big tech company who is a star when it comes to solving technical problems but he keeps on getting dinged for how he is with people. He just found out that some of his peers “hate” him. I feel for him. It has him contemplating leaving and starting over.
Being a genius doesn’t help you solve conflicts with humans.?
One of my super-smart friends, Jason de Villiers, put it this way in the context of computer software programming:
“In computing, the paradigm to encode an idea is known: There is a programming language with fixed syntax, a compiler and even a debugger can help when you get in trouble. There is no connotation to code, and the compiler does not try to read between the lines.? Conversely, when communicating an idea with one or more people there is seldom a fixed universal lexicon, and there is no compiler to help unravel intent, execution and perception when communicating goes awry. Each person filters the message through their accumulated experiences and scars and hears something different. It takes time and trust to be able to detect and debug human-to-human communication errors."
Time and trust.?
It’s clear. Our ways of being with others took time and years of conditioning to be created and if we want to shift how we are, we need to use time to create new conditioning. It’s just like building a muscle—reading about how to get strong will make ZERO difference. You need to pick up the weight and lift it day in and day out. Same with communication, influence, confidence, and trust.?
You don’t have to be a genius to experience the same things. If you resonate with any of it—try on some conditioning.?
Godspeed
___________________________________________________________
Past Articles: Neurodiverse Leadership Resource Library
Want more resources on neurodiversity leadership? We are finding and creating resources for you. Watch this section expand every week.
领英推荐
_______________________________________________________________
Staying In Touch
What leadership challenges are you facing??I’d love to hear from you - feel free to set up a time to chat here:?Let's talk!
Make sure you never miss an issue! Click the "subscribe" button in the upper right-hand corner of the page. For more articles and insights,?connect with me here.